Hance Clarke, Sarah Miles, Miki Peer, Mary-Ann Fitzcharles
{"title":"The Elusive Truth of Cannabinoids for Rheumatic Pain.","authors":"Hance Clarke, Sarah Miles, Miki Peer, Mary-Ann Fitzcharles","doi":"10.1007/s11926-024-01162-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Medical cannabis (MC) has entered mainstream medicine by a unique route. Regulatory acceptance as a medical product in many jurisdictions has bypassed the traditional evidence-based pathway required for therapies. Easier access to MC, especially related to recreational legalization of cannabis, has led to widespread use by patients for symptom relief of a variety of medical conditions and often without medical oversight. Musculoskeletal pain remains the most common reason for MC use. This review examines real-world issues pertaining to MC and offers some guidance for clinical care of patients with rheumatic diseases being treated with MC.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Controlled clinical studies of cannabis products in patients with rheumatic diseases have been small and tested a range of compounds, routes of administration, and clinical populations, limiting our ability to generate conclusions on MC's effectiveness in this population. Observational cohort studies and surveys suggest that use of MC and related products in patients with rheumatic diseases improves pain and associated symptoms but is commonly accompanied by mild to moderate side effects. Conflicting evidence contributes to practitioner and patient uncertainty regarding the use of MC for rheumatic disease-related pain. Despite promising preclinical and observational evidence that MC and cannabis-derived compounds are useful in the management of rheumatic disease-related pain, there remains limited high-quality clinical evidence to substantiate these findings. There are a significant number of clinical trials on this topic currently planned or underway, however, suggesting the next decade may yield more clarity. Nevertheless, given that many people with rheumatic diseases are using cannabis products, healthcare professionals must remain apprised of the evidence pertaining to cannabinoids, communicate such evidence to patients in a meaningful way that is free from personal bias and stigma, and maintain strong collaborative clinical care pertaining to MC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10761,"journal":{"name":"Current Rheumatology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"392-402"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Rheumatology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-024-01162-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: Medical cannabis (MC) has entered mainstream medicine by a unique route. Regulatory acceptance as a medical product in many jurisdictions has bypassed the traditional evidence-based pathway required for therapies. Easier access to MC, especially related to recreational legalization of cannabis, has led to widespread use by patients for symptom relief of a variety of medical conditions and often without medical oversight. Musculoskeletal pain remains the most common reason for MC use. This review examines real-world issues pertaining to MC and offers some guidance for clinical care of patients with rheumatic diseases being treated with MC.
Recent findings: Controlled clinical studies of cannabis products in patients with rheumatic diseases have been small and tested a range of compounds, routes of administration, and clinical populations, limiting our ability to generate conclusions on MC's effectiveness in this population. Observational cohort studies and surveys suggest that use of MC and related products in patients with rheumatic diseases improves pain and associated symptoms but is commonly accompanied by mild to moderate side effects. Conflicting evidence contributes to practitioner and patient uncertainty regarding the use of MC for rheumatic disease-related pain. Despite promising preclinical and observational evidence that MC and cannabis-derived compounds are useful in the management of rheumatic disease-related pain, there remains limited high-quality clinical evidence to substantiate these findings. There are a significant number of clinical trials on this topic currently planned or underway, however, suggesting the next decade may yield more clarity. Nevertheless, given that many people with rheumatic diseases are using cannabis products, healthcare professionals must remain apprised of the evidence pertaining to cannabinoids, communicate such evidence to patients in a meaningful way that is free from personal bias and stigma, and maintain strong collaborative clinical care pertaining to MC.
审查目的:医用大麻(MC)以独特的方式进入主流医学。许多司法管辖区对医用产品的监管认可绕过了传统疗法所需的循证途径。由于更容易获得 MC,特别是与大麻娱乐合法化有关,导致患者广泛使用 MC 来缓解各种病症的症状,而且往往不受医疗监督。肌肉骨骼疼痛仍然是使用 MC 的最常见原因。本综述探讨了与 MC 有关的现实问题,并为使用 MC 治疗风湿病患者的临床护理提供了一些指导:对风湿病患者进行的大麻产品对照临床研究规模较小,并且测试了一系列化合物、给药途径和临床人群,这限制了我们就 MC 在这一人群中的有效性得出结论的能力。观察性队列研究和调查表明,风湿病患者使用大麻和相关产品可以改善疼痛和相关症状,但通常会伴有轻度至中度的副作用。相互矛盾的证据导致从业人员和患者对使用 MC 治疗风湿病相关疼痛存在不确定性。尽管有临床前和观察证据表明 MC 和大麻衍生化合物有助于治疗风湿病相关疼痛,但证实这些发现的高质量临床证据仍然有限。不过,目前有大量有关这一主题的临床试验正在计划或进行中,这表明未来十年可能会有更多明确的结果。尽管如此,鉴于许多风湿病患者都在使用大麻产品,医护人员必须随时了解与大麻素有关的证据,以有意义的方式向患者传达这些证据,避免个人偏见和污名化,并保持与 MC 有关的强有力的临床合作护理。
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to review the most important, recently published research in the field of rheumatology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of rheumatologic conditions.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas such as the many forms of arthritis, osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also occasionally provided.