Molecular Differences With Therapeutic Implications in Early-Onset Compared With Average-Onset Biliary Tract Cancers.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Thejus Jayakrishnan, Yasmine Baca, Joanne Xiu, Mehrie Patel, Benjamin A Weinberg, Emil Lou, Jashodeep Datta, Moh'd Khushman, Pat Gulhati, Sanjay Goel, Tiago Biachi de Castria, Vaia Florou, Kanika G Nair, Suneel D Kamath, Alok A Khorana
{"title":"Molecular Differences With Therapeutic Implications in Early-Onset Compared With Average-Onset Biliary Tract Cancers.","authors":"Thejus Jayakrishnan, Yasmine Baca, Joanne Xiu, Mehrie Patel, Benjamin A Weinberg, Emil Lou, Jashodeep Datta, Moh'd Khushman, Pat Gulhati, Sanjay Goel, Tiago Biachi de Castria, Vaia Florou, Kanika G Nair, Suneel D Kamath, Alok A Khorana","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Early-onset biliary tract cancer (eoBTC) is among the fast-growing subset of early-onset cancers, yet little is known about its biology. We sought to identify novel molecular characteristics of eoBTC in relation to average-onset BTC (aoBTC) using a real-world multiomics data set.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study comprised patients with BTC whose tumors underwent molecular analyses at Caris Life Sciences and were categorized by age (<50 years for eoBTC, ≥50 years for aoBTC). <i>P</i> values were adjusted for multiple testing and considered significant at <i>Q</i> < 0.05 (molecular comparisons) or <i>Q</i> < 0.25 (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis [GSEA]). Insurance claims data were used for survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 5,587 patients with BTC (453 eoBTC, median age = 44 years and 5,134 aoBTC, median age = 68 years). <i>FGFR2</i> fusion (15.7% in eoBTC <i>v</i> 5.9% in aoBTC) and <i>NIPBL</i> fusion (1.1% <i>v</i> 0%) were significantly more prevalent in eoBTC (both <i>Q</i> < 0.001). The interferon gamma-IFG score (fold change [FC], 1.1; <i>Q</i> = 0.01) and T-cell inflammation score (FC, 17.3; <i>Q</i> = 0.03) were significantly higher in aoBTC. On GSEA, angiogenesis was enriched in eoBTC (normalized enrichment score [NES] = 1.51; <i>Q</i> = 0.16), whereas IFG (NES = -1.58; <i>Q</i> = 0.06) and inflammatory response (NES = -1.46; <i>Q</i> = 0.18) were enriched in aoBTC. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 (eoBTC) versus 13.3 months (aoBTC), hazard ratio = 0.86, <i>P</i> = .004. The median OS by FGFR2 fusion (with fusion <i>v</i> without) was 21.7 versus 15.0 months (<i>P</i> = .47) for eoBTC and 18.6 versus 12.2 months (<i>P</i> < .001) for aoBTC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified crucial differences including higher prevalence of <i>FGFR2</i> fusions in eoBTC and variations in immunotherapy-related markers. Better outcomes in eoBTC were affected by the <i>FGFR2</i> fusion status. Our findings underscore the need for ensuring access to next-generation sequencing testing, including prompt identification of actionable targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400138"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Early-onset biliary tract cancer (eoBTC) is among the fast-growing subset of early-onset cancers, yet little is known about its biology. We sought to identify novel molecular characteristics of eoBTC in relation to average-onset BTC (aoBTC) using a real-world multiomics data set.

Methods: The study comprised patients with BTC whose tumors underwent molecular analyses at Caris Life Sciences and were categorized by age (<50 years for eoBTC, ≥50 years for aoBTC). P values were adjusted for multiple testing and considered significant at Q < 0.05 (molecular comparisons) or Q < 0.25 (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis [GSEA]). Insurance claims data were used for survival analysis.

Results: The study included 5,587 patients with BTC (453 eoBTC, median age = 44 years and 5,134 aoBTC, median age = 68 years). FGFR2 fusion (15.7% in eoBTC v 5.9% in aoBTC) and NIPBL fusion (1.1% v 0%) were significantly more prevalent in eoBTC (both Q < 0.001). The interferon gamma-IFG score (fold change [FC], 1.1; Q = 0.01) and T-cell inflammation score (FC, 17.3; Q = 0.03) were significantly higher in aoBTC. On GSEA, angiogenesis was enriched in eoBTC (normalized enrichment score [NES] = 1.51; Q = 0.16), whereas IFG (NES = -1.58; Q = 0.06) and inflammatory response (NES = -1.46; Q = 0.18) were enriched in aoBTC. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 (eoBTC) versus 13.3 months (aoBTC), hazard ratio = 0.86, P = .004. The median OS by FGFR2 fusion (with fusion v without) was 21.7 versus 15.0 months (P = .47) for eoBTC and 18.6 versus 12.2 months (P < .001) for aoBTC.

Conclusion: We identified crucial differences including higher prevalence of FGFR2 fusions in eoBTC and variations in immunotherapy-related markers. Better outcomes in eoBTC were affected by the FGFR2 fusion status. Our findings underscore the need for ensuring access to next-generation sequencing testing, including prompt identification of actionable targets.

早发胆道癌与一般发病胆道癌的分子差异及其治疗意义
目的:早发胆道癌(eoBTC)是快速增长的早发癌亚群之一,但人们对其生物学特性知之甚少。我们试图利用真实世界的多组学数据集确定 eoBTC 与平均发病胆道癌(aoBTC)的新分子特征:研究对象包括BTC患者,他们的肿瘤在Caris生命科学公司进行了分子分析,并按年龄进行了分类(P值经多重检验调整,在Q<0.05(分子比较)或Q<0.25(基因组富集分析[GSEA])时具有显著性)。保险理赔数据用于生存分析:研究共纳入 5587 例 BTC 患者(453 例 eoBTC,中位年龄 = 44 岁;5134 例 aoBTC,中位年龄 = 68 岁)。表皮生长因子受体 2 融合(eoBTC 为 15.7%,aoBTC 为 5.9%)和 NIPBL 融合(eoBTC 为 1.1%,aoBTC 为 0%)在 eoBTC 中的发生率明显更高(两者的 Q 值均小于 0.001)。干扰素γ-IFG评分(折叠变化[FC],1.1;Q = 0.01)和T细胞炎症评分(FC,17.3;Q = 0.03)在aoBTC中明显更高。在 GSEA 中,血管生成在 eoBTC 中富集(归一化富集得分 [NES] = 1.51;Q = 0.16),而 IFG(NES = -1.58; Q = 0.06)和炎症反应(NES = -1.46; Q = 0.18)在 aoBTC 中富集。中位总生存期(OS)为16.5个月(eoBTC)对13.3个月(aoBTC),危险比=0.86,P=0.004。FGFR2融合(融合与未融合)的中位OS:eoBTC为21.7个月对15.0个月(P = .47),aoBTC为18.6个月对12.2个月(P < .001):我们发现了一些关键的差异,包括 eoBTC 中 FGFR2 融合的发生率更高,以及免疫疗法相关标志物的变化。FGFR2融合状态会影响eoBTC更好的预后。我们的研究结果强调了确保获得新一代测序检测的必要性,包括及时发现可采取行动的靶点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信