Comparison of the Impacts of Different Middle Ear Mucosal Conditions on Type I Tympanoplasty Outcomes.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Yu Han, Runqin Yang, Xiaobo Mao, Rui Li, Yongli Song, Hui Shi, Yani Feng, Xiaogang An, Dingjun Zha, Yang Chen
{"title":"Comparison of the Impacts of Different Middle Ear Mucosal Conditions on Type I Tympanoplasty Outcomes.","authors":"Yu Han, Runqin Yang, Xiaobo Mao, Rui Li, Yongli Song, Hui Shi, Yani Feng, Xiaogang An, Dingjun Zha, Yang Chen","doi":"10.1177/19160216241267724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to explore the impacts of different middle-ear mucosal conditions on the outcomes of type I tympanoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 164 patients with chronic otitis media was carried out. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to their mucosal condition. Preoperative hearing levels and air-bone gap (ABG) before and after surgery were compared via the Kruskal‒Wallis <i>H</i> test. The chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used to assess the postoperative complications and impact factors of functional success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively, neither the air conduction nor bone conduction values differed significantly among groups with different mucosal conditions. All of the ABG closed dramatically after type I tympanoplasty (<i>P</i> < .05) regardless of the mucosal conditions. The functional success rates were lower when the intratympanic mucosa was moderately or severely edematous compared with mildly edematous or normal (<i>P</i> < .05). The disease course, perforation site, and perforation size, as well as the status of the opposite ear, were not related to the auditory functional outcome. The differences in postoperative reotorrhea and reperforation among the 4 groups were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative hearing levels were not affected by middle-ear mucosal conditions. The functional success rate was influenced by mucosal conditions, but hearing levels were significantly enhanced after surgical intervention regardless of the mucosal status. Postoperative complications were not related to the mucosal conditions. Thus, type I tympanoplasty is adoptable for mucosal abnormalities when pharmacotherapy cannot result in a healthy tympanum.</p>","PeriodicalId":16615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","volume":"53 ","pages":"19160216241267724"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11304482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216241267724","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore the impacts of different middle-ear mucosal conditions on the outcomes of type I tympanoplasty.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 164 patients with chronic otitis media was carried out. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to their mucosal condition. Preoperative hearing levels and air-bone gap (ABG) before and after surgery were compared via the Kruskal‒Wallis H test. The chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used to assess the postoperative complications and impact factors of functional success.

Results: Preoperatively, neither the air conduction nor bone conduction values differed significantly among groups with different mucosal conditions. All of the ABG closed dramatically after type I tympanoplasty (P < .05) regardless of the mucosal conditions. The functional success rates were lower when the intratympanic mucosa was moderately or severely edematous compared with mildly edematous or normal (P < .05). The disease course, perforation site, and perforation size, as well as the status of the opposite ear, were not related to the auditory functional outcome. The differences in postoperative reotorrhea and reperforation among the 4 groups were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Preoperative hearing levels were not affected by middle-ear mucosal conditions. The functional success rate was influenced by mucosal conditions, but hearing levels were significantly enhanced after surgical intervention regardless of the mucosal status. Postoperative complications were not related to the mucosal conditions. Thus, type I tympanoplasty is adoptable for mucosal abnormalities when pharmacotherapy cannot result in a healthy tympanum.

比较不同中耳粘膜状况对 I 型鼓室成形术效果的影响。
背景:本研究旨在探讨不同的中耳粘膜状况对I型鼓室成形术效果的影响:本研究旨在探讨不同的中耳粘膜状况对 I 型鼓室成形术效果的影响:方法:对164名慢性中耳炎患者进行了回顾性分析。根据患者的粘膜情况将其分为 4 组。通过 Kruskal-Wallis H 检验比较手术前后的术前听力水平和气骨间隙(ABG)。采用卡方检验(chi-squared test)和费雪精确检验(Fisher's exact test)评估术后并发症和功能成功的影响因素:结果:术前,不同粘膜条件组的气导值和骨导值均无明显差异。在 I 型鼓室成形术后,所有 ABG 都明显闭合(P P 结论:术前听力水平不受粘膜条件的影响:术前听力水平不受中耳粘膜状况的影响。功能成功率受粘膜状况的影响,但无论粘膜状况如何,手术干预后听力水平都有显著提高。术后并发症与粘膜状况无关。因此,当药物治疗无法使鼓膜恢复健康时,I型鼓室成形术可用于治疗粘膜异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing on all aspects and sub-specialties of otolaryngology-head & neck surgery, including pediatric and geriatric otolaryngology, rhinology & anterior skull base surgery, otology/neurotology, facial plastic & reconstructive surgery, head & neck oncology, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, as well as a broad range of related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信