Prospective development and validation of a universal classification for paediatric videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation: the PeDiAC score.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI:10.1111/anae.16394
Thorsten Dohrmann, Nelly Gutsche, Rilana Kramer, Eva M Zeidler, Katharina Röher, Viktor A Wünsch, André Dankert, Linda Krause, Christian Zöllner, Phillip B Sasu, Martin Petzoldt
{"title":"Prospective development and validation of a universal classification for paediatric videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation: the PeDiAC score.","authors":"Thorsten Dohrmann, Nelly Gutsche, Rilana Kramer, Eva M Zeidler, Katharina Röher, Viktor A Wünsch, André Dankert, Linda Krause, Christian Zöllner, Phillip B Sasu, Martin Petzoldt","doi":"10.1111/anae.16394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The VIDIAC score, a prospectively developed universal classification for videolaryngoscopy, has shown excellent diagnostic performance in adults. However, there is no reliable classification system for videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation in children. We aimed to develop and validate a multivariable logistic regression model and easy-to-use score to classify difficult videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation in children and to compare it with the Cormack and Lehane classification. A secondary aim was to externally validate the VIDIAC score in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study within a structured universal videolaryngoscopy implementation programme. We used C-MAC™ videolaryngoscopes in all children undergoing tracheal intubation for elective surgical procedures. We validated the VIDIAC score externally and assessed its performance. We then identified eligible co-variables for inclusion in the PeDiAC score, developed a multivariable logistic regression model and compared its performance against the Cormack and Lehane classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 809 children undergoing 904 episodes of tracheal intubation. The VIDIAC score outperformed the Cormack and Lehane classification when classifying the difficulty of videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95%CI 0.73-0.87) vs. 0.69 (95%CI 0.62-0.76), respectively, p = 0.018. Eight eligible tracheal intubation-related factors, that were selected by 100-times repeated 10-fold cross-validated least absolute shrinkage selector operator regression, were used to develop the PeDiAC model. The PeDiAC model and score showed excellent diagnostic performance and model calibration. The PeDiAC score achieved significantly better diagnostic performance than the Cormack and Lehane classification, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 (95%CI 0.96-0.99) vs. 0.69 (95%CI 0.62-0.76), respectively, p < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed and validated a specifically tailored classification for paediatric videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation with excellent diagnostic performance and calibration that outperformed the Cormack and Lehane classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16394","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The VIDIAC score, a prospectively developed universal classification for videolaryngoscopy, has shown excellent diagnostic performance in adults. However, there is no reliable classification system for videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation in children. We aimed to develop and validate a multivariable logistic regression model and easy-to-use score to classify difficult videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation in children and to compare it with the Cormack and Lehane classification. A secondary aim was to externally validate the VIDIAC score in children.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study within a structured universal videolaryngoscopy implementation programme. We used C-MAC™ videolaryngoscopes in all children undergoing tracheal intubation for elective surgical procedures. We validated the VIDIAC score externally and assessed its performance. We then identified eligible co-variables for inclusion in the PeDiAC score, developed a multivariable logistic regression model and compared its performance against the Cormack and Lehane classification.

Results: We studied 809 children undergoing 904 episodes of tracheal intubation. The VIDIAC score outperformed the Cormack and Lehane classification when classifying the difficulty of videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95%CI 0.73-0.87) vs. 0.69 (95%CI 0.62-0.76), respectively, p = 0.018. Eight eligible tracheal intubation-related factors, that were selected by 100-times repeated 10-fold cross-validated least absolute shrinkage selector operator regression, were used to develop the PeDiAC model. The PeDiAC model and score showed excellent diagnostic performance and model calibration. The PeDiAC score achieved significantly better diagnostic performance than the Cormack and Lehane classification, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 (95%CI 0.96-0.99) vs. 0.69 (95%CI 0.62-0.76), respectively, p < 0.001.

Conclusion: We developed and validated a specifically tailored classification for paediatric videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation with excellent diagnostic performance and calibration that outperformed the Cormack and Lehane classification.

儿科视频喉镜气管插管通用分类的前瞻性开发和验证:PeDiAC 评分。
背景:VIDIAC 评分是一种前瞻性开发的通用视频喉镜分级系统,在成人中显示出卓越的诊断性能。然而,目前还没有可靠的儿童视频喉镜气管插管分类系统。我们的目的是开发并验证一种多变量逻辑回归模型和易于使用的评分方法,用于对儿童视频喉镜气管插管困难进行分类,并与 Cormack 和 Lehane 的分类方法进行比较。第二个目的是在儿童中对 VIDIAC 评分进行外部验证:我们在一项结构化的通用视频喉镜实施计划中开展了一项前瞻性观察研究。我们使用 C-MAC™ 视频喉镜为所有接受气管插管的儿童进行择期手术治疗。我们从外部验证了 VIDIAC 评分,并对其性能进行了评估。然后,我们确定了可纳入 PeDiAC 评分的合格共变因素,建立了一个多变量逻辑回归模型,并将其性能与 Cormack 和 Lehane 分级进行了比较:我们对接受过 904 次气管插管的 809 名儿童进行了研究。在对视频喉镜气管插管的难度进行分类时,VIDIAC评分优于Cormack和Lehane分类,接收器操作特征曲线下面积分别为0.80(95%CI 0.73-0.87)和0.69(95%CI 0.62-0.76),P = 0.018。通过100次重复10倍交叉验证最小绝对缩减选择算子回归筛选出的8个符合条件的气管插管相关因素被用于建立PeDiAC模型。PeDiAC 模型和评分显示出卓越的诊断性能和模型校准性。PeDiAC 评分的诊断性能明显优于 Cormack 和 Lehane 分类,接收器操作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.97(95%CI 0.96-0.99)和 0.69(95%CI 0.62-0.76),P 结论:我们为儿科视频喉镜气管插管开发并验证了一种专门定制的分类方法,其诊断性能和校准效果均优于 Cormack 和 Lehane 分类方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信