Changing the Culture to Improve CCF: An Improvement Project.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Joshua Kimbrell, Jacob Geldner, Dheuris Rodriguez, Dana Poke, Brittany Kalosza, Maria Rampersaud, Christian Dupree, Rick Allgood, Mike Taigman, John Vega
{"title":"Changing the Culture to Improve CCF: An Improvement Project.","authors":"Joshua Kimbrell, Jacob Geldner, Dheuris Rodriguez, Dana Poke, Brittany Kalosza, Maria Rampersaud, Christian Dupree, Rick Allgood, Mike Taigman, John Vega","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2388271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>After identifying chest compression fraction (CCF) as a key area for improvement, our Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agency aimed to improve our baseline monthly median CCF from 81.5% to 90% or more in paramedic-attended medical cardiac arrests by December 2023. The CCF is a process measure that, if improved, has been shown to increase likelihood of survival from cardiac arrest. Working as a hospital EMS agency within a large urban 9-1-1 system, our interventions focused on paramedics once they arrived on scene.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project used repeated Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles with brainstorming sessions, focus groups, and data review to achieve improvement. Interventions included standardized clinician feedback forms, increased follow-up for patients with ongoing resuscitation, a designated CPR team leader during resuscitations, and a pre-charged defibrillator prior to rhythm checks. These interventions were evaluated by tabulating weekly and monthly median CCF performance, seeking participant feedback, and reviewing control charts. These results were reported according to the Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our control chart analysis revealed special cause variation and an increase in average CCF to 89.0%. This improvement was achieved through successful implementation of process changes using PDSA cycles. Our most effective and popular intervention was our clinician feedback forms. Additionally, re-unifying patients and their successful resuscitation teams, participating in resuscitation academy events, and pre-charging the defibrillator to minimize CPR pauses collectively resulted in systemic improvement in resuscitation performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings illustrate that targeted education, increased clinician feedback, patient-team reunification, and high-performance resuscitation strategies produce measurable improvement in CCF.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2388271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: After identifying chest compression fraction (CCF) as a key area for improvement, our Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agency aimed to improve our baseline monthly median CCF from 81.5% to 90% or more in paramedic-attended medical cardiac arrests by December 2023. The CCF is a process measure that, if improved, has been shown to increase likelihood of survival from cardiac arrest. Working as a hospital EMS agency within a large urban 9-1-1 system, our interventions focused on paramedics once they arrived on scene.

Methods: This project used repeated Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles with brainstorming sessions, focus groups, and data review to achieve improvement. Interventions included standardized clinician feedback forms, increased follow-up for patients with ongoing resuscitation, a designated CPR team leader during resuscitations, and a pre-charged defibrillator prior to rhythm checks. These interventions were evaluated by tabulating weekly and monthly median CCF performance, seeking participant feedback, and reviewing control charts. These results were reported according to the Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0).

Results: Our control chart analysis revealed special cause variation and an increase in average CCF to 89.0%. This improvement was achieved through successful implementation of process changes using PDSA cycles. Our most effective and popular intervention was our clinician feedback forms. Additionally, re-unifying patients and their successful resuscitation teams, participating in resuscitation academy events, and pre-charging the defibrillator to minimize CPR pauses collectively resulted in systemic improvement in resuscitation performance.

Conclusions: The findings illustrate that targeted education, increased clinician feedback, patient-team reunification, and high-performance resuscitation strategies produce measurable improvement in CCF.

改变文化以改进基督教儿童基金:改进项目。
目标:在确定胸外按压分数 (CCF) 是一个需要改进的关键领域后,我们的紧急医疗服务 (EMS) 机构的目标是在 2023 年 12 月之前,将辅助医务人员处理的医疗心脏骤停案例中 CCF 的每月基线中位数从 81.5% 提高到 90% 或更高。CCF 是一项流程测量指标,如果得到改善,则可提高心脏骤停患者的存活率。作为大型城市 9-1-1 系统中的医院急救服务机构,我们的干预措施主要针对到达现场的急救人员:方法: 该项目采用反复的 "计划-实施-研究-行动"(PDSA)循环,通过头脑风暴会议、焦点小组和数据审查来实现改进。干预措施:干预措施包括标准化的临床医生反馈表、加强对正在进行复苏的患者的随访、在复苏过程中指定心肺复苏小组组长以及在心律检查前预充除颤器。通过统计每周和每月的 CCF 性能中位数、征求参与者的反馈意见以及查看控制图,对这些干预措施进行了评估。这些结果按照《卓越质量改进报告修订标准》(SQUIRE 2.0)进行报告:结果:我们的控制图分析表明了特殊原因造成的差异,并将平均 CCF 提高到了 89.0%。这一改进是通过使用 PDSA 循环成功实施流程变革实现的。我们最有效、最受欢迎的干预措施是临床医生反馈表。此外,重新组合患者及其成功的复苏团队、参加复苏学院活动以及预先为除颤器充电以尽量减少心肺复苏暂停等措施共同促成了复苏绩效的系统性改善:结论:研究结果表明,有针对性的教育、临床医生反馈的增加、患者-团队的重新组合以及高效的复苏策略可显著改善CCF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信