Predictive Data Analytics in Telecare and Telehealth: Systematic Scoping Review.

Euan Anderson, Marilyn Lennon, Kimberley Kavanagh, Natalie Weir, David Kernaghan, Marc Roper, Emma Dunlop, Linda Lapp
{"title":"Predictive Data Analytics in Telecare and Telehealth: Systematic Scoping Review.","authors":"Euan Anderson, Marilyn Lennon, Kimberley Kavanagh, Natalie Weir, David Kernaghan, Marc Roper, Emma Dunlop, Linda Lapp","doi":"10.2196/57618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telecare and telehealth are important care-at-home services used to support individuals to live more independently at home. Historically, these technologies have reactively responded to issues. However, there has been a recent drive to make better use of the data from these services to facilitate more proactive and predictive care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review seeks to explore the ways in which predictive data analytics techniques have been applied in telecare and telehealth in at-home settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist was adhered to alongside Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. English language papers published in MEDLINE, Embase, and Social Science Premium Collection between 2012 and 2022 were considered and results were screened against inclusion or exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 86 papers were included in this review. The types of analytics featuring in this review can be categorized as anomaly detection (n=21), diagnosis (n=32), prediction (n=22), and activity recognition (n=11). The most common health conditions represented were Parkinson disease (n=12) and cardiovascular conditions (n=11). The main findings include: a lack of use of routinely collected data; a dominance of diagnostic tools; and barriers and opportunities that exist, such as including patient-reported outcomes, for future predictive analytics in telecare and telehealth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All papers in this review were small-scale pilots and, as such, future research should seek to apply these predictive techniques into larger trials. Additionally, further integration of routinely collected care data and patient-reported outcomes into predictive models in telecare and telehealth offer significant opportunities to improve the analytics being performed and should be explored further. Data sets used must be of suitable size and diversity, ensuring that models are generalizable to a wider population and can be appropriately trained, validated, and tested.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"16 ","pages":"e57618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online journal of public health informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/57618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telecare and telehealth are important care-at-home services used to support individuals to live more independently at home. Historically, these technologies have reactively responded to issues. However, there has been a recent drive to make better use of the data from these services to facilitate more proactive and predictive care.

Objective: This review seeks to explore the ways in which predictive data analytics techniques have been applied in telecare and telehealth in at-home settings.

Methods: The PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist was adhered to alongside Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. English language papers published in MEDLINE, Embase, and Social Science Premium Collection between 2012 and 2022 were considered and results were screened against inclusion or exclusion criteria.

Results: In total, 86 papers were included in this review. The types of analytics featuring in this review can be categorized as anomaly detection (n=21), diagnosis (n=32), prediction (n=22), and activity recognition (n=11). The most common health conditions represented were Parkinson disease (n=12) and cardiovascular conditions (n=11). The main findings include: a lack of use of routinely collected data; a dominance of diagnostic tools; and barriers and opportunities that exist, such as including patient-reported outcomes, for future predictive analytics in telecare and telehealth.

Conclusions: All papers in this review were small-scale pilots and, as such, future research should seek to apply these predictive techniques into larger trials. Additionally, further integration of routinely collected care data and patient-reported outcomes into predictive models in telecare and telehealth offer significant opportunities to improve the analytics being performed and should be explored further. Data sets used must be of suitable size and diversity, ensuring that models are generalizable to a wider population and can be appropriately trained, validated, and tested.

远程护理和远程保健中的预测数据分析:系统性范围审查。
背景:远程护理和远程保健是重要的居家护理服务,用于支持个人在家中更加独立地生活。一直以来,这些技术都是对问题做出反应。然而,最近有一股力量在推动更好地利用这些服务的数据,以促进更积极主动的预测性护理:本综述旨在探讨预测性数据分析技术如何应用于居家环境中的远程护理和远程保健:方法:采用 PRISMA-ScR(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extended for Scoping Reviews)核对表以及 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的方法论框架。研究考虑了 2012 年至 2022 年期间在 MEDLINE、Embase 和社会科学高级文库中发表的英文论文,并根据纳入或排除标准对结果进行了筛选:本综述共收录了 86 篇论文。本综述中的分析类型可分为异常检测(21 篇)、诊断(32 篇)、预测(22 篇)和活动识别(11 篇)。最常见的健康状况是帕金森病(12 人)和心血管疾病(11 人)。主要发现包括:缺乏对常规收集数据的使用;诊断工具占主导地位;存在的障碍和机遇,如包括患者报告的结果,未来远程护理和远程保健中的预测分析:本综述中的所有论文都是小规模试点,因此,未来的研究应寻求将这些预测技术应用到更大规模的试验中。此外,将日常收集的护理数据和患者报告的结果进一步整合到远程护理和远程保健的预测模型中,为改进正在进行的分析提供了重要机会,应进一步加以探索。所使用的数据集必须具有适当的规模和多样性,以确保模型可推广到更广泛的人群,并能进行适当的训练、验证和测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信