Online medical consultation in China: Demand-side analysis of obese patients' preferences and willingness-to-pay for online obesity consultations.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241272525
Yaolin Hu, Jian Wang, Yuanyuan Gu, Stephen Nicholas, Elizabeth Maitland, Jianbo Zhou
{"title":"Online medical consultation in China: Demand-side analysis of obese patients' preferences and willingness-to-pay for online obesity consultations.","authors":"Yaolin Hu, Jian Wang, Yuanyuan Gu, Stephen Nicholas, Elizabeth Maitland, Jianbo Zhou","doi":"10.1177/20552076241272525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>With obesity a major health concern and call on healthcare resources in China, we explored the preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for obesity OMC, including the influencing factors behind WTP and preferences.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We recruited 400 obese participants to undertake a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and the contingent value method (CVM) survey. We used CVM to measure obese participants' WTP for one-click services (OCS) and used DCE to estimate obesity participants' preferences and WTP for OMC with different attributes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Obese participants were willing to pay more than RMB80 on average for OCS, and more than 50% of participants had a WTP over RMB50 and 5% had a WTP over RMB300, reflecting the strong willingness of Chinese obese patients to pay for OMC. Educational background, income, ethnicity, previous OMC experience and accessibility to offline hospitals with different levels impacted WTP. The relative importance score of attributes in descending order was cost, doctors' hospital level, doctors' level, online waiting time, consultation time and consultation form. Obese patients preferred lower cost, doctors from higher-level hospitals, doctors with higher expertise levels, shorter waiting time and consultation duration, and telephone consultation were preferred. 30-min waiting time, 15-min consultation duration and telephone consultation were the most economically efficient set we found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To maximize health resources, provincial tertiary and municipal hospitals face different paths to developing obesity OMC platforms. We encouraged young doctors to use OMC. OMC regulators should implement consumer protection policies to optimize OMC pricing and address potential 'unfair' pricing.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11307359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241272525","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: With obesity a major health concern and call on healthcare resources in China, we explored the preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for obesity OMC, including the influencing factors behind WTP and preferences.

Method: We recruited 400 obese participants to undertake a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and the contingent value method (CVM) survey. We used CVM to measure obese participants' WTP for one-click services (OCS) and used DCE to estimate obesity participants' preferences and WTP for OMC with different attributes.

Results: Obese participants were willing to pay more than RMB80 on average for OCS, and more than 50% of participants had a WTP over RMB50 and 5% had a WTP over RMB300, reflecting the strong willingness of Chinese obese patients to pay for OMC. Educational background, income, ethnicity, previous OMC experience and accessibility to offline hospitals with different levels impacted WTP. The relative importance score of attributes in descending order was cost, doctors' hospital level, doctors' level, online waiting time, consultation time and consultation form. Obese patients preferred lower cost, doctors from higher-level hospitals, doctors with higher expertise levels, shorter waiting time and consultation duration, and telephone consultation were preferred. 30-min waiting time, 15-min consultation duration and telephone consultation were the most economically efficient set we found.

Conclusion: To maximize health resources, provincial tertiary and municipal hospitals face different paths to developing obesity OMC platforms. We encouraged young doctors to use OMC. OMC regulators should implement consumer protection policies to optimize OMC pricing and address potential 'unfair' pricing.

中国的在线医疗咨询:肥胖症患者对在线肥胖症咨询的偏好和付费意愿的需求分析。
目的:在中国,肥胖是一个主要的健康问题,对医疗资源的需求也很大,因此我们探讨了肥胖者对肥胖OMC的偏好和支付意愿(WTP),包括WTP和偏好背后的影响因素:方法:我们招募了 400 名肥胖参与者进行离散选择实验(DCE)和或有价值法(CVM)调查。我们使用或然价值法测量肥胖参与者对一键式服务(OCS)的WTP,并使用离散选择实验估计肥胖参与者对不同属性的OMC的偏好和WTP:结果:肥胖症参与者平均愿意为一键式服务支付80元以上的费用,超过50%的参与者支付50元以上的费用,5%的参与者支付300元以上的费用,这反映了中国肥胖症患者支付一键式服务的强烈意愿。教育背景、收入、种族、以往的 OMC 经验和线下医院的可及性对 WTP 有不同程度的影响。各属性的相对重要性得分从高到低依次为费用、医生所在医院级别、医生级别、在线等待时间、就诊时间和就诊形式。肥胖患者倾向于选择费用较低、级别较高医院的医生、专业水平较高的医生、等候时间和问诊时间较短、电话问诊。我们发现,30 分钟候诊时间、15 分钟问诊时间和电话问诊是最具经济效益的问诊方式:为了最大限度地利用卫生资源,省级三甲医院和市级医院在发展肥胖问题在线医疗平台方面面临着不同的路径。我们鼓励年轻医生使用 OMC。OMC 监管机构应实施消费者保护政策,优化 OMC 定价,解决潜在的 "不公平 "定价问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信