'Someone must do it': multiple views on family's role in end-of-life care - an international qualitative study.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524241260425
Vilma A Tripodoro, Verónica I Veloso, Eva Víbora Martín, Hana Kodba-Čeh, Miša Bakan, Birgit H Rasmussen, Sofía C Zambrano, Melanie Joshi, Svandis Íris Hálfdánardóttir, Guðlaug Helga Ásgeirsdóttir, Elisabeth Romarheim, Dagny Faksvåg Haugen, Tamsin McGlinchey, Berivan Yildiz, Pilar Barnestein-Fonseca, Anne Goossensen, Urška Lunder, Agnes van der Heide
{"title":"'Someone must do it': multiple views on family's role in end-of-life care - an international qualitative study.","authors":"Vilma A Tripodoro, Verónica I Veloso, Eva Víbora Martín, Hana Kodba-Čeh, Miša Bakan, Birgit H Rasmussen, Sofía C Zambrano, Melanie Joshi, Svandis Íris Hálfdánardóttir, Guðlaug Helga Ásgeirsdóttir, Elisabeth Romarheim, Dagny Faksvåg Haugen, Tamsin McGlinchey, Berivan Yildiz, Pilar Barnestein-Fonseca, Anne Goossensen, Urška Lunder, Agnes van der Heide","doi":"10.1177/26323524241260425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family is a crucial social institution in end-of-life care. Family caregivers are encouraged to take on more responsibility at different times during the illness, providing personal and medical care. Unpaid work can be overburdening, with women often spending more time in care work than men.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored multiple views on the family's role in end-of-life care from a critical perspective and a relational autonomy lens, considering gender in a socio-cultural context and applying a relational autonomy framework. It explored patients, relatives and healthcare providers' points of view.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This qualitative study was part of the iLIVE project, involving patients with incurable diseases, their relatives and health carers from hospital and non-hospital sites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual interviews of at least five patients, five relatives and five healthcare providers in each of the 10 participating countries using a semi-structured interview guide based on Giger-Davidhizar-Haff's model for cultural assessment in end-of-life care. Thematic analysis was performed initially within each country and across the complete dataset. Data sources, including researchers' field notes, were translated into English for international collaborative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted 158 interviews (57 patients, 48 relatives and 53 healthcare providers). After collaborative analysis, five themes were identified across the countries: family as a finite care resource, families' active role in decision-making, open communication with the family, care burden and socio-cultural mandates. Families were crucial for providing informal care during severe illness, often acting as the only resource. Patients acknowledged the strain on carers, leading to a conceptual model highlighting socio-cultural influences, relational autonomy, care burden and feminisation of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Society, health teams and family systems still need to better support the role of family caregivers described across countries. The model implies that family roles in end-of-life care balance relational autonomy with socio-cultural values. Real-world end-of-life scenarios do not occur in a wholly individualistic, closed-off atmosphere but in an interpersonal setting. Gender is often prominent, but normative ideas influence the decisions and actions of all involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241260425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family is a crucial social institution in end-of-life care. Family caregivers are encouraged to take on more responsibility at different times during the illness, providing personal and medical care. Unpaid work can be overburdening, with women often spending more time in care work than men.

Objectives: This study explored multiple views on the family's role in end-of-life care from a critical perspective and a relational autonomy lens, considering gender in a socio-cultural context and applying a relational autonomy framework. It explored patients, relatives and healthcare providers' points of view.

Design: This qualitative study was part of the iLIVE project, involving patients with incurable diseases, their relatives and health carers from hospital and non-hospital sites.

Methods: Individual interviews of at least five patients, five relatives and five healthcare providers in each of the 10 participating countries using a semi-structured interview guide based on Giger-Davidhizar-Haff's model for cultural assessment in end-of-life care. Thematic analysis was performed initially within each country and across the complete dataset. Data sources, including researchers' field notes, were translated into English for international collaborative analysis.

Results: We conducted 158 interviews (57 patients, 48 relatives and 53 healthcare providers). After collaborative analysis, five themes were identified across the countries: family as a finite care resource, families' active role in decision-making, open communication with the family, care burden and socio-cultural mandates. Families were crucial for providing informal care during severe illness, often acting as the only resource. Patients acknowledged the strain on carers, leading to a conceptual model highlighting socio-cultural influences, relational autonomy, care burden and feminisation of care.

Conclusion: Society, health teams and family systems still need to better support the role of family caregivers described across countries. The model implies that family roles in end-of-life care balance relational autonomy with socio-cultural values. Real-world end-of-life scenarios do not occur in a wholly individualistic, closed-off atmosphere but in an interpersonal setting. Gender is often prominent, but normative ideas influence the decisions and actions of all involved.

必须有人去做":关于家人在临终关怀中的角色的多种观点--一项国际定性研究。
背景:家庭是临终关怀的重要社会机构。人们鼓励家庭照顾者在疾病的不同时期承担更多的责任,提供个人和医疗护理。无偿工作可能会使人负担过重,女性往往比男性花更多的时间从事护理工作:本研究从批判性视角和关系自主视角出发,探讨了家庭在临终关怀中的角色的多种观点,考虑了社会文化背景下的性别问题,并应用了关系自主框架。研究探讨了患者、亲属和医疗服务提供者的观点:这项定性研究是 iLIVE 项目的一部分,涉及医院和非医院的不治之症患者、其亲属和医护人员:方法:根据 Giger-Davidhizar-Haff 的临终关怀文化评估模型,使用半结构化访谈指南,在 10 个参与国家中的每个国家对至少 5 名患者、5 名亲属和 5 名医疗服务提供者进行个别访谈。首先在每个国家和整个数据集中进行了主题分析。数据源(包括研究人员的现场记录)被翻译成英文,以便进行国际合作分析:我们进行了 158 次访谈(57 位患者、48 位亲属和 53 位医疗服务提供者)。经过合作分析,确定了各国的五个主题:家庭是有限的护理资源、家庭在决策中的积极作用、与家庭的坦诚沟通、护理负担和社会文化任务。在重病期间,家庭是提供非正式护理的关键,往往是唯一的资源。患者承认照顾者的压力很大,从而形成了一个概念模型,强调了社会文化影响、关系自主、护理负担和护理女性化:结论:社会、医疗团队和家庭系统仍需更好地支持家庭护理者在各国所扮演的角色。该模型意味着家庭在临终关怀中的角色应在关系自主与社会文化价值观之间取得平衡。现实世界中的临终关怀并不是在完全个人主义、封闭的氛围中进行的,而是在人际交往的环境中进行的。性别问题往往比较突出,但规范观念会影响所有相关人员的决定和行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信