NAP7 – something for everyone

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1111/anae.16405
Mike Charlesworth
{"title":"NAP7 – something for everyone","authors":"Mike Charlesworth","doi":"10.1111/anae.16405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ward and Iliff suggest there have been too many NAP7 papers [<span>1</span>], which makes it difficult to discern and retain key information [<span>2</span>]. All 12 papers went through our normal peer review processes and were judged by their own merit to have met or exceeded the standards required for publication. The series was spread over two years, with the reporting of the methods first (September 2022, 5200 downloads) followed by the activity survey (March 2023, 9200 downloads), the five main results papers (November 2023, 21,500 downloads) and several specialist papers focusing on topics such as obstetrics [<span>3</span>], anaphylaxis [<span>4</span>], airway management [<span>5</span>] and resuscitation decisions [<span>6</span>].</p><p>Peri-operative cardiac arrest is a broad topic encompassing all areas of clinical practice. This perhaps explains why so much data were collected and analysed. Dissemination was through a combination of gold open-access publishing; posts on social media platforms (&gt; 1 million cumulative impressions); author interviews (&gt; 67,000 viewers); and podcasts (&gt; 4200 listens). That said, the content of a paper is always superior to the means of dissemination, and there remains no substitute for reading a published paper in full, critiquing the methods used and contextualising the conclusions reported. Anyone who feels NAP7 has passed them by would benefit from reading the main results papers from November 2023 and any of those relating to their specialist area(s) of practice published thereafter. While supplementary materials such as infographics are sometimes helpful, readers will always benefit more from engaging with the primary published material and reflecting on key messages relevant to their area of practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anae.16405","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16405","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ward and Iliff suggest there have been too many NAP7 papers [1], which makes it difficult to discern and retain key information [2]. All 12 papers went through our normal peer review processes and were judged by their own merit to have met or exceeded the standards required for publication. The series was spread over two years, with the reporting of the methods first (September 2022, 5200 downloads) followed by the activity survey (March 2023, 9200 downloads), the five main results papers (November 2023, 21,500 downloads) and several specialist papers focusing on topics such as obstetrics [3], anaphylaxis [4], airway management [5] and resuscitation decisions [6].

Peri-operative cardiac arrest is a broad topic encompassing all areas of clinical practice. This perhaps explains why so much data were collected and analysed. Dissemination was through a combination of gold open-access publishing; posts on social media platforms (> 1 million cumulative impressions); author interviews (> 67,000 viewers); and podcasts (> 4200 listens). That said, the content of a paper is always superior to the means of dissemination, and there remains no substitute for reading a published paper in full, critiquing the methods used and contextualising the conclusions reported. Anyone who feels NAP7 has passed them by would benefit from reading the main results papers from November 2023 and any of those relating to their specialist area(s) of practice published thereafter. While supplementary materials such as infographics are sometimes helpful, readers will always benefit more from engaging with the primary published material and reflecting on key messages relevant to their area of practice.

NAP7 - 每个人都能找到自己想要的东西。
Ward和Iliff认为,NAP7论文数量过多[1],难以辨别和保留关键信息[2]。所有 12 篇论文都经过了我们正常的同行评审程序,并根据其本身的价值被判定为达到或超过了发表所需的标准。该系列论文分两年发表,首先是方法报告(2022 年 9 月,5200 次下载),然后是活动调查(2023 年 3 月,9200 次下载)、五篇主要结果论文(2023 年 11 月,21500 次下载)以及几篇关注产科[3]、过敏性休克[4]、气道管理[5]和复苏决策[6]等主题的专业论文。围手术期心脏骤停是一个广泛的话题,涵盖了临床实践的所有领域,这或许解释了为什么要收集和分析如此多的数据。传播的方式包括黄金开放存取出版、在社交媒体平台上发帖(累计100万次)、作者访谈(6.7万名观众)和播客(4200次收听)。尽管如此,论文的内容始终优于传播的手段,全文阅读已发表的论文、批评所使用的方法并结合所报告的结论,仍然是无可替代的。任何认为 NAP7 与自己擦肩而过的人都可以从阅读 2023 年 11 月的主要成果论文以及此后发表的与其专业领域相关的论文中获益。虽然信息图表等补充材料有时会有所帮助,但读者始终会从阅读主要出版材料和思考与其实践领域相关的关键信息中获益更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信