Perception of pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in glioma patients receiving concurrent temozolomide and radiation- a patient and physician survey.
IF 4.3 3区 材料科学Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Ana-Alicia Beltran-Bless, Bader Alshamsan, Jason Jia, Victor Lo, Seth Climans, Garth Nicholas, Terry L Ng
{"title":"Perception of pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis in glioma patients receiving concurrent temozolomide and radiation- a patient and physician survey.","authors":"Ana-Alicia Beltran-Bless, Bader Alshamsan, Jason Jia, Victor Lo, Seth Climans, Garth Nicholas, Terry L Ng","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04764-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis is required by provincial and national drug monographs during glioma treatment using temozolomide (TMZ) concurrently with radiation (TMZ-RT). However, real-world data suggest the potential benefits of PJP prophylaxis may not outweigh its potential harms in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center patient survey and a national physician survey to explore the role of PJP prophylaxis amongst glioma patients undergoing TMZ-RT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>23% (31/133) of physicians and 60% (44/73) of patients completed a survey. The median patient age was 42 (range 20-77); 85% (34/40) had completed adjuvant TMZ. Although only 2.4% (1/41) of patients received PJP prophylaxis, only one person (without PJP prophylaxis) was hospitalized for pneumonia. When presented with hypothetical PJP risks, 13.2% (5/38) of patients were concerned about PJP infection, while 26% (10/38) were concerned about potential side effects from prophylactic antibiotics. Most physicians (77%, 17/22) perceived the evidence for PJP prophylaxis as weak; 58% (11/19) did not routinely prescribe prophylaxis, and 73% (16/22) felt that PJP prophylaxis should be limited to patients with additional risk factors. Over 95% of physicians estimated that the incidence of PJP was < 1% in their last 5 years of practice regardless of PJP prophylaxis. For 73% (16/22) of physicians, to prescribe PJP prophylaxis, the risk of PJP infection needed to be 3-8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current recommendation to routinely prescribe PJP prophylaxis in patients receiving TMZ-RT in the absence of other risk factors warrants reconsideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04764-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis is required by provincial and national drug monographs during glioma treatment using temozolomide (TMZ) concurrently with radiation (TMZ-RT). However, real-world data suggest the potential benefits of PJP prophylaxis may not outweigh its potential harms in this population.
Methods: We conducted a single-center patient survey and a national physician survey to explore the role of PJP prophylaxis amongst glioma patients undergoing TMZ-RT.
Results: 23% (31/133) of physicians and 60% (44/73) of patients completed a survey. The median patient age was 42 (range 20-77); 85% (34/40) had completed adjuvant TMZ. Although only 2.4% (1/41) of patients received PJP prophylaxis, only one person (without PJP prophylaxis) was hospitalized for pneumonia. When presented with hypothetical PJP risks, 13.2% (5/38) of patients were concerned about PJP infection, while 26% (10/38) were concerned about potential side effects from prophylactic antibiotics. Most physicians (77%, 17/22) perceived the evidence for PJP prophylaxis as weak; 58% (11/19) did not routinely prescribe prophylaxis, and 73% (16/22) felt that PJP prophylaxis should be limited to patients with additional risk factors. Over 95% of physicians estimated that the incidence of PJP was < 1% in their last 5 years of practice regardless of PJP prophylaxis. For 73% (16/22) of physicians, to prescribe PJP prophylaxis, the risk of PJP infection needed to be 3-8%.
Conclusion: The current recommendation to routinely prescribe PJP prophylaxis in patients receiving TMZ-RT in the absence of other risk factors warrants reconsideration.