Comparing the efficacy of adrenaline, clonidine, and dexmedetomidine in enhancing local anesthesia for impacted third molar extraction: a randomized controlled trial.

Akash Doshi, Nitin Bhola, Anchal Agarwal
{"title":"Comparing the efficacy of adrenaline, clonidine, and dexmedetomidine in enhancing local anesthesia for impacted third molar extraction: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Akash Doshi, Nitin Bhola, Anchal Agarwal","doi":"10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.4.285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In human dentition, the most commonly impacted teeth are the mandibular third molars (M3M). The removal or extraction of these teeth often causes anxiety in patients due to the perceived pain involved in the process. Therefore, pain must be effectively managed using anesthesia. The use of newer local anesthetic drugs can help minimize side effects and drug interactions. Traditionally, adrenaline is used as a vasoconstrictor along with lignocaine. When combined with lignocaine, the alpha agonists dexmedetomidine and clonidine can extend the duration of anesthesia, thereby reducing the need for additional pain-relieving medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a randomized, triple-blind, parallel-arm design. Sixty patients were screened, and 45 systemically healthy patients requiring unilateral surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars with similar difficulty (moderate-to-difficult according to the Modified Pederson's Index) were included in the study. Patients were allocated into three groups as follows: Group A: 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with 1:100,000 Adrenaline, Group C: 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with 15 µg/mL Clonidine, and Group D: 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with 1 µg/mL Dexmedetomidine. The evaluated parameters were the time of onset of anesthesia, depth of anesthesia, hemodynamic parameters, and duration of postoperative analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group D had a faster onset of action and prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia compared with Groups A and C. No statistically significant differences were observed between the three groups in terms of the depth of anesthesia and hemodynamic parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Group D exhibited a significantly more rapid onset of anesthesia than Groups A and C, and the postoperative analgesic effect in Group D was significantly prolonged (7.22 hours) compared with that in Groups A (4.54 hours) and C (2.1 hours). Patients receiving the Group D solution experienced an extended period of comfort without the need for analgesics for up to 7.22 hours post-procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"24 4","pages":"285-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11304038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.4.285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In human dentition, the most commonly impacted teeth are the mandibular third molars (M3M). The removal or extraction of these teeth often causes anxiety in patients due to the perceived pain involved in the process. Therefore, pain must be effectively managed using anesthesia. The use of newer local anesthetic drugs can help minimize side effects and drug interactions. Traditionally, adrenaline is used as a vasoconstrictor along with lignocaine. When combined with lignocaine, the alpha agonists dexmedetomidine and clonidine can extend the duration of anesthesia, thereby reducing the need for additional pain-relieving medications.

Methods: This study used a randomized, triple-blind, parallel-arm design. Sixty patients were screened, and 45 systemically healthy patients requiring unilateral surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars with similar difficulty (moderate-to-difficult according to the Modified Pederson's Index) were included in the study. Patients were allocated into three groups as follows: Group A: 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with 1:100,000 Adrenaline, Group C: 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with 15 µg/mL Clonidine, and Group D: 2% Lignocaine Hydrochloride with 1 µg/mL Dexmedetomidine. The evaluated parameters were the time of onset of anesthesia, depth of anesthesia, hemodynamic parameters, and duration of postoperative analgesia.

Results: Group D had a faster onset of action and prolonged duration of postoperative analgesia compared with Groups A and C. No statistically significant differences were observed between the three groups in terms of the depth of anesthesia and hemodynamic parameters.

Conclusion: Group D exhibited a significantly more rapid onset of anesthesia than Groups A and C, and the postoperative analgesic effect in Group D was significantly prolonged (7.22 hours) compared with that in Groups A (4.54 hours) and C (2.1 hours). Patients receiving the Group D solution experienced an extended period of comfort without the need for analgesics for up to 7.22 hours post-procedure.

比较肾上腺素、氯尼丁和右美托咪定在增强第三磨牙拔除术局部麻醉中的效果:随机对照试验。
背景:在人类牙齿中,最常见的阻生齿是下颌第三磨牙(M3M)。由于在拔牙过程中会感到疼痛,拔除这些牙齿往往会引起患者的焦虑。因此,必须使用麻醉来有效控制疼痛。使用较新的局部麻醉药物有助于最大限度地减少副作用和药物相互作用。传统上,肾上腺素与木质素一起用作血管收缩剂。与木质素合用时,α-激动剂右美托咪定和克洛尼定可延长麻醉时间,从而减少对额外镇痛药物的需求:本研究采用随机、三盲、平行臂设计。研究筛选了 60 名患者,其中包括 45 名全身健康、需要单侧手术拔除下颌第三磨牙且难度相似(根据改良佩德森指数为中度至难度)的患者。患者被分为以下三组:A 组:2% 盐酸木质素加 1:100,000 肾上腺素;C 组:2% 盐酸木质素加 15 µg/mL 氯尼丁;D 组:2% 盐酸木质素加 1:100,000 肾上腺素:2%盐酸利格诺卡因加 1 µg/mL 右美托咪定。评估参数包括麻醉起效时间、麻醉深度、血液动力学参数和术后镇痛持续时间:结果:与 A 组和 C 组相比,D 组起效更快,术后镇痛持续时间更长:结论:与 A 组(4.54 小时)和 C 组(2.1 小时)相比,D 组的麻醉起效明显更快,术后镇痛效果明显延长(7.22 小时)。接受 D 组溶液治疗的患者在术后 7.22 小时内无需使用镇痛剂,可享受更长时间的舒适感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信