Pearl: A Multi-Derivation Approach to Efficient CFL-Reachability Solving

IF 6.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Chenghang Shi;Haofeng Li;Yulei Sui;Jie Lu;Lian Li;Jingling Xue
{"title":"Pearl: A Multi-Derivation Approach to Efficient CFL-Reachability Solving","authors":"Chenghang Shi;Haofeng Li;Yulei Sui;Jie Lu;Lian Li;Jingling Xue","doi":"10.1109/TSE.2024.3437684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context-free language (CFL) reachability is a fundamental framework for formulating program analyses. CFL-reachability analysis works on top of an edge-labeled graph by deriving reachability relations and adding them as labeled edges to the graph. Existing CFL-reachability algorithms typically adopt a single-reachability relation derivation (SRD) strategy, i.e., one reachability relation is derived at a time. Unfortunately, this strategy can lead to redundancy, hindering the efficiency of the analysis. To address this problem, this paper proposes \n<small>Pearl</small>\n, a \n<i>multi-derivation</i>\n approach that reduces derivation redundancy for CFL-reachability solving, which significantly improves the efficiency of CFL-reachability analysis. Our key insight is that multiple edges can be simultaneously derived via batch propagation of reachability relations. We also tailor our multi-derivation approach to tackle transitive relations that frequently arise when solving CFL-reachability. Specifically, we present a highly efficient transitive-aware variant, \n<small>Pearl<sup>PG</sup></small>\n, which enhances \n<small>Pearl</small>\n with \n<i>propagation graphs</i>\n, a lightweight but effective graph representation, to further diminish redundant derivations. We evaluate the performance of our approach on two clients, i.e., context-sensitive value-flow analysis and field-sensitive alias analysis for C/C++. By eliminating a large amount of redundancy, our approach outperforms two baselines including the standard CFL-reachability algorithm and a state-of-the-art solver \n<small>Pocr</small>\n specialized for fast transitivity solving. In particular, the empirical results demonstrate that, for value-flow analysis and alias analysis respectively, \n<small>Pearl<sup>PG</sup></small>\n runs 3.09\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\times$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n faster on average (up to 4.44\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\times$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n) and 2.25\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\times$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n faster on average (up to 3.31\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\times$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n) than \n<small>Pocr</small>\n, while also consuming less memory.","PeriodicalId":13324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","volume":"50 9","pages":"2379-2397"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10623254/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context-free language (CFL) reachability is a fundamental framework for formulating program analyses. CFL-reachability analysis works on top of an edge-labeled graph by deriving reachability relations and adding them as labeled edges to the graph. Existing CFL-reachability algorithms typically adopt a single-reachability relation derivation (SRD) strategy, i.e., one reachability relation is derived at a time. Unfortunately, this strategy can lead to redundancy, hindering the efficiency of the analysis. To address this problem, this paper proposes Pearl , a multi-derivation approach that reduces derivation redundancy for CFL-reachability solving, which significantly improves the efficiency of CFL-reachability analysis. Our key insight is that multiple edges can be simultaneously derived via batch propagation of reachability relations. We also tailor our multi-derivation approach to tackle transitive relations that frequently arise when solving CFL-reachability. Specifically, we present a highly efficient transitive-aware variant, PearlPG , which enhances Pearl with propagation graphs , a lightweight but effective graph representation, to further diminish redundant derivations. We evaluate the performance of our approach on two clients, i.e., context-sensitive value-flow analysis and field-sensitive alias analysis for C/C++. By eliminating a large amount of redundancy, our approach outperforms two baselines including the standard CFL-reachability algorithm and a state-of-the-art solver Pocr specialized for fast transitivity solving. In particular, the empirical results demonstrate that, for value-flow analysis and alias analysis respectively, PearlPG runs 3.09 $\times$ faster on average (up to 4.44 $\times$ ) and 2.25 $\times$ faster on average (up to 3.31 $\times$ ) than Pocr , while also consuming less memory.
PEARL:高效 CFL 可及性求解的多重衍生方法
无上下文语言(CFL)可达性是制定程序分析的基本框架。CFL 可及性分析是在边标签图的基础上进行的,它推导出可及性关系,并将其作为标签边添加到图中。现有的 CFL 可及性算法通常采用单可及性关系推导(SRD)策略,即一次推导一个可及性关系。遗憾的是,这种策略会导致冗余,影响分析效率。为了解决这个问题,本文提出了一种多推导方法 Pearl,它可以减少 CFL可达性求解的推导冗余,从而显著提高 CFL可达性分析的效率。我们的主要见解是,通过可达性关系的批量传播,可以同时推导出多条边。我们还调整了多重推导方法,以解决 CFL 可及性求解中经常出现的传递关系问题。具体来说,我们提出了一种高效的传递感知变体 PearlPG,它通过传播图(一种轻量级但有效的图表示法)增强了 Pearl,从而进一步减少了冗余推导。我们在两个客户端上评估了我们方法的性能,即 C/C++ 的上下文敏感值流分析和字段敏感别名分析。通过消除大量冗余,我们的方法优于两种基线方法,包括标准 CFL 可及性算法和专门用于快速反式求解的最先进求解器 Pocr。经验结果特别表明,对于值流分析和别名分析,PearlPG 的平均运行速度比 Pocr 快 3.09 美元/次(最多 4.44 美元/次)和 2.25 美元/次(最多 3.31 美元/次),同时消耗的内存也更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.80%
发文量
724
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering seeks contributions comprising well-defined theoretical results and empirical studies with potential impacts on software construction, analysis, or management. The scope of this Transactions extends from fundamental mechanisms to the development of principles and their application in specific environments. Specific topic areas include: a) Development and maintenance methods and models: Techniques and principles for specifying, designing, and implementing software systems, encompassing notations and process models. b) Assessment methods: Software tests, validation, reliability models, test and diagnosis procedures, software redundancy, design for error control, and measurements and evaluation of process and product aspects. c) Software project management: Productivity factors, cost models, schedule and organizational issues, and standards. d) Tools and environments: Specific tools, integrated tool environments, associated architectures, databases, and parallel and distributed processing issues. e) System issues: Hardware-software trade-offs. f) State-of-the-art surveys: Syntheses and comprehensive reviews of the historical development within specific areas of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信