The effect of longer epidural duration after open pancreaticoduodenectomy on pain and mobilisation: A retrospective single-centre analysis.

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
James Tankel, Shahaf Shay, Ariel Wimpfheimer, Michael Neumann, Robert Berko, Petachia Reissman, Menahem Ben Haim, Amir Dagan
{"title":"The effect of longer epidural duration after open pancreaticoduodenectomy on pain and mobilisation: A retrospective single-centre analysis.","authors":"James Tankel, Shahaf Shay, Ariel Wimpfheimer, Michael Neumann, Robert Berko, Petachia Reissman, Menahem Ben Haim, Amir Dagan","doi":"10.1177/17504589241265826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal length of epidural use following open pancreaticoduodenectomy has not been defined. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the length of patient-controlled epidural analgesia affected pain and ability to mobilise on epidural termination following open pancreaticoduodenectomy in the context of enhanced recovery after surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-centre cohort analysis was performed between November 2015 and December 2021 on patients who underwent open pancreaticoduodenectomy. As part of a continual review process of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, patient-controlled epidural analgesia duration changed allowing stratification of patients into either three- or five-day patient-controlled epidural analgesia groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 196 patients identified, 157 were included with 80 (50.9%) and 77 (49.1%) allocated to the three-day and five-day patient-controlled epidural analgesia groups, respectively. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia termination on postoperative day 3 was associated with transiently higher pain and less mobilisation, although no greater rescue analgesia requirement. Conversely, longer patient-controlled epidural analgesia usage following open pancreaticoduodenectomy was associated with less pain and greater mobilisation in the immediate postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Earlier patient-controlled epidural analgesia termination transiently leads to increased pain and decreased mobilisation following open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ensuring appropriate analgesia requirements or longer patient-controlled epidural analgesia usage should be considered to avoid patient discomfort and enhance recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241265826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal length of epidural use following open pancreaticoduodenectomy has not been defined. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the length of patient-controlled epidural analgesia affected pain and ability to mobilise on epidural termination following open pancreaticoduodenectomy in the context of enhanced recovery after surgery.

Methods: A retrospective single-centre cohort analysis was performed between November 2015 and December 2021 on patients who underwent open pancreaticoduodenectomy. As part of a continual review process of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, patient-controlled epidural analgesia duration changed allowing stratification of patients into either three- or five-day patient-controlled epidural analgesia groups.

Results: Of the 196 patients identified, 157 were included with 80 (50.9%) and 77 (49.1%) allocated to the three-day and five-day patient-controlled epidural analgesia groups, respectively. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia termination on postoperative day 3 was associated with transiently higher pain and less mobilisation, although no greater rescue analgesia requirement. Conversely, longer patient-controlled epidural analgesia usage following open pancreaticoduodenectomy was associated with less pain and greater mobilisation in the immediate postoperative period.

Conclusions: Earlier patient-controlled epidural analgesia termination transiently leads to increased pain and decreased mobilisation following open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ensuring appropriate analgesia requirements or longer patient-controlled epidural analgesia usage should be considered to avoid patient discomfort and enhance recovery.

开腹胰十二指肠切除术后延长硬膜外持续时间对疼痛和活动能力的影响:单中心回顾性分析。
背景:开腹胰十二指肠切除术后硬膜外使用的最佳时间尚未确定。本研究旨在探讨患者控制的硬膜外镇痛时间是否会影响开放式胰十二指肠切除术后硬膜外镇痛终止时的疼痛和活动能力,从而促进术后恢复:在 2015 年 11 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,对接受开腹胰十二指肠切除术的患者进行了回顾性单中心队列分析。作为术后增强恢复方案持续审查流程的一部分,患者自控硬膜外镇痛持续时间发生了变化,从而将患者分为患者自控硬膜外镇痛三天组或五天组:在确定的 196 名患者中,157 人被纳入其中,分别有 80 人(50.9%)和 77 人(49.1%)被分配到患者自控硬膜外镇痛三天组和五天组。在术后第 3 天终止患者自控硬膜外镇痛与短暂性疼痛加剧和活动减少有关,但不需要更多的镇痛抢救。相反,在开放式胰十二指肠切除术后使用患者自控硬膜外镇痛时间越长,术后疼痛越轻,活动能力越强:结论:开放式胰十二指肠切除术后较早终止患者自控硬膜外镇痛会短暂导致疼痛加剧和活动能力下降。应考虑确保适当的镇痛要求或延长患者自控硬膜外镇痛的使用时间,以避免患者不适并促进康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信