Effect of Preoperative Anterolateral Ligament Injury on Outcomes After Isolated Acute ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Graft: A Prospective Study With Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1177/03635465241263599
Marcel Faraco Sobrado, Andre Giardino Moreira da Silva, Paulo Victor Partezani Helito, Camilo Partezani Helito
{"title":"Effect of Preoperative Anterolateral Ligament Injury on Outcomes After Isolated Acute ACL Reconstruction With Hamstring Graft: A Prospective Study With Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.","authors":"Marcel Faraco Sobrado, Andre Giardino Moreira da Silva, Paulo Victor Partezani Helito, Camilo Partezani Helito","doi":"10.1177/03635465241263599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential influence of a preoperative anterolateral ligament (ALL) lesion seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the mid- and long-term surgical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is still controversial.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical outcomes and failure rate of isolated ACL reconstruction at a minimum 5-year follow-up in patients with and without ALL injury diagnosed preoperatively using MRI.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of patients with acute ACL injury was divided into 2 groups based on the presence (ALL injury group) or absence (control group) of ALL injury on preoperative MRI. This is a longer-term follow-up study of a previously published study that had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Both groups underwent anatomic isolated reconstruction of the ACL. The Lysholm and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores, KT-1000 arthrometer and pivot-shift tests, reconstruction failure rate, incidence of contralateral ACL injury, presence of associated meniscal injury, and presence of knee hyperextension were evaluated. The evaluation at the 5-year follow-up was also compared with the same patient's evaluation at 2 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients were evaluated. No significant differences were found between the groups in the preoperative evaluation. In the postoperative evaluation, patients in the ALL injury group had a higher reconstruction failure rate (14.3% vs 4.6% for the control group; <i>P</i> = .049) and worse clinical outcomes according to the Lysholm scores (85.0 ± 10.3 vs 92.3 ± 6.6; <i>P</i> < .00001). Although the pivot-shift test results were similar, anteroposterior translation using the KT-1000 arthrometer revealed worse results for the ALL injury group (2.8 ± 1.4 mm vs 1.9 ± 1.3 mm; <i>P</i> = .00018). Patients in the ALL injury group also had an increase in KT-1000 arthrometer values from 2 to 5 years (2.4 ± 1.6 vs 2.8 ± 1.4; <i>P</i> = .038). Patients in the control group had no differences in outcomes from 2 to 5 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined ACL and ALL injuries were associated with significantly less favorable outcomes than were isolated ACL injuries at a minimum follow-up of 5 years after isolated ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Patients with concomitant ALL injury showed a higher failure rate and worse functional scores. Also, knee stability tended to slightly worsen from 2 to 5 years in cases of associated ALL injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241263599","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The potential influence of a preoperative anterolateral ligament (ALL) lesion seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the mid- and long-term surgical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is still controversial.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and failure rate of isolated ACL reconstruction at a minimum 5-year follow-up in patients with and without ALL injury diagnosed preoperatively using MRI.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: A prospective cohort of patients with acute ACL injury was divided into 2 groups based on the presence (ALL injury group) or absence (control group) of ALL injury on preoperative MRI. This is a longer-term follow-up study of a previously published study that had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Both groups underwent anatomic isolated reconstruction of the ACL. The Lysholm and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores, KT-1000 arthrometer and pivot-shift tests, reconstruction failure rate, incidence of contralateral ACL injury, presence of associated meniscal injury, and presence of knee hyperextension were evaluated. The evaluation at the 5-year follow-up was also compared with the same patient's evaluation at 2 years of follow-up.

Results: A total of 156 patients were evaluated. No significant differences were found between the groups in the preoperative evaluation. In the postoperative evaluation, patients in the ALL injury group had a higher reconstruction failure rate (14.3% vs 4.6% for the control group; P = .049) and worse clinical outcomes according to the Lysholm scores (85.0 ± 10.3 vs 92.3 ± 6.6; P < .00001). Although the pivot-shift test results were similar, anteroposterior translation using the KT-1000 arthrometer revealed worse results for the ALL injury group (2.8 ± 1.4 mm vs 1.9 ± 1.3 mm; P = .00018). Patients in the ALL injury group also had an increase in KT-1000 arthrometer values from 2 to 5 years (2.4 ± 1.6 vs 2.8 ± 1.4; P = .038). Patients in the control group had no differences in outcomes from 2 to 5 years of follow-up.

Conclusion: Combined ACL and ALL injuries were associated with significantly less favorable outcomes than were isolated ACL injuries at a minimum follow-up of 5 years after isolated ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Patients with concomitant ALL injury showed a higher failure rate and worse functional scores. Also, knee stability tended to slightly worsen from 2 to 5 years in cases of associated ALL injury.

术前前外侧韧带损伤对使用腘绳肌移植物进行孤立急性前交叉韧带重建术后效果的影响:一项至少随访 5 年的前瞻性研究。
背景:目的:评估术前通过磁共振成像(MRI)确诊为前外侧韧带(ALL)损伤和未确诊为ALL损伤的患者,在至少5年的随访中,孤立前交叉韧带重建术的临床疗效和失败率:研究设计:队列研究;证据级别:2:前瞻性队列研究:根据术前核磁共振成像显示存在(ALL损伤组)或不存在(对照组)ALL损伤,将急性前交叉韧带损伤患者分为两组。这是对之前发表的一项研究的长期随访研究,该研究的随访时间至少为两年。两组患者均接受了前交叉韧带解剖孤立重建术。研究评估了Lysholm和国际膝关节文献委员会的主观评分、KT-1000关节测量计和枢轴移位测试、重建失败率、对侧前交叉韧带损伤发生率、是否存在相关半月板损伤以及是否存在膝关节过伸。此外,还将 5 年随访时的评估结果与同一患者 2 年随访时的评估结果进行了比较:结果:共对 156 名患者进行了评估。结果:共对 156 名患者进行了评估,各组患者在术前评估中无明显差异。在术后评估中,ALL损伤组患者的重建失败率较高(14.3% 对对照组的4.6%;P = .049),根据Lysholm评分,临床效果较差(85.0 ± 10.3 对 92.3 ± 6.6;P < .00001)。虽然枢轴移位测试结果相似,但使用KT-1000关节测量仪进行的前向后平移显示,ALL损伤组的结果更差(2.8 ± 1.4 mm vs 1.9 ± 1.3 mm;P = .00018)。从 2 年到 5 年,ALL 损伤组患者的 KT-1000 关节测量计数值也有所增加(2.4 ± 1.6 vs 2.8 ± 1.4;P = .038)。对照组患者在2至5年的随访结果中没有差异:结论:在腘绳肌自体移植前交叉韧带孤立重建术后至少5年的随访中,前交叉韧带合并ALL损伤的预后明显不如前交叉韧带孤立损伤的预后好。合并ALL损伤的患者失败率更高,功能评分更差。此外,在伴有ALL损伤的病例中,膝关节稳定性从2年到5年期间略有恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信