Specifying behavioural and strategy components of de-implementation efforts targeting low-value prescribing practices in secondary health care.

Jennifer Dunsmore, Eilidh Duncan, Sara MacLennan, James N'Dow, Steven MacLennan
{"title":"Specifying behavioural and strategy components of de-implementation efforts targeting low-value prescribing practices in secondary health care.","authors":"Jennifer Dunsmore, Eilidh Duncan, Sara MacLennan, James N'Dow, Steven MacLennan","doi":"10.1186/s43058-024-00624-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>/Aims De-implementation, including the removal or reduction of unnecessary or inappropriate prescribing, is crucial to ensure patients receive appropriate evidence-based health care. The utilization of de-implementation efforts is contingent on the quality of strategy reporting. To further understand effective ways to de-implement medical practices, specification of behavioural targets and components of de-implementation strategies are required. This paper aims to critically analyse how well the behavioural targets and strategy components, in studies that focused on de-implementing unnecessary or inappropriate prescribing in secondary healthcare settings, were reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A supplementary analysis of studies included in a recently published review of de-implementation studies was conducted. Article text was coded verbatim to two established specification frameworks. Behavioural components were coded deductively to the five elements of the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) framework. Strategy components were mapped to the nine elements of the Proctor's 'measuring implementation strategies' framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The behavioural components of low-value prescribing, as coded to the AACTT framework, were generally specified well. However, the Actor and Time components were often vague or not well reported. Specification of strategy components, as coded to the Proctor framework, were less well reported. Proctor's Actor, Action target: specifying targets, Dose and Justification elements were not well reported or varied in the amount of detail offered. We also offer suggestions of additional specifications to make, such as the 'interactions' participants have with a strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Specification of behavioural targets and components of de-implementation strategies for prescribing practices can be accommodated by the AACTT and Proctor frameworks when used in conjunction. These essential details are required to understand, replicate and successfully de-implement unnecessary or inappropriate prescribing. In general, standardisation in the reporting quality of these components is required to replicate any de-implementation efforts.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11304722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00624-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: /Aims De-implementation, including the removal or reduction of unnecessary or inappropriate prescribing, is crucial to ensure patients receive appropriate evidence-based health care. The utilization of de-implementation efforts is contingent on the quality of strategy reporting. To further understand effective ways to de-implement medical practices, specification of behavioural targets and components of de-implementation strategies are required. This paper aims to critically analyse how well the behavioural targets and strategy components, in studies that focused on de-implementing unnecessary or inappropriate prescribing in secondary healthcare settings, were reported.

Methods: A supplementary analysis of studies included in a recently published review of de-implementation studies was conducted. Article text was coded verbatim to two established specification frameworks. Behavioural components were coded deductively to the five elements of the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) framework. Strategy components were mapped to the nine elements of the Proctor's 'measuring implementation strategies' framework.

Results: The behavioural components of low-value prescribing, as coded to the AACTT framework, were generally specified well. However, the Actor and Time components were often vague or not well reported. Specification of strategy components, as coded to the Proctor framework, were less well reported. Proctor's Actor, Action target: specifying targets, Dose and Justification elements were not well reported or varied in the amount of detail offered. We also offer suggestions of additional specifications to make, such as the 'interactions' participants have with a strategy.

Conclusion: Specification of behavioural targets and components of de-implementation strategies for prescribing practices can be accommodated by the AACTT and Proctor frameworks when used in conjunction. These essential details are required to understand, replicate and successfully de-implement unnecessary or inappropriate prescribing. In general, standardisation in the reporting quality of these components is required to replicate any de-implementation efforts.

Trial registration: Not registered.

明确针对二级医疗机构低价值处方做法的取消实施工作的行为和策略组成部分。
背景:/取消执行,包括取消或减少不必要或不适当的处方,对于确保患者获得适当的循证医疗服务至关重要。取消执行工作的利用率取决于策略报告的质量。为了进一步了解取消医疗实践的有效方法,需要明确取消实施策略的行为目标和组成部分。本文旨在批判性地分析有关在二级医疗机构中取消不必要或不适当处方的研究中,行为目标和策略组成部分的报告质量如何:方法:对最近发表的一篇关于取消实施研究的综述中所包含的研究进行了补充分析。根据两个既定的规范框架对文章文本进行逐字编码。将行为部分与行动、行动者、背景、目标、时间(AACTT)框架的五个要素进行演绎编码。策略部分与 Proctor 的 "衡量实施策略 "框架的九个要素相对应:结果:根据 AACTT 框架对低价值处方的行为要素进行了编码,这些行为要素总体上得到了很好的界定。然而,"行为者 "和 "时间 "部分往往含糊不清或没有很好地报告。按照 Proctor 框架编码的策略要素的具体说明则报告得较少。Proctor 的 "行为者"、"行动目标:具体目标"、"剂量 "和 "理由 "等要素的报告不够详尽,或提供的细节不尽相同。我们还提出了其他具体说明的建议,例如参与者与策略之间的 "互动":结论:当 AACTT 和 Proctor 框架结合使用时,可以对处方实践中的行为目标和取消实施策略的组成部分进行说明。要了解、复制并成功地取消不必要或不适当的处方,就必须掌握这些基本细节。一般来说,需要对这些组成部分的报告质量进行标准化,以推广任何去实施化的努力:未注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信