Dual and triple gene combinations of KRT5, KRT17, and S100A2 identify basal-like subtype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and correlate with survival outcome

IF 4.4 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Qiangxing Chen, Zixin Chen, Jing Zhang, Yunqiang Cai, Shangdi Wu, Du He, Ke Cheng, Xiafei Gu, Yu Cai, Xin Wang, Yongbin Li, Man Zhang, Zhong Wu, Bing Peng
{"title":"Dual and triple gene combinations of KRT5, KRT17, and S100A2 identify basal-like subtype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and correlate with survival outcome","authors":"Qiangxing Chen,&nbsp;Zixin Chen,&nbsp;Jing Zhang,&nbsp;Yunqiang Cai,&nbsp;Shangdi Wu,&nbsp;Du He,&nbsp;Ke Cheng,&nbsp;Xiafei Gu,&nbsp;Yu Cai,&nbsp;Xin Wang,&nbsp;Yongbin Li,&nbsp;Man Zhang,&nbsp;Zhong Wu,&nbsp;Bing Peng","doi":"10.1096/fj.202302484RR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a significant difference in prognosis and response to chemotherapy between basal and classical subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Further biomarkers are required to identify subtypes of PDAC. We selected candidate biomarkers via review articles. Correlations between these candidate markers and the PDAC molecular subtype gene sets were analyzed using bioinformatics, confirming the biomarkers for identifying classical and basal subtypes. Subsequently, 298 PDAC patients were included, and their tumor tissues were immunohistochemically stratified using these biomarkers. Survival data underwent analysis, including Cox proportional hazards modeling. Our results indicate that the pairwise and triple combinations of KRT5/KRT17/S100A2 exhibit a higher correlation coefficient with the basal-like subtype gene set, whereas the corresponding combinations of GATA6/HNF4A/TFF1 show a higher correlation with the classical subtype gene set. Whether analyzing unmatched or propensity-matched data, the overall survival time was significantly shorter for the basal subtype compared with the classical subtype (<i>p</i> &lt; .001), with basal subtype patients also facing a higher risk of mortality (HR = 4.017, 95% CI 2.675–6.032, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). In conclusion, the combined expression of KRT5, KRT17, and S100A2, in both pairwise and triple combinations, independently predicts shorter overall survival in PDAC patients and likely identifies the basal subtype. Similarly, the combined expression of GATA6, HNF4A, and TFF1, in the same manner, may indicate the classical subtype. In our study, the combined application of established biomarkers offers valuable insights for the prognostic evaluation of PDAC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50455,"journal":{"name":"FASEB Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1096/fj.202302484RR","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FASEB Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1096/fj.202302484RR","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a significant difference in prognosis and response to chemotherapy between basal and classical subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Further biomarkers are required to identify subtypes of PDAC. We selected candidate biomarkers via review articles. Correlations between these candidate markers and the PDAC molecular subtype gene sets were analyzed using bioinformatics, confirming the biomarkers for identifying classical and basal subtypes. Subsequently, 298 PDAC patients were included, and their tumor tissues were immunohistochemically stratified using these biomarkers. Survival data underwent analysis, including Cox proportional hazards modeling. Our results indicate that the pairwise and triple combinations of KRT5/KRT17/S100A2 exhibit a higher correlation coefficient with the basal-like subtype gene set, whereas the corresponding combinations of GATA6/HNF4A/TFF1 show a higher correlation with the classical subtype gene set. Whether analyzing unmatched or propensity-matched data, the overall survival time was significantly shorter for the basal subtype compared with the classical subtype (p < .001), with basal subtype patients also facing a higher risk of mortality (HR = 4.017, 95% CI 2.675–6.032, p < .001). In conclusion, the combined expression of KRT5, KRT17, and S100A2, in both pairwise and triple combinations, independently predicts shorter overall survival in PDAC patients and likely identifies the basal subtype. Similarly, the combined expression of GATA6, HNF4A, and TFF1, in the same manner, may indicate the classical subtype. In our study, the combined application of established biomarkers offers valuable insights for the prognostic evaluation of PDAC patients.

Abstract Image

KRT5、KRT17和S100A2的双基因和三基因组合可确定胰腺导管腺癌的基底样亚型,并与生存结果相关。
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的基础亚型和经典亚型在预后和对化疗的反应方面存在明显差异。需要更多的生物标志物来确定 PDAC 的亚型。我们通过综述文章选出了候选生物标志物。利用生物信息学分析了这些候选标记物与 PDAC 分子亚型基因集之间的相关性,确认了用于识别经典亚型和基础亚型的生物标记物。随后,研究人员纳入了 298 例 PDAC 患者,并利用这些生物标记物对其肿瘤组织进行了免疫组化分层。对生存数据进行了分析,包括 Cox 比例危险度模型。我们的结果表明,KRT5/KRT17/S100A2的成对组合和三重组合与基底样亚型基因集的相关系数较高,而GATA6/HNF4A/TFF1的相应组合与经典亚型基因集的相关系数较高。无论是分析未匹配数据还是倾向匹配数据,基底样亚型的总生存时间都明显短于经典亚型(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FASEB Journal
FASEB Journal 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
6243
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The FASEB Journal publishes international, transdisciplinary research covering all fields of biology at every level of organization: atomic, molecular, cell, tissue, organ, organismic and population. While the journal strives to include research that cuts across the biological sciences, it also considers submissions that lie within one field, but may have implications for other fields as well. The journal seeks to publish basic and translational research, but also welcomes reports of pre-clinical and early clinical research. In addition to research, review, and hypothesis submissions, The FASEB Journal also seeks perspectives, commentaries, book reviews, and similar content related to the life sciences in its Up Front section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信