A Review of Surgical Incisions Used for the Excision of Benign Parotid Tumors.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Junhao Zeng, Jianrui Li, Mariam Saad, William C Lineaweaver, Fazhi Qi, Yuyan Pan
{"title":"A Review of Surgical Incisions Used for the Excision of Benign Parotid Tumors.","authors":"Junhao Zeng, Jianrui Li, Mariam Saad, William C Lineaweaver, Fazhi Qi, Yuyan Pan","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000003932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide surgical references for selecting appropriate parotidectomy incisions, reviewing modified approaches, incision designs, and associated complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have systematically searched 5 medical literature databases examining parotidectomy incision designs and postoperative complications from 2008 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There are a total of 9 novel incision designs: 1) posterior auricular hairline incision (PAHI); 2) combined preauricular and retroauricular incision (CPRI); 3) V-shaped incision (VI); 4) N-shaped incision (NI); 5) postaural incision (PI); 6) preauricular crutch incision (PCI); and 7) endaural incision (EI). Simultaneously, there are a total of 8 postoperative complications: 1) infection; 2) salivary fistula; 3) facial nerve palsy/paresis; 4) ear lobule numbness; 5) Frey syndrome; 6) facial deformity; 7) hematoma; and 8) tumor reoccurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over the last decade, a surge in modified parotidectomy incisions has been witnessed in clinical practice. This expansion is attributed to rapid technical advancements and a deeper understanding of anatomy and histopathology. These modified approaches contribute significantly to improving cosmetic outcomes, minimizing associated complications, and enhancing patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003932","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To provide surgical references for selecting appropriate parotidectomy incisions, reviewing modified approaches, incision designs, and associated complications.

Methods: We have systematically searched 5 medical literature databases examining parotidectomy incision designs and postoperative complications from 2008 to 2021.

Results: There are a total of 9 novel incision designs: 1) posterior auricular hairline incision (PAHI); 2) combined preauricular and retroauricular incision (CPRI); 3) V-shaped incision (VI); 4) N-shaped incision (NI); 5) postaural incision (PI); 6) preauricular crutch incision (PCI); and 7) endaural incision (EI). Simultaneously, there are a total of 8 postoperative complications: 1) infection; 2) salivary fistula; 3) facial nerve palsy/paresis; 4) ear lobule numbness; 5) Frey syndrome; 6) facial deformity; 7) hematoma; and 8) tumor reoccurrence.

Conclusions: Over the last decade, a surge in modified parotidectomy incisions has been witnessed in clinical practice. This expansion is attributed to rapid technical advancements and a deeper understanding of anatomy and histopathology. These modified approaches contribute significantly to improving cosmetic outcomes, minimizing associated complications, and enhancing patient satisfaction.

用于切除腮腺良性肿瘤的手术切口回顾。
目的:为选择合适的腮腺切除术切口提供手术参考:为选择合适的腮腺切除术切口提供手术参考,回顾改良方法、切口设计和相关并发症:我们系统检索了5个医学文献数据库,研究了2008年至2021年间腮腺切除术切口设计和术后并发症:结果:共有9种新型切口设计:1) 耳后发际切口 (PAHI);2) 耳前耳后联合切口 (CPRI);3) V 形切口 (VI);4) N 形切口 (NI);5) 耳后切口 (PI);6) 耳前拐杖切口 (PCI);7) 耳内切口 (EI)。同时,术后并发症共有 8 种:1) 感染;2) 唾液瘘;3) 面神经麻痹/瘫痪;4) 耳小叶麻木;5) Frey 综合征;6) 面部畸形;7) 血肿;8) 肿瘤再发:在过去十年中,临床实践中出现了改良腮腺切除术切口的激增。这种扩张归功于技术的快速进步以及对解剖学和组织病理学的深入了解。这些改良方法大大有助于改善美容效果、减少相关并发症并提高患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信