Multicenter Retrospective Review of Ketamine Use in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (Ketamine-PICU Study).

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/6626899
Christine M Groth, Christopher A Droege, Preeyaporn Sarangarm, Michaelia D Cucci, Kyle A Gustafson, Kathryn A Connor, Kimberly Kaukeinen, Nicole M Acquisto, Sai Ho J Chui, Deepali Dixit, Alexander H Flannery, Nina E Glass, Helen Horng, Mojdeh S Heavner, Justin Kinney, William J Peppard, Andrea Sikora, Brian L Erstad
{"title":"Multicenter Retrospective Review of Ketamine Use in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (Ketamine-PICU Study).","authors":"Christine M Groth, Christopher A Droege, Preeyaporn Sarangarm, Michaelia D Cucci, Kyle A Gustafson, Kathryn A Connor, Kimberly Kaukeinen, Nicole M Acquisto, Sai Ho J Chui, Deepali Dixit, Alexander H Flannery, Nina E Glass, Helen Horng, Mojdeh S Heavner, Justin Kinney, William J Peppard, Andrea Sikora, Brian L Erstad","doi":"10.1155/2024/6626899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe continuous infusion (CI) ketamine practices in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and evaluate its effect on pain/sedation scores, exposure to analgesics/sedatives, and adverse effects (AEs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter, retrospective, observational study in children <18 years who received CI ketamine between 2014 and 2017. Time spent in goal pain/sedation score range and daily cumulative doses of analgesics/sedatives were compared from the 24 hours (H) prior to CI ketamine to the first 24H and 25-48H of the CI. Adverse effects were collected over the first 7 days of CI ketamine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four patients from 4 PICUs were included; median (IQR) age 7 (1-13.25) years, 54% female (<i>n</i> = 13), 92% intubated (<i>n</i> = 22), 25% on CI vasopressors (<i>n</i> = 6), and 33% on CI paralytics (<i>n</i> = 8). Ketamine indications were analgesia/sedation (<i>n</i> = 21, 87.5%) and status epilepticus (<i>n</i> = 3, 12.5%). Median starting dose was 0.5 (0.48-0.70) mg/kg/hr and continued for a median of 2.4 (1.3-4.4) days. There was a significant difference in mean proportion of time spent within goal pain score range (24H prior: 74% ± 14%, 0-24H: 85% ± 10%, and 25-48H: 72% ± 20%; <i>p</i>=0.014). A significant reduction in median morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was seen (24H prior: 58 (8-195) mg vs. 0-24H: 4 (0-69) mg and <i>p</i>=0.01), but this was not sustained (25-48H: 24 (2-246) mg and <i>p</i>=0.29). Common AEs were tachycardia (63%), hypotension (54%), secretions/suctioning (29%), and emergence reactions (13%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ketamine CI improved time in goal pain score range and significantly reduced MME, but this was not sustained. Larger prospective studies are needed in the pediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":"2024 ","pages":"6626899"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6626899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Describe continuous infusion (CI) ketamine practices in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and evaluate its effect on pain/sedation scores, exposure to analgesics/sedatives, and adverse effects (AEs).

Methods: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study in children <18 years who received CI ketamine between 2014 and 2017. Time spent in goal pain/sedation score range and daily cumulative doses of analgesics/sedatives were compared from the 24 hours (H) prior to CI ketamine to the first 24H and 25-48H of the CI. Adverse effects were collected over the first 7 days of CI ketamine.

Results: Twenty-four patients from 4 PICUs were included; median (IQR) age 7 (1-13.25) years, 54% female (n = 13), 92% intubated (n = 22), 25% on CI vasopressors (n = 6), and 33% on CI paralytics (n = 8). Ketamine indications were analgesia/sedation (n = 21, 87.5%) and status epilepticus (n = 3, 12.5%). Median starting dose was 0.5 (0.48-0.70) mg/kg/hr and continued for a median of 2.4 (1.3-4.4) days. There was a significant difference in mean proportion of time spent within goal pain score range (24H prior: 74% ± 14%, 0-24H: 85% ± 10%, and 25-48H: 72% ± 20%; p=0.014). A significant reduction in median morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was seen (24H prior: 58 (8-195) mg vs. 0-24H: 4 (0-69) mg and p=0.01), but this was not sustained (25-48H: 24 (2-246) mg and p=0.29). Common AEs were tachycardia (63%), hypotension (54%), secretions/suctioning (29%), and emergence reactions (13%).

Conclusions: Ketamine CI improved time in goal pain score range and significantly reduced MME, but this was not sustained. Larger prospective studies are needed in the pediatric population.

儿科重症监护室使用氯胺酮的多中心回顾性研究(氯胺酮-重症监护室研究)。
目的描述在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中持续输注氯胺酮(CI)的做法,并评估其对疼痛/镇静评分、镇痛药/镇静剂暴露和不良反应(AEs)的影响:多中心、回顾性、儿童观察研究 结果:纳入了来自 4 个 PICU 的 24 名患者;中位数(IQR)年龄为 7(1-13.25)岁,54% 为女性(n = 13),92% 插管(n = 22),25% 使用 CI 血管加压剂(n = 6),33% 使用 CI 麻痹剂(n = 8)。氯胺酮的适应症为镇痛/镇静(21 人,87.5%)和癫痫状态(3 人,12.5%)。起始剂量中位数为 0.5 (0.48-0.70) mg/kg/hr,持续中位数为 2.4 (1.3-4.4) 天。在目标疼痛评分范围内度过的平均时间比例存在显著差异(24 小时前:74% ± 14%;0-24 小时:85% ± 10%;25-48 小时:72% ± 20%;P=0.014)。吗啡毫克当量(MME)中位数明显减少(24 小时前:58(8-195)毫克,0-24 小时:4(0-69)毫克,p=0.01),但这种减少并不持久(25-48 小时:24(2-246)毫克,p=0.29)。常见的AE为心动过速(63%)、低血压(54%)、分泌物/抽吸(29%)和出现反应(13%):氯胺酮 CI 可缩短疼痛评分在目标范围内的时间,并显著降低 MME,但这种效果并不持久。需要在儿科人群中开展更大规模的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信