Methylphenidate Reversal of Dexmedetomidine-Induced Versus Ketamine-Induced Sedation in Rats.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kathleen F Vincent, Gwi H Park, Brendan M Stapley, Emmaline J Dillon, Ken Solt
{"title":"Methylphenidate Reversal of Dexmedetomidine-Induced Versus Ketamine-Induced Sedation in Rats.","authors":"Kathleen F Vincent, Gwi H Park, Brendan M Stapley, Emmaline J Dillon, Ken Solt","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dexmedetomidine and ketamine have long elimination half-lives in humans and have no clinically approved reversal agents. Methylphenidate enhances dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission by inhibiting reuptake transporters for these arousal-promoting neurotransmitters. Previous studies in rats demonstrated that intravenous methylphenidate induces emergence from isoflurane and propofol general anesthesia. These 2 anesthetics are thought to act primarily through enhancement of inhibitory Gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors. In this study, we tested the behavioral and neurophysiological effects of methylphenidate in rats after low and high doses of dexmedetomidine (an alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist) and ketamine (an N-methyl-D-aspartate [NMDA] receptor antagonist) that induce sedation and unconsciousness, respectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All experiments used adult male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 32 total) and all drugs were administered intravenously in a crossover, blinded experimental design. Locomotion after sedating doses of dexmedetomidine (10 µg/kg) or ketamine (10 mg/kg) with and without methylphenidate (5 mg/kg) was tested using the open field test (n = 16). Recovery of righting reflex after either high-dose dexmedetomidine (50 µg/kg) or high-dose ketamine (50 mg/kg) with and without methylphenidate (1-5 mg/kg) was assessed in a second cohort of rats (n = 8). Finally, in a third cohort of rats (n = 8), frontal electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded for spectral analysis under both low and high doses of dexmedetomidine and ketamine with and without methylphenidate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low-dose dexmedetomidine reduced locomotion by 94% in rats. Methylphenidate restored locomotion after low-dose dexmedetomidine (rank difference = 88.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 70.8-106) and the effect was blocked by coadministration with a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist (rank difference = 86.2, 95% CI, 68.6-104). Low-dose ketamine transiently attenuated mobility by 58% and was not improved with methylphenidate. Methylphenidate did not affect the return of righting reflex latency in rats after high-dose dexmedetomidine nor ketamine. Frontal EEG analysis revealed that methylphenidate reversed spectral changes induced by low-dose dexmedetomidine (F [8,87] = 3.27, P = .003) but produced only transient changes after high-dose dexmedetomidine. Methylphenidate did not induce spectral changes in the EEG after low- or high-dose ketamine.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Methylphenidate reversed behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of sedation, but not unconsciousness, induced by dexmedetomidine. In contrast, methylphenidate did not affect sedation, unconsciousness, nor EEG signatures in rats after ketamine. These findings suggest that methylphenidate may be efficacious to reverse dexmedetomidine sedation in humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dexmedetomidine and ketamine have long elimination half-lives in humans and have no clinically approved reversal agents. Methylphenidate enhances dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission by inhibiting reuptake transporters for these arousal-promoting neurotransmitters. Previous studies in rats demonstrated that intravenous methylphenidate induces emergence from isoflurane and propofol general anesthesia. These 2 anesthetics are thought to act primarily through enhancement of inhibitory Gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors. In this study, we tested the behavioral and neurophysiological effects of methylphenidate in rats after low and high doses of dexmedetomidine (an alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist) and ketamine (an N-methyl-D-aspartate [NMDA] receptor antagonist) that induce sedation and unconsciousness, respectively.

Methods: All experiments used adult male and female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 32 total) and all drugs were administered intravenously in a crossover, blinded experimental design. Locomotion after sedating doses of dexmedetomidine (10 µg/kg) or ketamine (10 mg/kg) with and without methylphenidate (5 mg/kg) was tested using the open field test (n = 16). Recovery of righting reflex after either high-dose dexmedetomidine (50 µg/kg) or high-dose ketamine (50 mg/kg) with and without methylphenidate (1-5 mg/kg) was assessed in a second cohort of rats (n = 8). Finally, in a third cohort of rats (n = 8), frontal electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded for spectral analysis under both low and high doses of dexmedetomidine and ketamine with and without methylphenidate.

Results: Low-dose dexmedetomidine reduced locomotion by 94% in rats. Methylphenidate restored locomotion after low-dose dexmedetomidine (rank difference = 88.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 70.8-106) and the effect was blocked by coadministration with a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist (rank difference = 86.2, 95% CI, 68.6-104). Low-dose ketamine transiently attenuated mobility by 58% and was not improved with methylphenidate. Methylphenidate did not affect the return of righting reflex latency in rats after high-dose dexmedetomidine nor ketamine. Frontal EEG analysis revealed that methylphenidate reversed spectral changes induced by low-dose dexmedetomidine (F [8,87] = 3.27, P = .003) but produced only transient changes after high-dose dexmedetomidine. Methylphenidate did not induce spectral changes in the EEG after low- or high-dose ketamine.

Conclusions: Methylphenidate reversed behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of sedation, but not unconsciousness, induced by dexmedetomidine. In contrast, methylphenidate did not affect sedation, unconsciousness, nor EEG signatures in rats after ketamine. These findings suggest that methylphenidate may be efficacious to reverse dexmedetomidine sedation in humans.

哌醋甲酯可逆转右美托咪定诱导的大鼠镇静作用与氯胺酮诱导的大鼠镇静作用。
背景:右美托咪定和氯胺酮在人体内的消除半衰期很长,而且没有临床认可的逆转剂。哌醋甲酯可抑制多巴胺能和去甲肾上腺素能神经递质的再摄取转运体,从而增强这些促进唤醒神经递质的神经递质。此前对大鼠进行的研究表明,静脉注射哌醋甲酯可诱导大鼠从异氟醚和异丙酚全身麻醉中苏醒。这两种麻醉剂被认为主要通过增强抑制性γ-氨基丁酸A型(GABAA)受体发挥作用。在本研究中,我们测试了哌醋甲酯在大鼠体内使用低剂量和高剂量右美托咪定(一种α-2肾上腺素能受体激动剂)和氯胺酮(一种N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸[NMDA]受体拮抗剂)分别诱导镇静和昏迷后的行为和神经生理学效应:所有实验均使用成年雄性和雌性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠(共 32 只),所有药物均以交叉、盲法实验设计进行静脉注射。在使用或不使用哌醋甲酯(5 毫克/千克)的情况下,使用右美托咪定(10 微克/千克)或氯胺酮(10 毫克/千克)镇静剂后,使用开阔地试验测试大鼠的运动能力(n = 16)。第二组大鼠(n = 8)在使用或未使用哌醋甲酯(1-5 毫克/千克)的大剂量右美托咪定(50 微克/千克)或大剂量氯胺酮(50 毫克/千克)后,评估了右反射的恢复情况。最后,在第三组大鼠(n = 8)中,记录了低剂量和高剂量右美托咪定和氯胺酮(含或不含哌醋甲酯)的额叶脑电图(EEG),以进行频谱分析:结果:低剂量右美托咪定使大鼠的运动减少了 94%。哌醋甲酯可恢复低剂量右美托咪定的运动能力(等级差异 = 88.5,95% 置信区间 [CI],70.8-106),与多巴胺 D1 受体拮抗剂联合给药可阻断该作用(等级差异 = 86.2,95% 置信区间 [CI],68.6-104)。小剂量氯胺酮可使活动能力短暂减弱 58%,但哌醋甲酯并不能改善这种情况。大鼠服用大剂量右美托咪定或氯胺酮后,哌醋甲酯不会影响其右侧反射潜伏期的恢复。额叶脑电图分析表明,哌醋甲酯可逆转小剂量右美托咪定引起的频谱变化(F [8,87] = 3.27,P = .003),但在大剂量右美托咪定后只产生短暂的变化。哌醋甲酯在低剂量或高剂量氯胺酮后不会引起脑电图的频谱变化:结论:哌醋甲酯能逆转右美托咪定引起的镇静的行为和神经生理学相关性,但不能逆转昏迷。相反,哌醋甲酯不会影响大鼠在氯胺酮作用下的镇静、昏迷或脑电图特征。这些研究结果表明,哌醋甲酯可有效逆转右美托咪定对人体的镇静作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信