Comparative analysis of dual immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy versus immune checkpoint inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor combination therapy for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombosis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Kazuhiko Yoshida, Naoki Nagasaka, Tsunenori Kondo, Yuki Kobari, Hiroki Ishihara, Hironori Fukuda, Junpei Iizuka, Hideki Ishida, Toshio Takagi
{"title":"Comparative analysis of dual immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy versus immune checkpoint inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor combination therapy for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombosis.","authors":"Kazuhiko Yoshida, Naoki Nagasaka, Tsunenori Kondo, Yuki Kobari, Hiroki Ishihara, Hironori Fukuda, Junpei Iizuka, Hideki Ishida, Toshio Takagi","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02598-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus ICI combination therapy or ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination therapy is useful for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava tumor thrombosis (IVCTT) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated the therapeutic effects and incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) associated with ICI-based combination therapy in 36 patients with advanced RCC with IVCTT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age at initiation of treatment was 71 years; the IVCTT stages were cT3b in 22 patients and cT3c in 14. The ICI-ICI and ICI-TKI groups comprised 15 and 21 patients, respectively. Median tumor shrinkage at the best response showed that the primary tumor diameter decreased by 1.8 cm (22%), and the IVCTT height decreased by 1.5 cm (26%). A higher proportion of patients in the ICI-TKI group experienced tumor shrinkage than those in the ICI-ICI group (primary tumor, p = 0.0325; IVCTT, p = 0.0112). Approximately 27% of patients experienced an increase in the IVCTT height with ICI-ICI combination therapy. No significant difference was observed in the relative tumor shrinkage of IVCTT, primary or level-down staging of IVCTT, other treatment effects, incidence of TRAEs, surgical outcomes, or prognosis between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICI-based combination therapy is effective against IVCTT and primary RCC. Although ICI-ICI is associated with a higher probability of tumor growth compared with ICI-TKI in the frequency of tumor regression, both therapies may be almost equally effective against primary RCC with IVCTT.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1538-1547"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02598-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whether immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus ICI combination therapy or ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combination therapy is useful for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava tumor thrombosis (IVCTT) remains unclear.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the therapeutic effects and incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) associated with ICI-based combination therapy in 36 patients with advanced RCC with IVCTT.

Results: The median age at initiation of treatment was 71 years; the IVCTT stages were cT3b in 22 patients and cT3c in 14. The ICI-ICI and ICI-TKI groups comprised 15 and 21 patients, respectively. Median tumor shrinkage at the best response showed that the primary tumor diameter decreased by 1.8 cm (22%), and the IVCTT height decreased by 1.5 cm (26%). A higher proportion of patients in the ICI-TKI group experienced tumor shrinkage than those in the ICI-ICI group (primary tumor, p = 0.0325; IVCTT, p = 0.0112). Approximately 27% of patients experienced an increase in the IVCTT height with ICI-ICI combination therapy. No significant difference was observed in the relative tumor shrinkage of IVCTT, primary or level-down staging of IVCTT, other treatment effects, incidence of TRAEs, surgical outcomes, or prognosis between the groups.

Conclusion: ICI-based combination therapy is effective against IVCTT and primary RCC. Although ICI-ICI is associated with a higher probability of tumor growth compared with ICI-TKI in the frequency of tumor regression, both therapies may be almost equally effective against primary RCC with IVCTT.

Abstract Image

双免疫检查点抑制剂联合疗法与免疫检查点抑制剂加酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合疗法治疗伴有下腔静脉肿瘤血栓形成的肾细胞癌的比较分析。
背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)加ICI联合疗法或ICI加酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)联合疗法对伴有下腔静脉肿瘤血栓形成(IVCTT)的肾细胞癌(RCC)是否有用仍不清楚:我们回顾性评估了36例伴有IVCTT的晚期RCC患者接受基于ICI的联合疗法的治疗效果以及治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)的发生率:开始治疗时的中位年龄为71岁;22名患者的IVCTT分期为cT3b,14名患者的IVCTT分期为cT3c。ICI-ICI组和ICI-TKI组分别有15名和21名患者。最佳反应时肿瘤缩小的中位数显示,原发肿瘤直径缩小了1.8厘米(22%),IVCTT高度缩小了1.5厘米(26%)。与 ICI-ICI 组相比,ICI-TKI 组中肿瘤缩小的患者比例更高(原发肿瘤,p = 0.0325;IVCTT,p = 0.0112)。约有 27% 的患者在接受 ICI-ICI 联合治疗后 IVCTT 增高。两组患者在IVCTT肿瘤相对缩小、IVCTT原发分期或降级分期、其他治疗效果、TRAEs发生率、手术效果或预后方面均无明显差异:结论:基于 ICI 的联合疗法对 IVCTT 和原发性 RCC 有效。结论:基于 ICI 的联合疗法对 IVCTT 和原发性 RCC 均有效。虽然 ICI-ICI 与 ICI-TKI 相比,在肿瘤消退的频率上,ICI-TKI 的肿瘤生长概率更高,但这两种疗法对 IVCTT 的原发性 RCC 几乎同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信