Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Treating Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Children: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Xin Yu, Wengen Zhu, Chen Liu, Renrong Lu
{"title":"Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Treating Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Children: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Xin Yu, Wengen Zhu, Chen Liu, Renrong Lu","doi":"10.1177/10760296241271386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children presents unique challenges due to the limitations of standard anticoagulation therapies. Herein, we aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in pediatric patients with acute VTE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and Embase databases were searched for RCTs comparing DOACs to standard anticoagulation in pediatric VTE patients. Efficacy outcomes included VTE recurrence and all-cause mortality, while safety outcomes comprised major bleeding and other adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three RCTs with 790 participants were included. When compared with standard anticoagulation, DOACs demonstrated a reduced risk of VTE recurrence (risk difference[RD] = -3%, 95% confidence interval[CI]: -6% to 0%, P = 0.04) and an increased risk of any adverse event (RD = 8%, 95% CI: 1% to 14%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found in all-cause mortality, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, or total bleeding between the DOAC and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOACs, primarily dabigatran and rivaroxaban, are non-inferior to standard anticoagulants in reducing VTE recurrence in pediatric patients, with comparable safety profiles. Further research is essential to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11307352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241271386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children presents unique challenges due to the limitations of standard anticoagulation therapies. Herein, we aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in pediatric patients with acute VTE.

Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for RCTs comparing DOACs to standard anticoagulation in pediatric VTE patients. Efficacy outcomes included VTE recurrence and all-cause mortality, while safety outcomes comprised major bleeding and other adverse events.

Results: Three RCTs with 790 participants were included. When compared with standard anticoagulation, DOACs demonstrated a reduced risk of VTE recurrence (risk difference[RD] = -3%, 95% confidence interval[CI]: -6% to 0%, P = 0.04) and an increased risk of any adverse event (RD = 8%, 95% CI: 1% to 14%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found in all-cause mortality, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, or total bleeding between the DOAC and control groups.

Conclusion: DOACs, primarily dabigatran and rivaroxaban, are non-inferior to standard anticoagulants in reducing VTE recurrence in pediatric patients, with comparable safety profiles. Further research is essential to confirm these findings.

治疗儿童急性静脉血栓栓塞的直接口服抗凝剂:随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。
背景:由于标准抗凝疗法的局限性,儿童急性静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)面临着独特的挑战。在此,我们旨在系统回顾评估直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)对急性 VTE 儿童患者的疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(RCTs):方法: 在PubMed和Embase数据库中检索了对儿科VTE患者进行DOAC与标准抗凝治疗比较的RCT。疗效结果包括 VTE 复发率和全因死亡率,安全性结果包括大出血和其他不良事件:结果:共纳入了三项 RCT,790 名参与者。与标准抗凝相比,DOACs 可降低 VTE 复发风险(风险差异[RD] = -3%,95% 置信区间[CI]:-6% 至 0%,P = 0.04),增加任何不良事件的风险(风险差异[RD] = 8%,95% 置信区间[CI]:1% 至 14%,P = 0.02)。在全因死亡率、大出血、临床相关的非大出血或总出血量方面,DOAC组与对照组之间没有发现明显差异:结论:DOAC(主要是达比加群和利伐沙班)在减少儿科患者 VTE 复发方面的效果不优于标准抗凝药物,而且安全性相当。进一步的研究对证实这些发现至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信