Halley Ruppel PhD, RN, Christopher P. Bonafide MD, MSCE, Rinad S. Beidas PhD, Kimberly Albanowski MHS-MA, Raymond Parlar-Chun MD, MS, Prabi Rajbhandari MD, Andrew S. Kern-Goldberger MD, MSCE, Patricia A. Stoeck MD, Kathleen Snow MD, Samantha A. House DO, MPH, Kate E. Lucey MD, MS, Patrick W. Brady MD, MSc, Amanda C. Schondelmeyer MD, MSc, For the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings (PRIS) Network
{"title":"Continuous pulse oximetry monitoring in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis: A qualitative analysis of clinicians' justifications","authors":"Halley Ruppel PhD, RN, Christopher P. Bonafide MD, MSCE, Rinad S. Beidas PhD, Kimberly Albanowski MHS-MA, Raymond Parlar-Chun MD, MS, Prabi Rajbhandari MD, Andrew S. Kern-Goldberger MD, MSCE, Patricia A. Stoeck MD, Kathleen Snow MD, Samantha A. House DO, MPH, Kate E. Lucey MD, MS, Patrick W. Brady MD, MSc, Amanda C. Schondelmeyer MD, MSc, For the Pediatric Research in Inpatient Settings (PRIS) Network","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Continuous pulse oximetry (cSpO<sub>2</sub>) monitoring use outside established guidelines is common in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis. We analyzed clinicians' real-time rationale for continuous monitoring in stable children with bronchiolitis not requiring supplemental oxygen. Data for this study were collected as part a multicenter deimplementation trial for cSpO<sub>2</sub> in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis. We analyzed 371 clinician responses across 36 hospitals; 258 (70%) responses did not include a clinical reason for monitoring (“nonclinical”; e.g., respondent forgot to discontinue monitoring, did not know why the patient was monitored, or was following an order). The remaining 113 (30%) responses contained a clinical reason for monitoring (“clinical”; e.g., recently requiring oxygen, physical exam concerns, or concerns relating to patient condition or history). Strategies to reduce unnecessary monitoring should include changes in workflow to facilitate shared understanding of monitoring goals and timely discontinuation of monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"19 11","pages":"1028-1034"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.13442","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Continuous pulse oximetry (cSpO2) monitoring use outside established guidelines is common in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis. We analyzed clinicians' real-time rationale for continuous monitoring in stable children with bronchiolitis not requiring supplemental oxygen. Data for this study were collected as part a multicenter deimplementation trial for cSpO2 in children hospitalized with bronchiolitis. We analyzed 371 clinician responses across 36 hospitals; 258 (70%) responses did not include a clinical reason for monitoring (“nonclinical”; e.g., respondent forgot to discontinue monitoring, did not know why the patient was monitored, or was following an order). The remaining 113 (30%) responses contained a clinical reason for monitoring (“clinical”; e.g., recently requiring oxygen, physical exam concerns, or concerns relating to patient condition or history). Strategies to reduce unnecessary monitoring should include changes in workflow to facilitate shared understanding of monitoring goals and timely discontinuation of monitoring.
期刊介绍:
JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children.
Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.