A qualitative exploration of barriers, facilitators and best practices for implementing environmental sustainability standards and reducing food waste in veterans affairs hospitals

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Bethany D. Williams, Stephanie Jilcott Pitts, Stephen J. Onufrak, Emma Sirois, Anne Utech, Michelle Wood, Jessi Silverman, Funke Ajenikoko, Meghan Murphy, Amy Lowry Warnock
{"title":"A qualitative exploration of barriers, facilitators and best practices for implementing environmental sustainability standards and reducing food waste in veterans affairs hospitals","authors":"Bethany D. Williams,&nbsp;Stephanie Jilcott Pitts,&nbsp;Stephen J. Onufrak,&nbsp;Emma Sirois,&nbsp;Anne Utech,&nbsp;Michelle Wood,&nbsp;Jessi Silverman,&nbsp;Funke Ajenikoko,&nbsp;Meghan Murphy,&nbsp;Amy Lowry Warnock","doi":"10.1111/jhn.13357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To improve the healthfulness of foods offered while accelerating the use of environmental sustainability practices, it is important to engage hospital food service operators in the adoption of such practices. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers, facilitators and best practices for implementing environmental sustainability standards in food service among veterans affairs (VA) hospitals in the United States.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted an online survey with 14 VA hospital food service directors and then 11 qualitative interviews. The survey assessed motivations for initiating sustainability standards and included a self-rating of implementation for each of five standards: increasing plant-forward dishes, procuring and serving sustainable foods that meet organic/fair trade and other certifications, procuring and serving locally produced foods, reducing food waste and reducing energy consumption. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Qualitative analysis, including coding of themes and subthemes, was conducted by two coders to determine barriers, facilitators and best practices for each of these five standards. Quantitative methods (counts and frequencies) were used to analyse the survey data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants had an average of 5 years of experience implementing sustainability standards. The top three motivators cited were reducing food waste, serving healthier foods and increasing efficiency or cost savings. Barriers revolved around patient preferences, contractual difficulties and costs related to reducing waste. Facilitators included taste testing new recipes that include more sustainable food options and easy access to sustainable products from the prime vendor. Best practices included making familiar dishes plant-forward and plate waste studies to prevent overproduction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although there were many barriers to implementation, food service directors had solutions for overcoming challenges and implementing food service sustainability standards, which can be tested in future sustainability initiatives.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"37 6","pages":"1420-1431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jhn.13357","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jhn.13357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To improve the healthfulness of foods offered while accelerating the use of environmental sustainability practices, it is important to engage hospital food service operators in the adoption of such practices. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers, facilitators and best practices for implementing environmental sustainability standards in food service among veterans affairs (VA) hospitals in the United States.

Methods

We conducted an online survey with 14 VA hospital food service directors and then 11 qualitative interviews. The survey assessed motivations for initiating sustainability standards and included a self-rating of implementation for each of five standards: increasing plant-forward dishes, procuring and serving sustainable foods that meet organic/fair trade and other certifications, procuring and serving locally produced foods, reducing food waste and reducing energy consumption. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Qualitative analysis, including coding of themes and subthemes, was conducted by two coders to determine barriers, facilitators and best practices for each of these five standards. Quantitative methods (counts and frequencies) were used to analyse the survey data.

Results

Participants had an average of 5 years of experience implementing sustainability standards. The top three motivators cited were reducing food waste, serving healthier foods and increasing efficiency or cost savings. Barriers revolved around patient preferences, contractual difficulties and costs related to reducing waste. Facilitators included taste testing new recipes that include more sustainable food options and easy access to sustainable products from the prime vendor. Best practices included making familiar dishes plant-forward and plate waste studies to prevent overproduction.

Conclusions

Although there were many barriers to implementation, food service directors had solutions for overcoming challenges and implementing food service sustainability standards, which can be tested in future sustainability initiatives.

对退伍军人事务医院实施环境可持续性标准和减少食物浪费的障碍、促进因素和最佳实践进行定性探索。
背景:为了提高所提供食品的健康水平,同时加快环境可持续发展实践的使用,让医院餐饮服务经营者参与采用此类实践非常重要。本研究旨在探讨美国退伍军人事务(VA)医院在餐饮服务中实施环境可持续性标准的障碍、促进因素和最佳实践:我们对 14 家退伍军人医院的餐饮服务主管进行了在线调查,然后进行了 11 次定性访谈。调查评估了启动可持续发展标准的动机,并对以下五项标准的执行情况进行了自我评分:增加植物性菜肴、采购和供应符合有机/公平贸易和其他认证的可持续发展食品、采购和供应本地生产的食品、减少食物浪费和降低能耗。访谈内容逐字记录。由两名编码员进行定性分析,包括对主题和次主题进行编码,以确定这五个标准中每个标准的障碍、促进因素和最佳实践。定量方法(计数和频率)用于分析调查数据:结果:参与者平均有 5 年实施可持续发展标准的经验。他们提到的前三大动力是减少食物浪费、提供更健康的食物以及提高效率或节约成本。障碍主要是病人的喜好、合同困难以及与减少浪费有关的成本。促进因素包括对包含更多可持续食品选择的新食谱进行试吃,以及从主要供应商处轻松获得可持续产品。最佳做法包括将熟悉的菜肴改成植物性菜肴,并进行餐盘浪费研究,以防止生产过剩:尽管在实施过程中会遇到很多障碍,但餐饮服务总监们有办法克服挑战,实施餐饮服务可持续发展标准,这些办法可以在未来的可持续发展倡议中进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信