The sexual and reproductive health knowledge of women in Australia: A scoping review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Natalie Williams, Georgia Griffin, Megan Wall, Zoe Bradfield
{"title":"The sexual and reproductive health knowledge of women in Australia: A scoping review.","authors":"Natalie Williams, Georgia Griffin, Megan Wall, Zoe Bradfield","doi":"10.1002/hpja.908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Issue addressed: </strong>Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) knowledge influences health literacy and promotes positive health behaviours. This scoping review explores the SRH knowledge of women in Australia and reports on knowledge assessment, ways of learning, enablers and barriers, and interventions to improve knowledge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases were searched for eligible articles published in English between 2012 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five sources were included for analysis. Data were mapped by knowledge topic and population group and charted against four review objectives. Assessment of knowledge was the primary focus in 59% of sources. Two sources used a validated knowledge assessment tool. Knowledge was assessed using self-assessment, a measurement of correctness, or both. Women learnt about SRH through a range of sources, including healthcare providers, peers, family, internet, and school. Enablers and barriers spanned information content, delivery, timing, accessibility, interactions with those providing information, cultural and gendered norms, pre-migration experiences, and functional health literacy. Nine sources reported on interventions to facilitate SRH knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identified topics, population groups, and gaps in assessment of SRH knowledge of women in Australia. Overall, the measurement of women's SRH knowledge is largely conducted using unvalidated tools focusing on specific topics. SO WHAT?: It is recommended a validated tool be developed to comprehensively assess the SRH knowledge of women in Australia allowing for intersectional population analysis and exploration of knowledge conceptualisation. This would enable assessment of interventions aiming to improve SRH knowledge thereby facilitating improved health literacy and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue addressed: Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) knowledge influences health literacy and promotes positive health behaviours. This scoping review explores the SRH knowledge of women in Australia and reports on knowledge assessment, ways of learning, enablers and barriers, and interventions to improve knowledge.

Methods: Seven databases were searched for eligible articles published in English between 2012 and 2022.

Results: Eighty-five sources were included for analysis. Data were mapped by knowledge topic and population group and charted against four review objectives. Assessment of knowledge was the primary focus in 59% of sources. Two sources used a validated knowledge assessment tool. Knowledge was assessed using self-assessment, a measurement of correctness, or both. Women learnt about SRH through a range of sources, including healthcare providers, peers, family, internet, and school. Enablers and barriers spanned information content, delivery, timing, accessibility, interactions with those providing information, cultural and gendered norms, pre-migration experiences, and functional health literacy. Nine sources reported on interventions to facilitate SRH knowledge.

Conclusions: This review identified topics, population groups, and gaps in assessment of SRH knowledge of women in Australia. Overall, the measurement of women's SRH knowledge is largely conducted using unvalidated tools focusing on specific topics. SO WHAT?: It is recommended a validated tool be developed to comprehensively assess the SRH knowledge of women in Australia allowing for intersectional population analysis and exploration of knowledge conceptualisation. This would enable assessment of interventions aiming to improve SRH knowledge thereby facilitating improved health literacy and outcomes.

澳大利亚妇女的性与生殖健康知识:范围审查。
解决的问题:性与生殖健康(SRH)知识影响健康素养并促进积极的健康行为。本范围界定综述探讨了澳大利亚妇女的性与生殖健康知识,并报告了知识评估、学习方法、促进因素和障碍以及改善知识的干预措施:方法:在七个数据库中检索了 2012 年至 2022 年间发表的符合条件的英文文章:结果:共纳入 85 篇资料进行分析。数据按知识主题和人群分类,并根据四个审查目标绘制图表。59%的资料来源以知识评估为主要重点。两个资料来源使用了经过验证的知识评估工具。知识评估采用自我评估、正确性测量或两者兼而有之的方法。妇女通过各种渠道了解性健康和生殖健康知识,包括医疗保健提供者、同伴、家庭、互联网和学校。促进因素和障碍包括信息内容、提供方式、时间安排、可获得性、与提供信息者的互动、文化和性别规范、移民前的经历以及功能性健康扫盲。九个资料来源报告了促进性健康和生殖健康知识的干预措施:本综述确定了澳大利亚妇女性健康和生殖健康知识评估的主题、人群和差距。总体而言,对妇女性健康和生殖健康知识的测量主要使用未经验证的工具,侧重于特定主题。所以呢?建议开发一种经过验证的工具来全面评估澳大利亚妇女的性健康和生殖健康知识,以便进行交叉人群分析和知识概念化探索。这将有助于对旨在提高性健康和生殖健康知识的干预措施进行评估,从而促进提高健康素养并改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信