Prognostic Implications of Selective Dissection of Left Lower Paratracheal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Left-Sided Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Q4 Medicine
Journal of Chest Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-05 Epub Date: 2024-08-08 DOI:10.5090/jcs.24.022
Hyo Kyen Park, Yelee Kwon, Geun Dong Lee, Sehoon Choi, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Yong-Hee Kim, Dong Kwan Kim, Seung-Il Park, Jae Kwang Yun
{"title":"Prognostic Implications of Selective Dissection of Left Lower Paratracheal Lymph Nodes in Patients with Left-Sided Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Hyo Kyen Park, Yelee Kwon, Geun Dong Lee, Sehoon Choi, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Yong-Hee Kim, Dong Kwan Kim, Seung-Il Park, Jae Kwang Yun","doi":"10.5090/jcs.24.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to examine the clinical implications of selective station 4L lymph node dissection (S4L-LND) on survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate its potential advantages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled patients with primary left-sided NSCLC who underwent upfront video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with R0 resection including lobectomy and segmentectomy, with or without S4L-LND, at our institution between January 2007 and December 2021. Following 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), we compared overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between patients with and without S4L-LND.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 2,601 patients, of whom 1,126 underwent S4L-LND and 1,475 did not. PSM yielded 1,036 patient pairs. Among those who underwent S4L-LND, 87 (7.7%) exhibited S4L-LN involvement. Neither OS (p=0.12) nor RFS (p=0.24) differed significantly between matched patients with and without S4L-LND. In patients with S4L-LN involvement, metastases were more common in the left upper lobe (LUL) than in the left lower lobe (LLL) (3.6% vs. 2.0%, p=0.061). Metastasis became significantly more frequent with more advanced clinical N (cN) stage (cN0, 2.3%; cN1, 5.8%; cN2, 32.6%; p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that cN stage and tumor location were independently associated with S4L-LN involvement (p<0.001 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OS and RFS did not differ significantly between matched patients with and without S4L-LND. Among participants with S4L-LN involvement, metastases occurred more frequently in the LUL than the LLL, and their incidence increased significantly with more advanced cN stage. Thus, patients with LUL or advanced cN lung cancers may benefit from S4L-LND.</p>","PeriodicalId":34499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chest Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11392705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chest Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/jcs.24.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to examine the clinical implications of selective station 4L lymph node dissection (S4L-LND) on survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate its potential advantages.

Methods: We enrolled patients with primary left-sided NSCLC who underwent upfront video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with R0 resection including lobectomy and segmentectomy, with or without S4L-LND, at our institution between January 2007 and December 2021. Following 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), we compared overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between patients with and without S4L-LND.

Results: The study included 2,601 patients, of whom 1,126 underwent S4L-LND and 1,475 did not. PSM yielded 1,036 patient pairs. Among those who underwent S4L-LND, 87 (7.7%) exhibited S4L-LN involvement. Neither OS (p=0.12) nor RFS (p=0.24) differed significantly between matched patients with and without S4L-LND. In patients with S4L-LN involvement, metastases were more common in the left upper lobe (LUL) than in the left lower lobe (LLL) (3.6% vs. 2.0%, p=0.061). Metastasis became significantly more frequent with more advanced clinical N (cN) stage (cN0, 2.3%; cN1, 5.8%; cN2, 32.6%; p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that cN stage and tumor location were independently associated with S4L-LN involvement (p<0.001 for both).

Conclusion: OS and RFS did not differ significantly between matched patients with and without S4L-LND. Among participants with S4L-LN involvement, metastases occurred more frequently in the LUL than the LLL, and their incidence increased significantly with more advanced cN stage. Thus, patients with LUL or advanced cN lung cancers may benefit from S4L-LND.

左侧非小细胞肺癌患者气管旁左下淋巴结选择性切除术的预后意义
背景:本研究旨在探讨选择性站4L淋巴结清扫术(S4L-LND)对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)生存率的临床影响,并评估其潜在优势:本研究旨在探讨选择性4L站淋巴结清扫术(S4L-LND)对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)生存率的临床影响,并评估其潜在优势:我们招募了2007年1月至2021年12月期间在本院接受前期视频辅助胸腔镜手术R0切除术(包括肺叶切除术和肺段切除术)并进行或不进行S4L-LND的原发性左侧NSCLC患者。在进行1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,我们比较了有S4L-LND和无S4L-LND患者的总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS):研究共纳入 2,601 例患者,其中 1,126 例接受了 S4L-LND 治疗,1,475 例未接受 S4L-LND 治疗。PSM得出了1,036对患者。在接受S4L-LND治疗的患者中,有87人(7.7%)表现为S4L-LN受累。有S4L-LND和没有S4L-LND的配对患者的OS(p=0.12)和RFS(p=0.24)均无明显差异。在S4L-LN受累的患者中,左上肺叶(LUL)转移比左下肺叶(LLL)转移更常见(3.6% vs. 2.0%,p=0.061)。临床N(cN)分期越晚,转移的发生率越高(cN0,2.3%;cN1,5.8%;cN2,32.6%;P结论:有S4L-LND和没有S4L-LND的配对患者的OS和RFS没有明显差异。在S4L-LN受累的患者中,LUL的转移发生率高于LLL,其发生率随cN分期越晚而显著增加。因此,LUL或晚期cN肺癌患者可能会从S4L-LND中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chest Surgery
Journal of Chest Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信