Implementation outcomes from a multi-site stepped wedge cluster randomized family caregiver skills training trial.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Courtney Harold Van Houtven, Kasey Decosimo, Connor Drake, Rebecca Bruening, Nina R Sperber, Joshua Dadolf, Matthew Tucker, Cynthia J Coffman, Janet M Grubber, Karen M Stechuchak, Swetha Kota, Leah Christensen, Cathleen Colón-Emeric, George L Jackson, Emily Franzosa, Leah L Zullig, Kelli D Allen, Susan N Hastings, Virginia Wang
{"title":"Implementation outcomes from a multi-site stepped wedge cluster randomized family caregiver skills training trial.","authors":"Courtney Harold Van Houtven, Kasey Decosimo, Connor Drake, Rebecca Bruening, Nina R Sperber, Joshua Dadolf, Matthew Tucker, Cynthia J Coffman, Janet M Grubber, Karen M Stechuchak, Swetha Kota, Leah Christensen, Cathleen Colón-Emeric, George L Jackson, Emily Franzosa, Leah L Zullig, Kelli D Allen, Susan N Hastings, Virginia Wang","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether a team collaboration strategy (CONNECT) improves implementation outcomes of a family caregiver skills training program (iHI-FIVES).</p><p><strong>Data sources and study setting: </strong>iHI-FIVES was delivered to caregivers at eight Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. Data sources were electronic health records, staff surveys, and interviews.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial, sites were randomized to a 6-month time interval start date for iHI-FIVES launch. Sites were then randomized 1:1 to either (i) CONNECT, a team collaboration training strategy plus Replicating Effective Programs (REP), brief technical support training for staff, or (ii) REP only (non-CONNECT arm). Implementation outcomes included reach (proportion of eligible caregivers enrolled) and fidelity (proportion of expected trainings delivered). Staff interviews and surveys assessed team function including communication, implementation experience, and their relation to CONNECT and iHI-FIVES implementation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data collection/extraction methods: </strong>The sample for assessing implementation outcomes included 571 Veterans referred to VA home- and community-based services and their family caregivers eligible for iHI-FIVES. Prior to iHI-FIVES launch, staff completed 65 surveys and 62 interviews. After the start of iHI-FIVES, staff completed 52 surveys and 38 interviews. Mixed methods evaluated reach and fidelity by arm.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Fidelity was high overall with 88% of expected iHI-FIVES trainings delivered, and higher among REP only (non-CONNECT) compared with CONNECT sites (95% vs. 80%). Reach was 18% (average proportion of reach across eight sites) and higher among non-CONNECT compared with CONNECT sites (22% vs. 14%). Qualitative interviews revealed strong leadership support at high-reach sites. CONNECT did not influence self-reported team function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A team collaboration strategy (CONNECT), added to REP, required more resources to implement iHI-FIVES than REP only and did not substantially enhance reach or fidelity. Leadership support was a key condition of implementation success and may be an important factor for improving iHI-FIVES reach with national expansion.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14361","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether a team collaboration strategy (CONNECT) improves implementation outcomes of a family caregiver skills training program (iHI-FIVES).

Data sources and study setting: iHI-FIVES was delivered to caregivers at eight Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. Data sources were electronic health records, staff surveys, and interviews.

Study design: In a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial, sites were randomized to a 6-month time interval start date for iHI-FIVES launch. Sites were then randomized 1:1 to either (i) CONNECT, a team collaboration training strategy plus Replicating Effective Programs (REP), brief technical support training for staff, or (ii) REP only (non-CONNECT arm). Implementation outcomes included reach (proportion of eligible caregivers enrolled) and fidelity (proportion of expected trainings delivered). Staff interviews and surveys assessed team function including communication, implementation experience, and their relation to CONNECT and iHI-FIVES implementation outcomes.

Data collection/extraction methods: The sample for assessing implementation outcomes included 571 Veterans referred to VA home- and community-based services and their family caregivers eligible for iHI-FIVES. Prior to iHI-FIVES launch, staff completed 65 surveys and 62 interviews. After the start of iHI-FIVES, staff completed 52 surveys and 38 interviews. Mixed methods evaluated reach and fidelity by arm.

Principal findings: Fidelity was high overall with 88% of expected iHI-FIVES trainings delivered, and higher among REP only (non-CONNECT) compared with CONNECT sites (95% vs. 80%). Reach was 18% (average proportion of reach across eight sites) and higher among non-CONNECT compared with CONNECT sites (22% vs. 14%). Qualitative interviews revealed strong leadership support at high-reach sites. CONNECT did not influence self-reported team function.

Conclusions: A team collaboration strategy (CONNECT), added to REP, required more resources to implement iHI-FIVES than REP only and did not substantially enhance reach or fidelity. Leadership support was a key condition of implementation success and may be an important factor for improving iHI-FIVES reach with national expansion.

多站点阶梯式楔形群随机家庭照顾者技能培训试验的实施成果。
目的:评估团队合作策略(CONNECT)是否能改善家庭护理人员技能培训计划(iHI-FIVES)的实施效果:评估团队协作策略(CONNECT)是否能改善家庭照顾者技能培训项目(iHI-FIVES)的实施效果。数据来源与研究环境:iHI-FIVES 在八个退伍军人事务(VA)医疗中心向照顾者提供。数据来源包括电子健康记录、员工调查和访谈:研究设计:在一项阶梯式楔形群组随机试验中,研究机构被随机分配到一个为期 6 个月的 iHI-FIVES 启动日期。然后,各医疗点按 1:1 的比例被随机分配到 (i) CONNECT(团队协作培训策略)加 Replicating Effective Programs (REP)(针对员工的简短技术支持培训)或 (ii) 仅 REP(非 CONNECT 组)。实施结果包括覆盖范围(符合条件的护理人员参加培训的比例)和忠实度(完成预期培训的比例)。员工访谈和调查评估了团队功能,包括沟通、实施经验及其与 CONNECT 和 iHI-FIVES 实施结果的关系:评估实施成果的样本包括 571 名转诊至退伍军人事务部居家和社区服务机构的退伍军人及其符合 iHI-FIVES 条件的家庭护理人员。在 iHI-FIVES 启动之前,工作人员完成了 65 份调查和 62 次访谈。iHI-FIVES 启动后,工作人员完成了 52 份调查和 38 次访谈。混合方法评估了各部门的覆盖范围和忠实度:总体而言,忠实度很高,88% 的预期 iHI-FIVES 培训已完成,仅在 REP(非 CONNECT)中的忠实度高于 CONNECT 站点(95% 对 80%)。覆盖率为 18%(8 个项目点的平均覆盖率),非 CONNECT 项目点的覆盖率高于 CONNECT 项目点(22% 对 14%)。定性访谈显示,高覆盖率站点得到了领导层的大力支持。CONNECT 并未影响自我报告的团队功能:结论:在 REP 的基础上增加团队协作策略(CONNECT),实施 iHI-FIVES 所需的资源要多于仅实施 REP 所需的资源,而且并未显著提高覆盖率或忠实度。领导的支持是实施成功的关键条件,也可能是扩大 iHI-FIVES 在全国的覆盖面的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信