A pilot study of optical coherence tomography-guided transbronchial biopsy in peripheral pulmonary lesions.

Expert review of medical devices Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2024.2389235
Guanghong Zhou, Yan Yang, Yi Liao, Lijuan Chen, Yang Yang, Jun Zou
{"title":"A pilot study of optical coherence tomography-guided transbronchial biopsy in peripheral pulmonary lesions.","authors":"Guanghong Zhou, Yan Yang, Yi Liao, Lijuan Chen, Yang Yang, Jun Zou","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2389235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) remains challenging. Despite advancements in guided transbronchial biopsy (TBB) techniques, diagnostic yields haven't reached ideal levels. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been developed for application in pulmonary diseases, yet no data existed evaluating effectiveness in diagnosing PPLs.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study included patients who underwent OCT and radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS)-guided TBB. OCT and R-EBUS imaging features were analyzed to differentiate between benign and malignant PPLs and subtypes of lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 patients were included in this study. The diagnostic yield of OCT-guided TBB stood at 56.18%, R-EBUS-guided TBB was 83.15% (P<0.01). The accuracy of OCT to judge the nature of lesions was 92.59%, while R-EBUS was 77.92%. The accuracy of OCT in predicting squamous carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma were both 91.30%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the diagnostic yield of OCT-guided TBB fell short of that achieved by R-EBUS, OCT possessed the capability to judge the nature of lesions and guide the pathological classification of malignant lesions. Further extensive prospective studies are necessary to thoroughly assess the characteristics of this procedure.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/ identifier is NCT06419114.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2389235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) remains challenging. Despite advancements in guided transbronchial biopsy (TBB) techniques, diagnostic yields haven't reached ideal levels. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been developed for application in pulmonary diseases, yet no data existed evaluating effectiveness in diagnosing PPLs.

Research design and methods: This study included patients who underwent OCT and radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS)-guided TBB. OCT and R-EBUS imaging features were analyzed to differentiate between benign and malignant PPLs and subtypes of lung cancer.

Results: A total of 89 patients were included in this study. The diagnostic yield of OCT-guided TBB stood at 56.18%, R-EBUS-guided TBB was 83.15% (P<0.01). The accuracy of OCT to judge the nature of lesions was 92.59%, while R-EBUS was 77.92%. The accuracy of OCT in predicting squamous carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma were both 91.30%.

Conclusions: Although the diagnostic yield of OCT-guided TBB fell short of that achieved by R-EBUS, OCT possessed the capability to judge the nature of lesions and guide the pathological classification of malignant lesions. Further extensive prospective studies are necessary to thoroughly assess the characteristics of this procedure.

Clinical trial registration: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/ identifier is NCT06419114.

光学相干断层扫描引导下经支气管活组织检查外周肺部病变的试点研究。
背景:肺外周病变(PPL)的诊断仍然具有挑战性。尽管经支气管活检(TBB)技术不断进步,但诊断率仍未达到理想水平。光学相干断层扫描(OCT)已被开发应用于肺部疾病,但尚无数据评估其在诊断PPLs方面的有效性:本研究纳入了接受 OCT 和径向支气管内超声(R-EBUS)引导的 TBB 的患者。对 OCT 和 R-EBUS 的成像特征进行分析,以区分良性和恶性 PPLs 以及肺癌的亚型:本研究共纳入 89 例患者。OCT引导下的TBB诊断率为56.18%,R-EBUS引导下的TBB诊断率为83.15%:虽然OCT引导下的TBB诊断率低于R-EBUS,但OCT具有判断病变性质和指导恶性病变病理分类的能力。有必要进一步开展广泛的前瞻性研究,以全面评估该手术的特点。临床试验注册:https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/ 识别码为 NCT06419114。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信