Gabriele Masini, Luna Gargani, Carmela Morizzo, Giacinta Guarini, Ida Rebecca Bort, Matteo Baldini, Pietro Paolo Tamborrino, Carlo Vitale, Carlo Palombo, Raffaele De Caterina
{"title":"Prognostic impact of peripheral artery disease-related parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome.","authors":"Gabriele Masini, Luna Gargani, Carmela Morizzo, Giacinta Guarini, Ida Rebecca Bort, Matteo Baldini, Pietro Paolo Tamborrino, Carlo Vitale, Carlo Palombo, Raffaele De Caterina","doi":"10.2459/JCM.0000000000001653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) and increased aortic stiffness are associated with higher mortality in patients with chronic coronary syndrome, while their prognostic significance after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is less known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed prevalence, clinical phenotypes and association of LEAD - assessed by the ankle-brachial index (ABI) - and increased aortic stiffness - assessed by the aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) - with all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients admitted with an ACS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 270 patients admitted for ACS (mean age 67 years, 80% males), 41 (15%) had an ABI ≤0.9, with 14 of them (34%) presenting with intermittent claudication (symptomatic LEAD). Patients with symptomatic LEAD, compared with those with asymptomatic LEAD or without LEAD, had higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Patients with LEAD, either symptomatic or asymptomatic, more frequently presented with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and more frequently had multivessel coronary artery disease. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic LEAD were significantly associated with all-cause mortality after adjustment for confounders, including multivessel disease or carotid artery disease (hazard ratio 4.03, 95% confidence interval 1.61-10.08, P < 0.01), whereas PWV was not associated with the outcome in the univariable model. LEAD and PWV were not associated with a higher risk of MACE (myocardial infarction or unstable angina, stroke, or transient ischemic attack).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LEAD, either clinical or subclinical, but not increased aortic stiffness, is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients admitted for ACS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"749-756"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001653","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) and increased aortic stiffness are associated with higher mortality in patients with chronic coronary syndrome, while their prognostic significance after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is less known.
Methods: We analyzed prevalence, clinical phenotypes and association of LEAD - assessed by the ankle-brachial index (ABI) - and increased aortic stiffness - assessed by the aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) - with all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients admitted with an ACS.
Results: Among 270 patients admitted for ACS (mean age 67 years, 80% males), 41 (15%) had an ABI ≤0.9, with 14 of them (34%) presenting with intermittent claudication (symptomatic LEAD). Patients with symptomatic LEAD, compared with those with asymptomatic LEAD or without LEAD, had higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Patients with LEAD, either symptomatic or asymptomatic, more frequently presented with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and more frequently had multivessel coronary artery disease. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic LEAD were significantly associated with all-cause mortality after adjustment for confounders, including multivessel disease or carotid artery disease (hazard ratio 4.03, 95% confidence interval 1.61-10.08, P < 0.01), whereas PWV was not associated with the outcome in the univariable model. LEAD and PWV were not associated with a higher risk of MACE (myocardial infarction or unstable angina, stroke, or transient ischemic attack).
Conclusions: LEAD, either clinical or subclinical, but not increased aortic stiffness, is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in patients admitted for ACS.
背景:下肢动脉疾病(LEAD)和主动脉僵硬度升高与慢性冠状动脉综合征患者的死亡率升高有关,而它们在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)后的预后意义却鲜为人知:我们分析了以踝肱指数(ABI)为评估指标的LEAD和以主动脉脉搏波速度(PWV)为评估指标的主动脉僵化增加的患病率、临床表型以及它们与急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)入院患者的全因死亡率和主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的关联:在 270 名因 ACS 入院的患者(平均年龄 67 岁,80% 为男性)中,41 人(15%)的 ABI ≤0.9,其中 14 人(34%)伴有间歇性跛行(症状性 LEAD)。与无症状 LEAD 患者或无 LEAD 患者相比,有症状 LEAD 患者的心血管风险因素发生率更高,估计肾小球滤过率更低,高敏 C 反应蛋白更高。无论是有症状还是无症状的LEAD患者,都更常发生非ST段抬高型心肌梗死,而且更常患有多支冠状动脉疾病。在对包括多支血管疾病或颈动脉疾病在内的混杂因素进行调整后,无症状和无症状LEAD均与全因死亡率显著相关(危险比为4.03,95%置信区间为1.61-10.08,P 结论:无症状和无症状LEAD均与全因死亡率显著相关(危险比为4.03,95%置信区间为1.61-10.08,P 结论):临床或亚临床LEAD,而非主动脉僵硬度增加,是ACS住院患者全因死亡率的独立预测因素。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine is a monthly publication of the Italian Federation of Cardiology. It publishes original research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, case reports, design and goals of clinical trials, review articles, points of view, editorials and Images in cardiovascular medicine.
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.