{"title":"Outcomes of a Virtual 10-Week COVID-19 and Psychosis Program in an HMO: A Mixed Methods Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Michelle Sallee, Michelle Renwick","doi":"10.1007/s10597-024-01331-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Virtual clinical services became the primary treatment modality in a large U.S. HMO psychiatry department during the COVID-19 pandemic. A mixed methods quality improvement project was developed to address psychosis, severe anxiety, and stressors unique to COVID-19 and sheltering in place. The purpose was to determine if a virtual 10-week pilot program combining psychoeducation, skills-based training, experiential exercises using third-wave CBT, and process questions would decrease symptoms and hospitalization rates and improve quality of life. Pre- and postmeasure scores on pandemic-related stress (the PRSF), perceived stress (PSS), and general patient health (PHQ-9) were gathered from five patients in the Department of Psychiatry at Kaiser Permanente in Oakland, California. Qualitative interviews explored patients' perceptions of program benefits. Mean, median, and range on the pre- and postprogram assessments and paired samples t tests for means were calculated. Quantitative results were not statistically significant: p = 0.32 (Revised PRSF), p = 0.34 (PSS), p = 0.94 (PHQ-9). In interviews, most participants reported a decrease in pandemic-related stress. Half reported a decrease in general perceived stress. Half reported no change. Self-assessment reflected perceptions of benefits from this 10-week program, using words such as useful and important. The virtual program helped relieve pandemic-related stress and improved overall quality of life. The results show promise for expanding the program to other hospitals providing services for this diagnostic population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10654,"journal":{"name":"Community Mental Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"104-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-024-01331-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Virtual clinical services became the primary treatment modality in a large U.S. HMO psychiatry department during the COVID-19 pandemic. A mixed methods quality improvement project was developed to address psychosis, severe anxiety, and stressors unique to COVID-19 and sheltering in place. The purpose was to determine if a virtual 10-week pilot program combining psychoeducation, skills-based training, experiential exercises using third-wave CBT, and process questions would decrease symptoms and hospitalization rates and improve quality of life. Pre- and postmeasure scores on pandemic-related stress (the PRSF), perceived stress (PSS), and general patient health (PHQ-9) were gathered from five patients in the Department of Psychiatry at Kaiser Permanente in Oakland, California. Qualitative interviews explored patients' perceptions of program benefits. Mean, median, and range on the pre- and postprogram assessments and paired samples t tests for means were calculated. Quantitative results were not statistically significant: p = 0.32 (Revised PRSF), p = 0.34 (PSS), p = 0.94 (PHQ-9). In interviews, most participants reported a decrease in pandemic-related stress. Half reported a decrease in general perceived stress. Half reported no change. Self-assessment reflected perceptions of benefits from this 10-week program, using words such as useful and important. The virtual program helped relieve pandemic-related stress and improved overall quality of life. The results show promise for expanding the program to other hospitals providing services for this diagnostic population.
期刊介绍:
Community Mental Health Journal focuses on the needs of people experiencing serious forms of psychological distress, as well as the structures established to address those needs. Areas of particular interest include critical examination of current paradigms of diagnosis and treatment, socio-structural determinants of mental health, social hierarchies within the public mental health systems, and the intersection of public mental health programs and social/racial justice and health equity. While this is the journal of the American Association for Community Psychiatry, we welcome manuscripts reflecting research from a range of disciplines on recovery-oriented services, public health policy, clinical delivery systems, advocacy, and emerging and innovative practices.