Global Study on the Accuracy of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Diagnosis in Breast Cancer.

Josef Rüschoff, Alexander Penner, Ian O Ellis, M Elizabeth Hale Hammond, Annette Lebeau, Robert Y Osamura, Fréderique Penault-Llorca, Federico Rojo, Chirag Desai, Akira Moh, Neil Atkey, Gudrun Baenfer, Andreas H Scheel, Corrado D'Arrigo, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Giuseppe Viale
{"title":"Global Study on the Accuracy of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Diagnosis in Breast Cancer.","authors":"Josef Rüschoff, Alexander Penner, Ian O Ellis, M Elizabeth Hale Hammond, Annette Lebeau, Robert Y Osamura, Fréderique Penault-Llorca, Federico Rojo, Chirag Desai, Akira Moh, Neil Atkey, Gudrun Baenfer, Andreas H Scheel, Corrado D'Arrigo, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus, Giuseppe Viale","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0052-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Recently, a new type of antibody-drug conjugate, trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd), has been approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer with low level of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene expression. Thereby, eligibility relies on an accurate diagnosis of HER2-low status defined by immunohistochemistry IHC 1+/2+ with no gene amplification.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To assess pathologists' accuracy and training efficacy in the diagnosis of HER2-low.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Agreement rates of HER2-low scoring in breast cancer tissue were assessed between expert consensus and real-world pathologists (n = 77 from 14 countries) before and after a specific 4-hour training for HER2-low detection. Two assays were evaluated, the Ventana Pathway 4B5 CDx and the Dako HercepTest (polyclonal). Concordance of the pathologists with consensus score and efficacy of training were measured by Cohen κ, overall rater agreement, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve statistics.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>In the Ventana 4B5 HER2-low category, baseline agreement rates were >80% but <90%. Negative percentage agreement was improved from 80.6% to 91.1% by training. In the HER2-0 category, positive percentage agreement (74.6%) was the only parameter below the 80% benchmark but was significantly improved to 89.2% after training. Training efficacy was confirmed by ROC curve analysis, which shows improvement for the identification of HER2-0 and HER2-low cases. Finally, in-depth examination of cases with discordant HER2 status disclosed specific issues of HER2-low underscoring and overscoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>The ability of pathologists to achieve acceptable diagnostic accuracy in identifying patients with HER2-low breast cancer could be enhanced by short-term training. Potential routes to improve the quality of HER2-low scoring in clinical practice have been identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0052-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Recently, a new type of antibody-drug conjugate, trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd), has been approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer with low level of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene expression. Thereby, eligibility relies on an accurate diagnosis of HER2-low status defined by immunohistochemistry IHC 1+/2+ with no gene amplification.

Objective.—: To assess pathologists' accuracy and training efficacy in the diagnosis of HER2-low.

Design.—: Agreement rates of HER2-low scoring in breast cancer tissue were assessed between expert consensus and real-world pathologists (n = 77 from 14 countries) before and after a specific 4-hour training for HER2-low detection. Two assays were evaluated, the Ventana Pathway 4B5 CDx and the Dako HercepTest (polyclonal). Concordance of the pathologists with consensus score and efficacy of training were measured by Cohen κ, overall rater agreement, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve statistics.

Results.—: In the Ventana 4B5 HER2-low category, baseline agreement rates were >80% but <90%. Negative percentage agreement was improved from 80.6% to 91.1% by training. In the HER2-0 category, positive percentage agreement (74.6%) was the only parameter below the 80% benchmark but was significantly improved to 89.2% after training. Training efficacy was confirmed by ROC curve analysis, which shows improvement for the identification of HER2-0 and HER2-low cases. Finally, in-depth examination of cases with discordant HER2 status disclosed specific issues of HER2-low underscoring and overscoring.

Conclusions.—: The ability of pathologists to achieve acceptable diagnostic accuracy in identifying patients with HER2-low breast cancer could be enhanced by short-term training. Potential routes to improve the quality of HER2-low scoring in clinical practice have been identified.

关于乳腺癌中人类表皮生长因子受体 2 低诊断准确性的全球研究。
背景:最近,一种新型抗体药物共轭物曲妥珠单抗-德鲁司康(T-DXd)被批准用于治疗人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)基因表达水平较低的转移性乳腺癌。因此,治疗资格取决于免疫组化 IHC 1+/2+、无基因扩增的 HER2 低表达状态的准确诊断:评估病理学家诊断 HER2 低分化的准确性和培训效果:对专家共识和实际病理学家(来自 14 个国家的 77 名病理学家)在接受 4 小时的 HER2 低检测特定培训之前和之后,乳腺癌组织中 HER2 低评分的一致率进行评估。评估了两种检测方法:Ventana Pathway 4B5 CDx 和 Dako HercepTest(多克隆)。通过科恩κ、总体评分者一致性和接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)统计来衡量病理学家与共识评分的一致性和培训效果:在 Ventana 4B5 HER2 低分级中,基线一致率大于 80%:病理学家在识别 HER2 低的乳腺癌患者时达到可接受的诊断准确性的能力可通过短期培训得到提高。临床实践中提高 HER2 低分级质量的潜在途径已经确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信