The Role of Early Hemoadsorption in Severe COVID-19 Treatment: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Blood Purification Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1159/000540584
Karjbundid Surasit, Nattachai Srisawat
{"title":"The Role of Early Hemoadsorption in Severe COVID-19 Treatment: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Karjbundid Surasit, Nattachai Srisawat","doi":"10.1159/000540584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hemoadsorption, an extracorporeal apheresis technique, is reportedly used in severe COVID-19 patients. However, limited evidence from randomized clinical trials supports this practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center study, severe COVID-19 patients requiring ICU admission were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive HA-330 hemoadsorption in combination with standard treatment or standard therapy alone. Both groups received tocilizumab intravenously if their clinical conditions worsened within 24-48 h. The primary outcome was mortality from any cause within 28 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilator-free days, daily C-reactive protein levels, oxygenation (defined by PaO2/FiO2 ratio), daily sequential organ failure assessment score, and severity score of lung infiltration on chest X-rays (CXR RALE score).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 patients underwent randomization, with 14 (50%) receiving HA-330 hemoadsorption. Only 9 out of 14 patients (64.3%) in the control group experienced clinical worsening and were subsequently administered intravenous tocilizumab. At 28 days, the mortality rate was significantly lower in the intervention group (28.57% vs. 78.57%, p = 0.021), with a hazard ratio of death of 0.26 (95% CI = 0.08-0.81; p = 0.021). All of secondary outcomes were comparable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our pilot randomized trial, the early application of HA-330 hemoadsorption in patients with severe COVID-19 may establish a favorable outcome in term of mortality. These data provide the initial proof of concept for conducting a large-scale study in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":8953,"journal":{"name":"Blood Purification","volume":" ","pages":"793-803"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Purification","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hemoadsorption, an extracorporeal apheresis technique, is reportedly used in severe COVID-19 patients. However, limited evidence from randomized clinical trials supports this practice.

Methods: In this single-center study, severe COVID-19 patients requiring ICU admission were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive HA-330 hemoadsorption in combination with standard treatment or standard therapy alone. Both groups received tocilizumab intravenously if their clinical conditions worsened within 24-48 h. The primary outcome was mortality from any cause within 28 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilator-free days, daily C-reactive protein levels, oxygenation (defined by PaO2/FiO2 ratio), daily sequential organ failure assessment score, and severity score of lung infiltration on chest X-rays (CXR RALE score).

Results: A total of 28 patients underwent randomization, with 14 (50%) receiving HA-330 hemoadsorption. Only 9 out of 14 patients (64.3%) in the control group experienced clinical worsening and were subsequently administered intravenous tocilizumab. At 28 days, the mortality rate was significantly lower in the intervention group (28.57% vs. 78.57%, p = 0.021), with a hazard ratio of death of 0.26 (95% CI = 0.08-0.81; p = 0.021). All of secondary outcomes were comparable in both groups.

Conclusion: Based on our pilot randomized trial, the early application of HA-330 hemoadsorption in patients with severe COVID-19 may establish a favorable outcome in term of mortality. These data provide the initial proof of concept for conducting a large-scale study in the future.

早期吸血在严重 COVID-19 治疗中的作用:一项试点随机对照试验。
导言:据报道,COVID-19重症患者可采用体外无细胞吸附技术(Hemoadsorption)。然而,支持这种做法的随机临床试验证据有限:在这项单中心研究中,需要入住重症监护室的重症 COVID-19 患者被随机分配(1:1)接受 HA-330 血液吸附联合标准治疗或单独标准治疗。如果患者的临床状况在 24 到 48 小时内恶化,两组患者都将静脉注射托珠单抗。主要结果是随机分组后 28 天内任何原因导致的死亡率。次要结果包括无机械呼吸机天数、每日C反应蛋白水平、氧饱和度(以PaO2/FiO2比值定义)、每日序贯器官衰竭评估评分以及胸部X光片肺部浸润严重程度评分(CXR RALE评分):共有 28 名患者接受了随机治疗,其中 14 人(50%)接受了 HA- 330 血液吸附治疗。对照组的14名患者中只有9名(64.3%)临床症状恶化,随后接受了静脉注射托珠单抗。28 天后,干预组的死亡率明显降低(28.57% vs 78.57%,P=0.021),死亡危险比为 0.26(95%CI = 0.08 - 0.81;P=0.021)。两组的所有次要结果均具有可比性:结论:根据我们的试点随机试验,在重症 COVID-19 患者中早期应用 HA-330 吸血疗法可在死亡率方面获得良好的结果。这些数据为今后开展大规模研究提供了初步的概念验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Purification
Blood Purification 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical information on hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis and apheresis is featured in this journal. Recognizing the critical importance of equipment and procedures, particular emphasis has been placed on reports, drawn from a wide range of fields, describing technical advances and improvements in methodology. Papers reflect the search for cost-effective solutions which increase not only patient survival but also patient comfort and disease improvement through prevention or correction of undesirable effects. Advances in vascular access and blood anticoagulation, problems associated with exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and acute-care nephrology, including continuous therapies, also receive attention. Nephrologists, internists, intensivists and hospital staff involved in dialysis, apheresis and immunoadsorption for acute and chronic solid organ failure will find this journal useful and informative. ''Blood Purification'' also serves as a platform for multidisciplinary experiences involving nephrologists, cardiologists and critical care physicians in order to expand the level of interaction between different disciplines and specialities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信