Economic burden of suicides and suicide attempts in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of costing studies.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nikhil Jain, Ben Wijnen, Isha Lohumi, Susmita Chatterjee, Silvia M A A Evers
{"title":"Economic burden of suicides and suicide attempts in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of costing studies.","authors":"Nikhil Jain, Ben Wijnen, Isha Lohumi, Susmita Chatterjee, Silvia M A A Evers","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2388132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Suicide is a major public health concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to its substantial psychological, social, and economic impact. There is little synthesized evidence to estimate the economic burden of suicide and suicide attempts in such economies. The present systematic literature review aims to examine existing evidence on the cost of illness (COI) in the case of suicides and suicide attempts and assess their quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was carried out using electronic databases, such as Medline, EMBASE, EconLit, PsycINFO, and CINAHL using keywords like 'suicide and suicide attempts,' 'cost of illness,' and economic burden.\" The quality assessment of studies was conducted along with the per-person cost estimation to understand the variation of methods followed across the studies.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>14 studies qualified for final data extraction and synthesis out of 4,164 studies. The studies showed heterogeneity across objectives, settings, and methods, with cost estimates reflecting a wide range of costings per person in suicide and suicide attempts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is challenging to determine and compare the economic estimates of suicide. Intensive research is warranted with standardized cost assessment techniques and wider perspectives to understand the true economic burden of suicide.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO Registration No- CRD42022294080.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2388132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Suicide is a major public health concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to its substantial psychological, social, and economic impact. There is little synthesized evidence to estimate the economic burden of suicide and suicide attempts in such economies. The present systematic literature review aims to examine existing evidence on the cost of illness (COI) in the case of suicides and suicide attempts and assess their quality.

Methods: A systematic review was carried out using electronic databases, such as Medline, EMBASE, EconLit, PsycINFO, and CINAHL using keywords like 'suicide and suicide attempts,' 'cost of illness,' and economic burden." The quality assessment of studies was conducted along with the per-person cost estimation to understand the variation of methods followed across the studies.

Result: 14 studies qualified for final data extraction and synthesis out of 4,164 studies. The studies showed heterogeneity across objectives, settings, and methods, with cost estimates reflecting a wide range of costings per person in suicide and suicide attempts.

Conclusion: It is challenging to determine and compare the economic estimates of suicide. Intensive research is warranted with standardized cost assessment techniques and wider perspectives to understand the true economic burden of suicide.

Registration: PROSPERO Registration No- CRD42022294080.

中低收入国家自杀和自杀未遂的经济负担:成本计算研究的系统回顾。
导言:自杀是中低收入国家(LMICs)的一个主要公共卫生问题,因为自杀会对心理、社会和经济产生重大影响。目前几乎没有综合证据来估算自杀和自杀未遂对这些经济体造成的经济负担。本系统性文献综述旨在研究自杀和自杀未遂案例中疾病成本(COI)的现有证据,并评估其质量:利用 Medline、EMBASE、EconLit、PsycINFO 和 CINAHL 等电子数据库,使用 "自杀和自杀未遂"、"疾病成本 "和 "经济负担 "等关键词进行了系统性综述。结果:在 4,164 项研究中,有 14 项研究符合最终数据提取和综合的条件。这些研究在目标、环境和方法上存在差异,其成本估算反映出自杀和自杀未遂的人均成本差异很大:结论:确定和比较自杀的经济估算具有挑战性。结论:确定和比较自杀的经济估算具有挑战性,需要利用标准化的成本评估技术和更广泛的视角进行深入研究,以了解自杀的真正经济负担:PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022294080。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信