A red blood cell-based score in the prognostication of patients with metastatic RCC of the Meet-URO 15 study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Shobana Anpalakhan, Giuseppe Luigi Banna, Sara Elena Rebuzzi, Giuseppe Fornarini, Marco Maruzzo, Paolo Andrea Zucali, Fabio Catalano, Ludovica Antonj, Marianna Tudini, Lucia Fratino, Andrea Malgeri, Pasquale Rescigno, Alessio Signori, Alessandro Acunzo, Enrico Maria Silini, Giulia Mazzaschi, Sebastiano Buti
{"title":"A red blood cell-based score in the prognostication of patients with metastatic RCC of the Meet-URO 15 study.","authors":"Shobana Anpalakhan, Giuseppe Luigi Banna, Sara Elena Rebuzzi, Giuseppe Fornarini, Marco Maruzzo, Paolo Andrea Zucali, Fabio Catalano, Ludovica Antonj, Marianna Tudini, Lucia Fratino, Andrea Malgeri, Pasquale Rescigno, Alessio Signori, Alessandro Acunzo, Enrico Maria Silini, Giulia Mazzaschi, Sebastiano Buti","doi":"10.1080/1750743X.2024.2382666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims:</b> Anemia, mean corpuscular volume and red cell distribution width may have some effects on survival outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients and are incorporated in a red blood cell (RBC)-based score. Its validity in prognostication of mRCC patients treated with second-line nivolumab was assessed. <b>Patients and methods:</b> Retrospective analysis using Meet-URO-15 cohort of mRCC patients receiving nivolumab in the second-line setting or beyond. Outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). <b>Results:</b> A total of 390 patients were included. Significant differences in OS and PFS between RBC-based score groups, with group 1 (2 or 3 of the RBC-related prognostic factors) having longer OS (median 29.5 months, 95% CI: 23.1-35.9, versus 11.5 months, 95% CI: 8.5-22.6; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and PFS (7.5 months, 95% CI: 5.5-10.2, versus 4.2 months, 95% CI: 3.3-5.9; <i>p</i> = 0.040) than those in group 0 (0 or 1 RBC-related prognostic factors). Belonging to group 1 independently predicted OS (hazard ratio: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.50-0.85; <i>p</i> = 0.002) but not PFS (hazard ratio: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.70-1.14, <i>p</i> = 0.370) or disease response (OR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.41-1.10; <i>p</i> = 0.118) at multivariable analysis. <b>Conclusion:</b> RBC-based group scores independently predicted OS in mRCC patients treated with nivolumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":13328,"journal":{"name":"Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1750743X.2024.2382666","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Anemia, mean corpuscular volume and red cell distribution width may have some effects on survival outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients and are incorporated in a red blood cell (RBC)-based score. Its validity in prognostication of mRCC patients treated with second-line nivolumab was assessed. Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis using Meet-URO-15 cohort of mRCC patients receiving nivolumab in the second-line setting or beyond. Outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 390 patients were included. Significant differences in OS and PFS between RBC-based score groups, with group 1 (2 or 3 of the RBC-related prognostic factors) having longer OS (median 29.5 months, 95% CI: 23.1-35.9, versus 11.5 months, 95% CI: 8.5-22.6; p < 0.001) and PFS (7.5 months, 95% CI: 5.5-10.2, versus 4.2 months, 95% CI: 3.3-5.9; p = 0.040) than those in group 0 (0 or 1 RBC-related prognostic factors). Belonging to group 1 independently predicted OS (hazard ratio: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.50-0.85; p = 0.002) but not PFS (hazard ratio: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.70-1.14, p = 0.370) or disease response (OR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.41-1.10; p = 0.118) at multivariable analysis. Conclusion: RBC-based group scores independently predicted OS in mRCC patients treated with nivolumab.

Meet-URO 15 研究中基于红细胞的转移性 RCC 患者预后评分。
目的:贫血、平均血球容积和红细胞分布宽度可能会对转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者的生存预后产生一些影响,并被纳入了基于红细胞(RBC)的评分中。我们评估了其在接受二线nivolumab治疗的转移性肾细胞癌患者预后中的有效性。患者和方法使用 Meet-URO-15 队列对二线或二线以上接受尼妥珠单抗治疗的 mRCC 患者进行回顾性分析。结果为总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。研究结果共纳入390名患者。与0组(0或1个RBC相关预后因素)相比,1组(2或3个RBC相关预后因素)的OS(中位29.5个月,95% CI:23.1-35.9;11.5个月,95% CI:8.5-22.6;P P = 0.040)更长。在多变量分析中,属于第1组可独立预测OS(危险比:0.65,95% CI:0.50-0.85;P = 0.002),但不能预测PFS(危险比:0.89,95% CI:0.70-1.14,P = 0.370)或疾病反应(OR 0.68,95% CI:0.41-1.10;P = 0.118)。结论基于RBC的分组评分可独立预测接受尼伐单抗治疗的mRCC患者的OS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Immunotherapy
Immunotherapy 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Many aspects of the immune system and mechanisms of immunomodulatory therapies remain to be elucidated in order to exploit fully the emerging opportunities. Those involved in the research and clinical applications of immunotherapy are challenged by the huge and intricate volumes of knowledge arising from this fast-evolving field. The journal Immunotherapy offers the scientific community an interdisciplinary forum, providing them with information on the most recent advances of various aspects of immunotherapies, in a concise format to aid navigation of this complex field. Immunotherapy delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for this vitally important area of research. Unsolicited article proposals are welcomed and authors are required to comply fully with the journal''s Disclosure & Conflict of Interest Policy as well as major publishing guidelines, including ICMJE and GPP3.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信