Quantitative determination of C-polysaccharide in Streptococcus pneumoniae capsular polysaccharides by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Piyush Kumar Paliwal, Burki Rajendar, Thirumeni Nagarajan, M.V.N. Janardhan Reddy, Amit Tripathi, Ramesh V. Matur
{"title":"Quantitative determination of C-polysaccharide in Streptococcus pneumoniae capsular polysaccharides by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay","authors":"Piyush Kumar Paliwal,&nbsp;Burki Rajendar,&nbsp;Thirumeni Nagarajan,&nbsp;M.V.N. Janardhan Reddy,&nbsp;Amit Tripathi,&nbsp;Ramesh V. Matur","doi":"10.1016/j.jim.2024.113734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Capsular polysaccharides of <em>Streptococcus pneumoniae</em> are used in pneumococcal polysaccharide and protein-conjugate vaccines. Cell-wall polysaccharide (C-Ps) is a critical impurity that must be kept at low levels in purified polysaccharide preparations. Hence, accurate and precise methods for determining C-Ps are needed. Currently available methods include nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD). Both these methods suffer from their own limitations; therefore, we developed a simple and efficient enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for accurate and precise quantification of C-Ps in samples of any serotype of pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide without interference. We quantified C-Ps in preparations of 14 serotype polysaccharides using newly developed ELISA method and compared the results with C-Ps values obtained using two previously reported methods, <sup>1</sup>H NMR and HPAEC-PAD. The C-Ps value determined using <sup>1</sup>H NMR for serotype 5 was 21.08%, whereas the values obtained using HPAEC-PAD and ELISA were 2.38% and 2.89% respectively, indicating some interference in <sup>1</sup>H NMR method. The sensitivity of the ELISA method is higher because the sample is used directly unlike HPAEC-PAD method where sample is subjected to harsh treatment, such as acid digestion and quantify C-Ps based on peak area of ribitol or AAT. Furthermore, <sup>1</sup>H NMR and HPAEC-PAD are expensive and laborious methods. Our work, underscores the simple and efficient ELISA that can be used for quantification of C-Ps in pneumococcal polysaccharide preparations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunological methods","volume":"533 ","pages":"Article 113734"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022175924001194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Capsular polysaccharides of Streptococcus pneumoniae are used in pneumococcal polysaccharide and protein-conjugate vaccines. Cell-wall polysaccharide (C-Ps) is a critical impurity that must be kept at low levels in purified polysaccharide preparations. Hence, accurate and precise methods for determining C-Ps are needed. Currently available methods include nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD). Both these methods suffer from their own limitations; therefore, we developed a simple and efficient enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for accurate and precise quantification of C-Ps in samples of any serotype of pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide without interference. We quantified C-Ps in preparations of 14 serotype polysaccharides using newly developed ELISA method and compared the results with C-Ps values obtained using two previously reported methods, 1H NMR and HPAEC-PAD. The C-Ps value determined using 1H NMR for serotype 5 was 21.08%, whereas the values obtained using HPAEC-PAD and ELISA were 2.38% and 2.89% respectively, indicating some interference in 1H NMR method. The sensitivity of the ELISA method is higher because the sample is used directly unlike HPAEC-PAD method where sample is subjected to harsh treatment, such as acid digestion and quantify C-Ps based on peak area of ribitol or AAT. Furthermore, 1H NMR and HPAEC-PAD are expensive and laborious methods. Our work, underscores the simple and efficient ELISA that can be used for quantification of C-Ps in pneumococcal polysaccharide preparations.

用酶联免疫吸附测定法定量测定肺炎链球菌荚膜多糖中的 C 多糖。
肺炎链球菌的囊壁多糖用于肺炎球菌多糖和蛋白结合疫苗。细胞壁多糖(C-Ps)是一种重要的杂质,在纯化的多糖制剂中必须保持较低的含量。因此,需要准确和精确的方法来测定 C-Ps。目前可用的方法包括核磁共振(NMR)光谱法和带脉冲安培检测(HPAEC-PAD)的高效阴离子交换色谱法。这两种方法都有各自的局限性;因此,我们开发了一种简单高效的酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA),可在不受干扰的情况下精确定量任何血清型肺炎球菌荚膜多糖样品中的 C-Ps。我们使用新开发的 ELISA 方法对 14 种血清型多糖制剂中的 C-Ps 进行了定量,并将结果与之前报道的两种方法(1H NMR 和 HPAEC-PAD)获得的 C-Ps 值进行了比较。使用 1H NMR 测定的血清型 5 的 C-Ps 值为 21.08%,而使用 HPAEC-PAD 和 ELISA 测定的 C-Ps 值分别为 2.38% 和 2.89%,这表明 1H NMR 方法存在一些干扰。ELISA 方法的灵敏度较高,因为它直接使用样品,而不像 HPAEC-PAD 方法那样对样品进行酸消化等苛刻处理,并根据核糖醇或 AAT 的峰面积对 C-Ps 进行定量。此外,1H NMR 和 HPAEC-PAD 方法既昂贵又费力。我们的工作强调了简单高效的酶联免疫吸附测定法可用于肺炎球菌多糖制剂中 C-Ps 的定量分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Immunological Methods is devoted to covering techniques for: (1) Quantitating and detecting antibodies and/or antigens. (2) Purifying immunoglobulins, lymphokines and other molecules of the immune system. (3) Isolating antigens and other substances important in immunological processes. (4) Labelling antigens and antibodies. (5) Localizing antigens and/or antibodies in tissues and cells. (6) Detecting, and fractionating immunocompetent cells. (7) Assaying for cellular immunity. (8) Documenting cell-cell interactions. (9) Initiating immunity and unresponsiveness. (10) Transplanting tissues. (11) Studying items closely related to immunity such as complement, reticuloendothelial system and others. (12) Molecular techniques for studying immune cells and their receptors. (13) Imaging of the immune system. (14) Methods for production or their fragments in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. In addition the journal will publish articles on novel methods for analysing the organization, structure and expression of genes for immunologically important molecules such as immunoglobulins, T cell receptors and accessory molecules involved in antigen recognition, processing and presentation. Submitted full length manuscripts should describe new methods of broad applicability to immunology and not simply the application of an established method to a particular substance - although papers describing such applications may be considered for publication as a short Technical Note. Review articles will also be published by the Journal of Immunological Methods. In general these manuscripts are by solicitation however anyone interested in submitting a review can contact the Reviews Editor and provide an outline of the proposed review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信