Aiming for transformations in power: lessons from intersectoral CBPR with public housing tenants (Québec, Canada).

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Stephanie Radziszewski, Janie Houle, Corentin Montiel, Jean-Marc Fontan, Juan Torres, Kate Frolich, Antoine Boivin, Simon Coulombe, Hélène Gaudreau
{"title":"Aiming for transformations in power: lessons from intersectoral CBPR with public housing tenants (Québec, Canada).","authors":"Stephanie Radziszewski, Janie Houle, Corentin Montiel, Jean-Marc Fontan, Juan Torres, Kate Frolich, Antoine Boivin, Simon Coulombe, Hélène Gaudreau","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daae085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intersectoral collaborations are recommended as effective strategies to reduce health inequalities. People most affected by health inequalities, as are people living in poverty, remain generally absent from such intersectoral collaborations. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) projects can be leveraged to better understand how to involve people with lived experience to support both individual and community empowerment. In this paper, we offer a critical reflection on a CBPR project conducted in public housing in Québec, Canada, that aimed to develop intersectoral collaboration between tenants and senior executives from four sectors (housing, health, city and community organizations). This single qualitative case study design consisted of fieldwork documents, observations and semi-structured interviews. Using the Emancipatory Power Framework (EPF) and the Limiting Power Framework (LPF), we describe examples of types of power and resistance shown by the tenants, the intersectoral partners and the research team. The discussion presents lessons learned through the study, including the importance for research teams to reflect on their own power, especially when aiming to reduce health inequalities. The paper concludes by describing the limitations of the analyses conducted through the EPF-LPF frameworks and suggestions to increase the transformative power of future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11304601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intersectoral collaborations are recommended as effective strategies to reduce health inequalities. People most affected by health inequalities, as are people living in poverty, remain generally absent from such intersectoral collaborations. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) projects can be leveraged to better understand how to involve people with lived experience to support both individual and community empowerment. In this paper, we offer a critical reflection on a CBPR project conducted in public housing in Québec, Canada, that aimed to develop intersectoral collaboration between tenants and senior executives from four sectors (housing, health, city and community organizations). This single qualitative case study design consisted of fieldwork documents, observations and semi-structured interviews. Using the Emancipatory Power Framework (EPF) and the Limiting Power Framework (LPF), we describe examples of types of power and resistance shown by the tenants, the intersectoral partners and the research team. The discussion presents lessons learned through the study, including the importance for research teams to reflect on their own power, especially when aiming to reduce health inequalities. The paper concludes by describing the limitations of the analyses conducted through the EPF-LPF frameworks and suggestions to increase the transformative power of future studies.

以权力变革为目标:与公共住房租户开展跨部门 CBPR 的经验教训(加拿大魁北克省)。
部门间合作被推荐为减少健康不平等的有效战略。受健康不平等影响最严重的人群,如生活贫困的人群,仍然普遍缺席此类跨部门合作。以社区为基础的参与式研究(CBPR)项目可以更好地了解如何让有生活经验的人参与进来,以支持个人和社区的赋权。在本文中,我们对在加拿大魁北克省公共住房开展的 CBPR 项目进行了批判性反思,该项目旨在发展租户与来自四个部门(住房、卫生、城市和社区组织)的高级管理人员之间的跨部门合作。这项单一的定性案例研究设计包括实地工作文件、观察和半结构化访谈。我们利用解放权力框架(EPF)和限制权力框架(LPF),描述了租户、跨部门合作伙伴和研究团队所表现出的权力和抵制类型。讨论介绍了通过研究获得的经验教训,包括研究团队反思自身权力的重要性,尤其是在旨在减少健康不平等的情况下。最后,论文阐述了通过 EPF-LPF 框架进行分析的局限性,并就如何提高未来研究的变革力提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信