Comparing the effectiveness of a breastfeeding arm sling with the normal cross-cradle hold position: A quasi-experimental study in Thailand.

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-08-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/191253
Pornsri Disorntatiwat, Sudjit Liblub, Mary Steen
{"title":"Comparing the effectiveness of a breastfeeding arm sling with the normal cross-cradle hold position: A quasi-experimental study in Thailand.","authors":"Pornsri Disorntatiwat, Sudjit Liblub, Mary Steen","doi":"10.18332/ejm/191253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Thailand, the exclusive breastfeeding rate remains low at 14% in 2019, despite the World Health Organization's recommendation of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months. Many mothers experience challenges such as lack of confidence, fatigue, and discomfort while breastfeeding. To address these issues, the novel arm sling innovation device was developed to provide support during breastfeeding. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of breastfeeding using the arm sling versus the normal cross-cradle hold among first-time mothers and to evaluate their satisfaction with the breastfeeding arm sling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental crossover design was employed in the postpartum unit at Ramathibodi Hospital, Thailand, in 2022. Forty-six first-time mothers breastfed using both a breastfeeding arm sling and the normal cross-cradle hold, with a washout period in between. Breastfeeding effectiveness was measured by mothers and nurse-midwives using questionnaires, and mothers' satisfaction with the sling was assessed. Data were evaluated using descriptive statistics and t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The breastfeeding arm sling innovation significantly improved breastfeeding effectiveness compared to the normal cross-cradle hold, reported by both mothers (t=4.32, p<0.001) and nurse-midwives (t=8.93, p<0.001). Most mothers expressed satisfaction with the arm sling, though some design aspects, such as ease of use, require improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the breastfeeding arm sling can potentially improve breastfeeding experiences for first-time mothers. Further research is needed on a larger scale and in more diverse settings to confirm these findings and to improve the sling's design for user-friendliness.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/191253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In Thailand, the exclusive breastfeeding rate remains low at 14% in 2019, despite the World Health Organization's recommendation of exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months. Many mothers experience challenges such as lack of confidence, fatigue, and discomfort while breastfeeding. To address these issues, the novel arm sling innovation device was developed to provide support during breastfeeding. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of breastfeeding using the arm sling versus the normal cross-cradle hold among first-time mothers and to evaluate their satisfaction with the breastfeeding arm sling.

Methods: A quasi-experimental crossover design was employed in the postpartum unit at Ramathibodi Hospital, Thailand, in 2022. Forty-six first-time mothers breastfed using both a breastfeeding arm sling and the normal cross-cradle hold, with a washout period in between. Breastfeeding effectiveness was measured by mothers and nurse-midwives using questionnaires, and mothers' satisfaction with the sling was assessed. Data were evaluated using descriptive statistics and t-tests.

Results: The breastfeeding arm sling innovation significantly improved breastfeeding effectiveness compared to the normal cross-cradle hold, reported by both mothers (t=4.32, p<0.001) and nurse-midwives (t=8.93, p<0.001). Most mothers expressed satisfaction with the arm sling, though some design aspects, such as ease of use, require improvement.

Conclusions: This study suggests that the breastfeeding arm sling can potentially improve breastfeeding experiences for first-time mothers. Further research is needed on a larger scale and in more diverse settings to confirm these findings and to improve the sling's design for user-friendliness.

比较母乳喂养手臂吊衣与正常交叉抱枕姿势的效果:泰国的一项准实验研究。
导言:在泰国,尽管世界卫生组织建议在最初 6 个月进行纯母乳喂养,但 2019 年的纯母乳喂养率仍然很低,仅为 14%。许多母亲在母乳喂养时会遇到缺乏信心、疲劳和不适等挑战。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了新型臂式吊衣创新装置,为母乳喂养提供支持。本研究旨在比较初为人母者使用臂式吊衣和普通交叉抱枕进行母乳喂养的效果,并评估她们对母乳喂养臂式吊衣的满意度:方法:2022 年,在泰国拉玛提博迪医院产后病房采用了准实验交叉设计。46名初产妇同时使用母乳喂养臂吊衣和正常的交叉摇篮抱法进行母乳喂养,中间有一段冲洗期。母亲和助产士使用问卷对母乳喂养效果进行了测量,并评估了母亲对吊衣的满意度。数据采用描述性统计和 t 检验进行评估:结果:母乳喂养臂式吊衣创新与普通交叉摇篮抱法相比,明显提高了母乳喂养效果,两位母亲均有报告(t=4.32,p结论:母乳喂养臂式吊衣创新与普通交叉摇篮抱法相比,明显提高了母乳喂养效果,两位母亲均有报告(t=4.32,p结论):本研究表明,母乳喂养臂吊衣有可能改善初为人母者的母乳喂养体验。需要在更大范围和更多样化的环境中开展进一步研究,以证实这些发现,并改进吊衣的设计,使其更方便用户使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信