Can you know before you go? Information about disability accommodations on US hospital websites.

Allison Kannam, Carol Haywood, Megan A Morris, Lynn Huang, Tracey Singer, Gurasees Bajaj, Aijalon Muhammad, Tara Lagu
{"title":"Can you know before you go? Information about disability accommodations on US hospital websites.","authors":"Allison Kannam, Carol Haywood, Megan A Morris, Lynn Huang, Tracey Singer, Gurasees Bajaj, Aijalon Muhammad, Tara Lagu","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with disability (PWD) face challenges accessing healthcare. Websites are a public-facing resource that can help PWD determine if a hospital can accommodate their needs, yet few studies have described whether hospital websites contain adequate accommodation information.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize the extent to which information about disability accommodations is available on US hospital websites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We manually reviewed hospital websites using a structured extraction form. We used the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital General Information Data set to identify a stratified random sample of 600 nonspecialty hospitals in the United States. We excluded hospitals that shared a website with a previously reviewed hospital for a final sample of 445. We recorded (1) content about specific disability accommodations (in 11 predetermined categories); (2) descriptions of hospital policy mentioning disability; and (3) the point of contact to obtain more information about accommodations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About two-thirds (65.6%) of sampled hospitals were acute care hospitals (vs 34.4% critical access); 53.5% had 26-299 beds. Overall, 73.7% websites had information about accommodations; of these, 36.3% had information solely within hospital policies. Of the 47.0% websites with accommodation information beyond hospital policies, the mean number of accommodations listed (excluding policy statements) was 2.37 (of 11 possible). Hospitals with 300+ beds had higher odds of listing any nonpolicy accommodations than those with 1-26 beds (odds ratio = 2.768, p = .02). Less than half (40.5%) hospitals listed a contact person.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Information about disability accommodations is sparse on hospital websites. Comprehensive and actionable communication about accommodations is needed to better protect PWD's rights to accessible healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with disability (PWD) face challenges accessing healthcare. Websites are a public-facing resource that can help PWD determine if a hospital can accommodate their needs, yet few studies have described whether hospital websites contain adequate accommodation information.

Objective: To characterize the extent to which information about disability accommodations is available on US hospital websites.

Methods: We manually reviewed hospital websites using a structured extraction form. We used the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital General Information Data set to identify a stratified random sample of 600 nonspecialty hospitals in the United States. We excluded hospitals that shared a website with a previously reviewed hospital for a final sample of 445. We recorded (1) content about specific disability accommodations (in 11 predetermined categories); (2) descriptions of hospital policy mentioning disability; and (3) the point of contact to obtain more information about accommodations.

Results: About two-thirds (65.6%) of sampled hospitals were acute care hospitals (vs 34.4% critical access); 53.5% had 26-299 beds. Overall, 73.7% websites had information about accommodations; of these, 36.3% had information solely within hospital policies. Of the 47.0% websites with accommodation information beyond hospital policies, the mean number of accommodations listed (excluding policy statements) was 2.37 (of 11 possible). Hospitals with 300+ beds had higher odds of listing any nonpolicy accommodations than those with 1-26 beds (odds ratio = 2.768, p = .02). Less than half (40.5%) hospitals listed a contact person.

Conclusions: Information about disability accommodations is sparse on hospital websites. Comprehensive and actionable communication about accommodations is needed to better protect PWD's rights to accessible healthcare.

您能在出发前了解情况吗?美国医院网站上有关残障人士便利设施的信息。
背景:残疾人(PWD)在获得医疗保健服务方面面临挑战。网站是一种面向公众的资源,可以帮助残疾人确定医院是否能满足他们的需求,但很少有研究描述医院网站是否包含足够的便利信息:目的:描述美国医院网站上提供的残疾人便利信息的程度:方法:我们使用结构化提取表人工审核了医院网站。我们使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的医院一般信息数据集,对美国 600 家非专科医院进行了分层随机抽样。我们排除了与之前审查过的医院共享网站的医院,最终样本为 445 家。我们记录了:(1) 有关具体残疾便利措施的内容(11 个预先确定的类别);(2) 提及残疾问题的医院政策描述;以及 (3) 获取更多有关便利措施信息的联系点:约三分之二(65.6%)的抽样医院为急症护理医院(34.4% 为重症护理医院);53.5% 的医院拥有 26-299 张病床。总体而言,73.7%的网站有关于住宿的信息;其中 36.3%的网站仅在医院政策中提供信息。47.0%的网站提供了医院政策以外的住宿信息,其中列出的住宿(不包括政策声明)的平均数量为 2.37(可能有 11 种)。与拥有 1-26 张病床的医院相比,拥有 300 张以上病床的医院有更高的几率列出任何非政策范围内的便利信息(几率比 = 2.768,p = .02)。不到一半(40.5%)的医院列出了联系人:结论:医院网站上有关残障人士便利措施的信息很少。为了更好地保护残疾人获得无障碍医疗服务的权利,需要对相关便利措施进行全面、可操作的宣传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信