A systematic review of preclinical studies targeted toward the management of co-existing functional gastrointestinal disorders, stress, and gut dysbiosis

Shreyashi Pal, Ruhi Arisha, Papiya Mitra Mazumder
{"title":"A systematic review of preclinical studies targeted toward the management of co-existing functional gastrointestinal disorders, stress, and gut dysbiosis","authors":"Shreyashi Pal, Ruhi Arisha, Papiya Mitra Mazumder","doi":"10.1007/s00210-024-03332-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Modern dietary habits and stressed lifestyle have escalated the tendency to develop functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) through alteration in the gut-brain-microbiome axis. Clinical practices use symptomatic treatments, neglect root causes, and prolong distress in patients. The past decade has seen the evolution of various interventions to attenuate FGIDs. But clinical translation of such studies is very rare mostly due to lack of awareness. The aim of this review is to meticulously integrate different studies and bridge this knowledge gap. Literature between 2013 and 2023 was retrieved from PubMed, ProQuest, and Web of Science. The data was extracted based on the PRISMA guidelines and using the SYRCLE’s risk of bias and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools, quality assessment was performed. The review has highlighted molecular insights into the coexistence of FGIDs, stress, and gut dysbiosis. Furthermore, novel interventions focusing on diet, probiotics, herbal formulations, and phytoconstituents were explored which mostly had a multitargeted approach for the management of the diseases. Scientific literature implied positive interactions between the interventions and the gut microbiome by increasing the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria and reducing stress-related hormones. Moreover, the interventions reduced intestinal inflammation and regulated the expression of epithelial tight junction proteins in different in vivo models. This systematic review delves deep into the preclinical interventions to manage coexisting FGIDs, stress, and gut dysbiosis. However, in most of the discussed studies, long-term risks and toxicity profile of the interventions are lacking. So, it is necessary to highlight them for improved clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18862,"journal":{"name":"Naunyn-schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naunyn-schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-024-03332-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern dietary habits and stressed lifestyle have escalated the tendency to develop functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) through alteration in the gut-brain-microbiome axis. Clinical practices use symptomatic treatments, neglect root causes, and prolong distress in patients. The past decade has seen the evolution of various interventions to attenuate FGIDs. But clinical translation of such studies is very rare mostly due to lack of awareness. The aim of this review is to meticulously integrate different studies and bridge this knowledge gap. Literature between 2013 and 2023 was retrieved from PubMed, ProQuest, and Web of Science. The data was extracted based on the PRISMA guidelines and using the SYRCLE’s risk of bias and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools, quality assessment was performed. The review has highlighted molecular insights into the coexistence of FGIDs, stress, and gut dysbiosis. Furthermore, novel interventions focusing on diet, probiotics, herbal formulations, and phytoconstituents were explored which mostly had a multitargeted approach for the management of the diseases. Scientific literature implied positive interactions between the interventions and the gut microbiome by increasing the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria and reducing stress-related hormones. Moreover, the interventions reduced intestinal inflammation and regulated the expression of epithelial tight junction proteins in different in vivo models. This systematic review delves deep into the preclinical interventions to manage coexisting FGIDs, stress, and gut dysbiosis. However, in most of the discussed studies, long-term risks and toxicity profile of the interventions are lacking. So, it is necessary to highlight them for improved clinical outcomes.

Abstract Image

针对同时存在的功能性胃肠道疾病、压力和肠道菌群失调管理的临床前研究的系统回顾
现代饮食习惯和紧张的生活方式通过改变肠道-大脑-微生物组轴,使功能性胃肠病(FGID)的发病趋势不断上升。临床实践采用对症治疗,忽视了根本原因,延长了患者的痛苦。过去十年间,各种干预措施不断发展,以减轻 FGIDs 的病情。但由于缺乏认识,这些研究的临床转化非常罕见。本综述旨在对不同研究进行细致整合,弥补这一知识空白。我们从 PubMed、ProQuest 和 Web of Science 上检索了 2013 年至 2023 年间的文献。根据PRISMA指南提取数据,并使用SYRCLE偏倚风险和Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行质量评估。综述强调了对 FGIDs、压力和肠道菌群失调共存的分子认识。此外,还探讨了以饮食、益生菌、草药配方和植物成分为重点的新型干预措施,这些措施大多采用多目标方法来治疗疾病。科学文献表明,干预措施与肠道微生物组之间存在积极的相互作用,增加了有益菌的相对丰度,减少了与压力有关的激素。此外,在不同的体内模型中,干预措施可减少肠道炎症并调节上皮紧密连接蛋白的表达。本系统综述深入探讨了临床前干预措施,以控制并存的 FGIDs、压力和肠道菌群失调。然而,在讨论的大多数研究中,缺乏干预措施的长期风险和毒性概况。因此,有必要强调这些干预措施,以改善临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信