Assessment of hepatic transporter function in rats using dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MRI: a reproducibility study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ebony R Gunwhy, Catherine D G Hines, Claudia Green, Iina Laitinen, Sirisha Tadimalla, Paul D Hockings, Gunnar Schütz, J Gerry Kenna, Steven Sourbron, John C Waterton
{"title":"Assessment of hepatic transporter function in rats using dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MRI: a reproducibility study.","authors":"Ebony R Gunwhy, Catherine D G Hines, Claudia Green, Iina Laitinen, Sirisha Tadimalla, Paul D Hockings, Gunnar Schütz, J Gerry Kenna, Steven Sourbron, John C Waterton","doi":"10.1007/s10334-024-01192-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous studies have revealed a substantial between-centre variability in DCE-MRI biomarkers of hepatocellular function in rats. This study aims to identify the main sources of variability by comparing data measured at different centres and field strengths, at different days in the same subjects, and over the course of several months in the same centre.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>13 substudies were conducted across three facilities on two 4.7 T and two 7 T scanners using a 3D spoiled gradient echo acquisition. All substudies included 3-6 male Wistar-Han rats each, either scanned once with vehicle (n = 76) or twice with either vehicle (n = 19) or 10 mg/kg of rifampicin (n = 13) at follow-up. Absolute values, between-centre reproducibility, within-subject repeatability, detection limits, and effect sizes were derived for hepatocellular uptake rate (K<sup>trans</sup>) and biliary excretion rate (k<sub>bh</sub>). Sources of variability were identified using analysis of variance and stratification by centre, field strength, and time period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data showed significant differences between substudies of 31% for K<sup>trans</sup> (p = 0.013) and 43% for k<sub>bh</sub> (p < 0.001). Within-subject differences were substantially smaller for k<sub>bh</sub> (8%) but less so for K<sup>trans</sup> (25%). Rifampicin-induced inhibition was safely above the detection limits, with an effect size of 75 ± 3% in K<sup>trans</sup> and 67 ± 8% in k<sub>bh</sub>. Most of the variability in individual data was accounted for by between-subject (K<sup>trans</sup> = 23.5%; k<sub>bh</sub> = 42.5%) and between-centre (K<sup>trans</sup> = 44.9%; k<sub>bh</sub> = 50.9%) variability, substantially more than the between-day variation (K<sup>trans</sup> = 0.1%; k<sub>bh</sub> = 5.6%). Significant differences in k<sub>bh</sub> were found between field strengths at the same centre, between centres at the same field strength, and between repeat experiments over 2 months apart in the same centre.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Between-centre bias caused by factors such as hardware differences, subject preparations, and operator dependence is the main source of variability in DCE-MRI of liver function in rats, closely followed by biological between-subject differences. Future method development should focus on reducing these sources of error to minimise the sample sizes needed to detect more subtle levels of inhibition.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"697-708"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-024-01192-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies have revealed a substantial between-centre variability in DCE-MRI biomarkers of hepatocellular function in rats. This study aims to identify the main sources of variability by comparing data measured at different centres and field strengths, at different days in the same subjects, and over the course of several months in the same centre.

Materials and methods: 13 substudies were conducted across three facilities on two 4.7 T and two 7 T scanners using a 3D spoiled gradient echo acquisition. All substudies included 3-6 male Wistar-Han rats each, either scanned once with vehicle (n = 76) or twice with either vehicle (n = 19) or 10 mg/kg of rifampicin (n = 13) at follow-up. Absolute values, between-centre reproducibility, within-subject repeatability, detection limits, and effect sizes were derived for hepatocellular uptake rate (Ktrans) and biliary excretion rate (kbh). Sources of variability were identified using analysis of variance and stratification by centre, field strength, and time period.

Results: Data showed significant differences between substudies of 31% for Ktrans (p = 0.013) and 43% for kbh (p < 0.001). Within-subject differences were substantially smaller for kbh (8%) but less so for Ktrans (25%). Rifampicin-induced inhibition was safely above the detection limits, with an effect size of 75 ± 3% in Ktrans and 67 ± 8% in kbh. Most of the variability in individual data was accounted for by between-subject (Ktrans = 23.5%; kbh = 42.5%) and between-centre (Ktrans = 44.9%; kbh = 50.9%) variability, substantially more than the between-day variation (Ktrans = 0.1%; kbh = 5.6%). Significant differences in kbh were found between field strengths at the same centre, between centres at the same field strength, and between repeat experiments over 2 months apart in the same centre.

Discussion: Between-centre bias caused by factors such as hardware differences, subject preparations, and operator dependence is the main source of variability in DCE-MRI of liver function in rats, closely followed by biological between-subject differences. Future method development should focus on reducing these sources of error to minimise the sample sizes needed to detect more subtle levels of inhibition.

Abstract Image

利用动态钆喷酸增强核磁共振成像评估大鼠肝脏转运体功能:一项重现性研究。
目的:以往的研究表明,大鼠肝细胞功能的 DCE-MRI 生物标记物在不同中心之间存在很大差异。本研究旨在通过比较同一受试者在不同中心、不同场强、不同日期以及在同一中心几个月的测量数据,找出变异性的主要来源。材料与方法:在三家机构的两台 4.7 T 和两台 7 T 扫描仪上使用三维破坏梯度回波采集技术进行了 13 项子研究。所有子研究均包括 3-6 只雄性 Wistar-Han 大鼠,随访时使用载体扫描一次(76 只)或使用载体(19 只)或 10 毫克/千克利福平(13 只)扫描两次。得出了肝细胞摄取率(Ktrans)和胆汁排泄率(kbh)的绝对值、中心间可重复性、受试者内可重复性、检测限和效应大小。通过方差分析以及按中心、场强和时间段进行分层,确定了变异的来源:数据显示,不同子研究之间的 Ktrans 和 kbh 差异很大,分别为 31% (p = 0.013) 和 43% (p bh (8%),但 Ktrans 的差异较小 (25%)。利福平诱导的抑制作用安全地高于检测限,对 Ktrans 的影响大小为 75 ± 3%,对 kbh 的影响大小为 67 ± 8%。个体数据的大部分变异是由受试者之间(Ktrans = 23.5%;kbh = 42.5%)和中心之间(Ktrans = 44.9%;kbh = 50.9%)的变异造成的,大大超过了日间变异(Ktrans = 0.1%;kbh = 5.6%)。在同一中心的不同场强之间、同一场强的不同中心之间以及同一中心相隔 2 个月的重复实验之间,kbh 都存在显著差异:讨论:由硬件差异、受试者准备和操作者依赖性等因素造成的中心间偏差是大鼠肝功能 DCE-MRI 变异的主要来源,其次是受试者之间的生物学差异。未来的方法开发应侧重于减少这些误差来源,以尽量减少检测更微妙抑制水平所需的样本量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include: advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology, new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine, study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance, reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信