Disparities in outpatient rural cholecystectomy outcomes

Abstract

Background

Previous studies showed comparable outcomes for common in-patient general surgery operations, but it is unknown if this extends to outpatient operations. Our aim was to compare outpatient cholecystectomy outcomes between rural and urban hospitals.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was done using the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample for patients 20-years-and-older undergoing cholecystectomy between 2016 and 2018 ​at rural and urban hospitals. Survey-weighted multivariable regression analysis was performed with primary outcomes including use-of-laparoscopy, complications, and patient discharge disposition.

Results

The most common indication for operation was cholecystitis in both hospital settings. On multivariable analysis, rural hospitals were associated with higher transfers to short-term hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.40, 95%CI 1.61-3.58, p ​< ​0.01) and complications (aOR 1.39, 95%CI 1.11-1.75, p ​< ​0.01). No difference was detected with laparoscopy (aOR 1.93, 95%CI 0.73-5.13, p ​= ​0.19), routine discharge (aOR 1.50, 95%C I0.91-2.45, p ​= ​0.11), or mortality (aOR 3.23, 95%CI 0.10–100.0, p ​= ​0.51).

Conclusions

Patients cared for at rural hospitals were more likely to be transferred to short-term hospitals and have higher complications. No differences were detected in laparoscopy, routine discharge or mortality.