Ultrasound-based Measurement of the Intra-scaphoid angle.

Hand surgery & rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101755
Mauro Maniglio, Bérénice Moutinot, Sébastien Durand
{"title":"Ultrasound-based Measurement of the Intra-scaphoid angle.","authors":"Mauro Maniglio, Bérénice Moutinot, Sébastien Durand","doi":"10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasound is gaining popularity for diagnosing scaphoid fractures. However, it hasn't been used to assess fracture displacement, such as humpback deformity. We propose a sonographic method to measure the intra-scaphoid angle, potentially serving as an alternative to CT scans for detecting fragment malposition after a scaphoid fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 11 healthy adult volunteers without wrist pathology and performed bilateral wrist ultrasounds, totaling 22 examinations. Each wrist was splinted at 50 ° extension and fully supinated. Two hand surgeons independently performed the ultrasounds. All images were then evaluated separately by two evaluators. The following measurements were taken: 1. Inter-poles distance (IPD): Distance between the summits of the two scaphoid poles on the palmar cortex. 2. Palmar cortical intra-scaphoid angle (PCISA): Angle between the two summits and the deepest point of the waist on the palmar cortex. Measurements were compared for inter-investigator and inter-evaluator reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included four males and seven females, with an average age of 35 years (range 21-56). The mean PCISA was 142 ° (SD 10 °) and the mean IPD was 16.3 mm (SD 2.1 mm). Differences in IPD measurements averaged 0.3 mm (range 0-5.2 mm) among investigators and 1.0 mm (range 0.1-3.8 mm) among evaluators. For PCISA, the differences averaged 4 ° (range 0-17 °) among investigators and 6 ° (range 0-15 °) among evaluators. The ICC for IPD was 0.804 (investigators) and 0.572 (evaluators); for PCISA, it was 0.704 (investigators) and 0.602 (evaluators).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents a cost-effective and accessible sonographic technique to measure the intra-scaphoid angle. Further research is required to assess its effectiveness in scaphoid fractures and compare it to CT-based measurements like the H/L ratio, LISA, and DCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94023,"journal":{"name":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound is gaining popularity for diagnosing scaphoid fractures. However, it hasn't been used to assess fracture displacement, such as humpback deformity. We propose a sonographic method to measure the intra-scaphoid angle, potentially serving as an alternative to CT scans for detecting fragment malposition after a scaphoid fracture.

Methods: We recruited 11 healthy adult volunteers without wrist pathology and performed bilateral wrist ultrasounds, totaling 22 examinations. Each wrist was splinted at 50 ° extension and fully supinated. Two hand surgeons independently performed the ultrasounds. All images were then evaluated separately by two evaluators. The following measurements were taken: 1. Inter-poles distance (IPD): Distance between the summits of the two scaphoid poles on the palmar cortex. 2. Palmar cortical intra-scaphoid angle (PCISA): Angle between the two summits and the deepest point of the waist on the palmar cortex. Measurements were compared for inter-investigator and inter-evaluator reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: The study included four males and seven females, with an average age of 35 years (range 21-56). The mean PCISA was 142 ° (SD 10 °) and the mean IPD was 16.3 mm (SD 2.1 mm). Differences in IPD measurements averaged 0.3 mm (range 0-5.2 mm) among investigators and 1.0 mm (range 0.1-3.8 mm) among evaluators. For PCISA, the differences averaged 4 ° (range 0-17 °) among investigators and 6 ° (range 0-15 °) among evaluators. The ICC for IPD was 0.804 (investigators) and 0.572 (evaluators); for PCISA, it was 0.704 (investigators) and 0.602 (evaluators).

Conclusion: This study presents a cost-effective and accessible sonographic technique to measure the intra-scaphoid angle. Further research is required to assess its effectiveness in scaphoid fractures and compare it to CT-based measurements like the H/L ratio, LISA, and DCA.

使用三点测量技术进行肩胛骨内超声波测量的可行性。
导言超声波在诊断肩胛骨骨折方面越来越受欢迎。然而,它还未被用于评估骨折移位,如驼背畸形。我们提出了一种测量肩胛骨内角的超声波方法,该方法可替代 CT 扫描检测肩胛骨骨折后的碎片错位情况:方法:我们招募了 11 名无腕部病变的健康成年志愿者,并进行了双侧腕部超声波检查,共 22 次。每只腕关节均夹板固定,外展 50°,完全仰卧。两名手外科医生独立进行超声波检查。然后由两名评估人员分别对所有图像进行评估。测量结果如下两极间距离(IPD):掌皮层上两个肩胛骨极点之间的距离。掌皮质肩胛内角(PCISA):掌皮质上两肩胛骨顶点与腰部最深点之间的角度。使用类内相关系数(ICC)比较研究者之间和评估者之间测量的可靠性:研究对象包括四名男性和七名女性,平均年龄为 35 岁(21-56 岁不等)。PCISA 的平均值为 142°(SD 10°),IPD 的平均值为 16.3 mm(SD 2.1 mm)。研究者之间的 IPD 测量值平均相差 0.3 毫米(范围 0 至 5.2 毫米),评估者之间的 IPD 测量值平均相差 1.0 毫米(范围 0.1 至 3.8 毫米)。在 PCISA 测量中,调查人员之间的差异平均为 4°(范围为 0 至 17°),评估人员之间的差异平均为 6°(范围为 0 至 15°)。IPD的ICC为0.804(调查者)和0.572(评估者);PCISA的ICC为0.704(调查者)和0.602(评估者):本研究提出了一种测量肩胛骨内角的经济有效且简便易行的超声技术。需要进一步研究评估其在肩胛骨骨折中的有效性,并将其与基于 CT 的测量方法(如 H/L 比值、LISA 和 DCA)进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信