Ethical, legal, and regulatory landscape of artificial intelligence in Australian healthcare and ethical integration in radiography: A narrative review

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Ethical, legal, and regulatory landscape of artificial intelligence in Australian healthcare and ethical integration in radiography: A narrative review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This narrative review explores the ethical, legal, and regulatory landscape of AI integration in Australian healthcare, focusing on radiography. It examines the current legislative framework, assesses the trust and reliability of AI tools, and proposes future directions for ethical AI integration in radiography. AI systems significantly enhance diagnostic radiography by improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in stroke detection, brain imaging, and chest reporting. However, AI raises substantial ethical concerns due to its 'black-box' nature and potential biases in training data. The Therapeutic Goods Administration's reforms in Australia, though comprehensive, fall short of fully addressing issues related to the trustworthiness and legal liabilities of AI tools. Adopting a comprehensive research strategy that includes doctrinal, comparative, and public policy analyses will facilitate an understanding of international practices, particularly from countries with similar legal systems, and help guide Australia in refining its regulatory framework. For an ethical future in radiography, a robust, multi-disciplinary approach is required to prioritize patient safety, data privacy, and equitable AI use. A framework that balances technological innovation with ethical and legal integrity is essential for advancing healthcare while preserving trust and transparency. Healthcare professionals, policymakers, and AI developers must collaborate to establish a resilient, equitable, and transparent healthcare system. Future research should focus on multi-disciplinary methodologies, combining doctrinal, comparative, and public policy research to provide comprehensive insights. This approach will guide Australia in creating a more inclusive and ethically sound legal framework for AI in healthcare, ensuring its ethical and beneficial integration into radiography.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424004648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This narrative review explores the ethical, legal, and regulatory landscape of AI integration in Australian healthcare, focusing on radiography. It examines the current legislative framework, assesses the trust and reliability of AI tools, and proposes future directions for ethical AI integration in radiography. AI systems significantly enhance diagnostic radiography by improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in stroke detection, brain imaging, and chest reporting. However, AI raises substantial ethical concerns due to its 'black-box' nature and potential biases in training data. The Therapeutic Goods Administration's reforms in Australia, though comprehensive, fall short of fully addressing issues related to the trustworthiness and legal liabilities of AI tools. Adopting a comprehensive research strategy that includes doctrinal, comparative, and public policy analyses will facilitate an understanding of international practices, particularly from countries with similar legal systems, and help guide Australia in refining its regulatory framework. For an ethical future in radiography, a robust, multi-disciplinary approach is required to prioritize patient safety, data privacy, and equitable AI use. A framework that balances technological innovation with ethical and legal integrity is essential for advancing healthcare while preserving trust and transparency. Healthcare professionals, policymakers, and AI developers must collaborate to establish a resilient, equitable, and transparent healthcare system. Future research should focus on multi-disciplinary methodologies, combining doctrinal, comparative, and public policy research to provide comprehensive insights. This approach will guide Australia in creating a more inclusive and ethically sound legal framework for AI in healthcare, ensuring its ethical and beneficial integration into radiography.

澳大利亚医疗保健领域人工智能的伦理、法律和监管情况以及放射学中的伦理整合:叙述性综述。
这篇叙述性综述探讨了澳大利亚医疗保健领域人工智能整合的伦理、法律和监管情况,重点关注放射摄影。它研究了当前的立法框架,评估了人工智能工具的信任度和可靠性,并提出了将人工智能融入放射学的未来伦理方向。人工智能系统提高了中风检测、脑成像和胸部报告的诊断准确性和效率,从而大大增强了放射诊断能力。然而,人工智能因其 "黑箱 "性质和训练数据中的潜在偏差而引发了大量伦理问题。澳大利亚治疗用品管理局的改革虽然全面,但还不足以完全解决与人工智能工具的可信度和法律责任相关的问题。采取包括理论、比较和公共政策分析在内的综合研究策略,将有助于了解国际惯例,尤其是法律制度相似的国家的做法,并有助于指导澳大利亚完善其监管框架。为了放射学未来的伦理发展,需要采取强有力的多学科方法,优先考虑患者安全、数据隐私和人工智能的公平使用。一个兼顾技术创新与道德和法律完整性的框架,对于在维护信任和透明度的同时推进医疗保健至关重要。医疗保健专业人士、政策制定者和人工智能开发者必须通力合作,建立一个有弹性、公平和透明的医疗保健系统。未来的研究应侧重于多学科方法,结合理论、比较和公共政策研究,以提供全面的见解。这种方法将指导澳大利亚为医疗保健领域的人工智能创建一个更具包容性、更符合道德规范的法律框架,确保其符合道德规范并有益地融入放射学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
231
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信