{"title":"The utility and impact of digital endpoints for improving breast cancer outcomes.","authors":"Ismail Jatoi, Jonathan A L Gelfond","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2390056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In breast cancer clinical trials utilizing digital endpoints, wearable sensors record participants' health information during activities of daily living. These sensors are worn on the wrist or finger, placed as a skin patch or headband, or embedded on clothing. Data collected from wearable sensors form the basis of a digital endpoint, useful for determining effects of novel treatments on health outcomes, particularly quality-of-life outcomes.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>References for this article were selected from a PubMed search spanning from 1 January 2017,to 1 July 2024, using the terms 'wearable sensors,' 'digital endpoints,' 'virtualtrials,' 'breast cancer.' Additional articles from the authors' personal collection of papers and reviewers suggestions were also used.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Digital endpoints must be validated as proper surrogate measures for healthcare outcomes, prior to their use in breast cancer trials. Wearable sensors may introduce biases, such as 'missing not-at-random bias,' and perhaps even exacerbate disparities in healthcare outcomes if patients not comfortable with their use are excluded from clinical trials, or if the accuracy of sensors varies between racial and ethnic groups. Therefore, before embarking on trials with digital endpoints, validation studies are required, and limitations and risks of such trials need to be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2390056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In breast cancer clinical trials utilizing digital endpoints, wearable sensors record participants' health information during activities of daily living. These sensors are worn on the wrist or finger, placed as a skin patch or headband, or embedded on clothing. Data collected from wearable sensors form the basis of a digital endpoint, useful for determining effects of novel treatments on health outcomes, particularly quality-of-life outcomes.
Areas covered: References for this article were selected from a PubMed search spanning from 1 January 2017,to 1 July 2024, using the terms 'wearable sensors,' 'digital endpoints,' 'virtualtrials,' 'breast cancer.' Additional articles from the authors' personal collection of papers and reviewers suggestions were also used.
Expert opinion: Digital endpoints must be validated as proper surrogate measures for healthcare outcomes, prior to their use in breast cancer trials. Wearable sensors may introduce biases, such as 'missing not-at-random bias,' and perhaps even exacerbate disparities in healthcare outcomes if patients not comfortable with their use are excluded from clinical trials, or if the accuracy of sensors varies between racial and ethnic groups. Therefore, before embarking on trials with digital endpoints, validation studies are required, and limitations and risks of such trials need to be addressed.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.