The impact of systematically repairing multiple choice questions with low discrimination on assessment reliability: an interrupted time series analysis.

Canadian medical education journal Pub Date : 2024-07-12 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.36834/cmej.77596
Janeve Desy, Adrian Harvey, Sarah Weeks, Kevin D Busche, Kerri Martin, Michael Paget, Christopher Naugler, Kevin McLaughlin
{"title":"The impact of systematically repairing multiple choice questions with low discrimination on assessment reliability: an interrupted time series analysis.","authors":"Janeve Desy, Adrian Harvey, Sarah Weeks, Kevin D Busche, Kerri Martin, Michael Paget, Christopher Naugler, Kevin McLaughlin","doi":"10.36834/cmej.77596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At our centre, we introduced a continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiative during academic year 2018-19 targeting for repair multiple choice question (MCQ) items with discrimination index (<i>D</i>) < 0.1. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of this initiative on reliability/internal consistency of our assessments. Our participants were medical students during academic years 2015-16 to 2020-21 and our data were summative MCQ assessments during this time. Since the goal was to systematically review and improve summative assessments in our undergraduate program on an ongoing basis, we used interrupted time series analysis to assess the impact on reliability. Between 2015-16 and 2017-18 there was a significant negative trend in the mean alpha coefficient for MCQ exams (regression coefficient -0.027 [-0.008, -0.047], <i>p</i> = 0.024). In the academic year following the introduction of our initiative (2018-19) there was a significant increase in the mean alpha coefficient (regression coefficient 0.113 [0.063, 0.163], <i>p</i> = 0.010) which was then followed by a significant positive post-intervention trend (regression coefficient 0.056 [0.037, 0.075], <i>p</i> = 0.006). In conclusion, our CQI intervention resulted in an immediate and progressive improvement reliability of our MCQ assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At our centre, we introduced a continuous quality improvement (CQI) initiative during academic year 2018-19 targeting for repair multiple choice question (MCQ) items with discrimination index (D) < 0.1. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of this initiative on reliability/internal consistency of our assessments. Our participants were medical students during academic years 2015-16 to 2020-21 and our data were summative MCQ assessments during this time. Since the goal was to systematically review and improve summative assessments in our undergraduate program on an ongoing basis, we used interrupted time series analysis to assess the impact on reliability. Between 2015-16 and 2017-18 there was a significant negative trend in the mean alpha coefficient for MCQ exams (regression coefficient -0.027 [-0.008, -0.047], p = 0.024). In the academic year following the introduction of our initiative (2018-19) there was a significant increase in the mean alpha coefficient (regression coefficient 0.113 [0.063, 0.163], p = 0.010) which was then followed by a significant positive post-intervention trend (regression coefficient 0.056 [0.037, 0.075], p = 0.006). In conclusion, our CQI intervention resulted in an immediate and progressive improvement reliability of our MCQ assessments.

系统修复低区分度选择题对评估可靠性的影响:间断时间序列分析。
我们中心在2018-19学年引入了一项持续质量改进(CQI)措施,目标是修复辨别指数(D)<0.1的选择题(MCQ)项目。本研究旨在评估这一举措对我们评估的可靠性/内部一致性的影响。我们的参与者是 2015-16 学年至 2020-21 学年的医学生,我们的数据是这一时期的终结性 MCQ 评估。由于我们的目标是持续系统地审查和改进本科课程中的终结性评估,因此我们采用了间断时间序列分析法来评估对可靠性的影响。在2015-16学年至2017-18学年期间,MCQ考试的平均α系数呈显著的负趋势(回归系数-0.027 [-0.008, -0.047],p = 0.024)。在引入我们的举措后的学年(2018-19 学年),平均阿尔法系数显著增加(回归系数 0.113 [0.063, 0.163],p = 0.010),随后出现显著的正干预后趋势(回归系数 0.056 [0.037, 0.075],p = 0.006)。总之,我们的 CQI 干预措施立即并逐步提高了 MCQ 评估的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信