Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Using RCC and PCC

IF 2.9 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS
Coatings Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.3390/coatings14080972
Jiawei Fan, Yiyu Long, Juntao Xu, Shumao Qiu, Wei Qiao
{"title":"Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Using RCC and PCC","authors":"Jiawei Fan, Yiyu Long, Juntao Xu, Shumao Qiu, Wei Qiao","doi":"10.3390/coatings14080972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The addition of macro fibers to concrete pavements has been used to improve the cracking of concrete pavement, reduce slab thickness and contribute to increasing the joint spacing. A laboratory test was carried out in the study to analyze the impact of fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) on plain cement concrete (PCC) and roller compacted concrete (RCC), determining the flexural strength by performing ASTM-1609 tests and compressive strength by ASTM C-39 tests. Two synthetic fiber types selected with different geometries and different dosages (0.25% and 0.5% by volume) were tested for both RCC and PCC. To examine the effect of fiber contents and property, statistical testing was done using strength-test data. The test result showed that flexural strength was not affected by fibers. As fiber content increased, both residual strength (F600 and F150) and specimen toughness (T150) increased for each fiber type. To the contrary, the compressive strength of specimens with higher fiber contents was lower in every case. Fiber properties including length and shape affected the residual strength of RCC more, than PCC. It is notable that the residual strength of RCC and PCC with the same fiber condition is very similar, even though the mix design and compressive and flexural strengths are different. In this paper, the strength-test data results are discussed, and the factors affecting the test results and the limitations of the testing methods are suggested.","PeriodicalId":10520,"journal":{"name":"Coatings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coatings","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14080972","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The addition of macro fibers to concrete pavements has been used to improve the cracking of concrete pavement, reduce slab thickness and contribute to increasing the joint spacing. A laboratory test was carried out in the study to analyze the impact of fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) on plain cement concrete (PCC) and roller compacted concrete (RCC), determining the flexural strength by performing ASTM-1609 tests and compressive strength by ASTM C-39 tests. Two synthetic fiber types selected with different geometries and different dosages (0.25% and 0.5% by volume) were tested for both RCC and PCC. To examine the effect of fiber contents and property, statistical testing was done using strength-test data. The test result showed that flexural strength was not affected by fibers. As fiber content increased, both residual strength (F600 and F150) and specimen toughness (T150) increased for each fiber type. To the contrary, the compressive strength of specimens with higher fiber contents was lower in every case. Fiber properties including length and shape affected the residual strength of RCC more, than PCC. It is notable that the residual strength of RCC and PCC with the same fiber condition is very similar, even though the mix design and compressive and flexural strengths are different. In this paper, the strength-test data results are discussed, and the factors affecting the test results and the limitations of the testing methods are suggested.
使用 RCC 和 PCC 的纤维增强混凝土力学性能分析
在混凝土路面中添加大纤维已被用于改善混凝土路面的开裂情况、减少板厚度并有助于增加接缝间距。研究中进行了一项实验室测试,分析纤维增强混凝土(FRC)对素水泥混凝土(PCC)和碾压混凝土(RCC)的影响,通过 ASTM-1609 测试确定抗折强度,通过 ASTM C-39 测试确定抗压强度。针对 RCC 和 PCC 测试了两种不同几何形状和不同用量(按体积计算分别为 0.25% 和 0.5%)的合成纤维。为了研究纤维含量和性能的影响,使用强度测试数据进行了统计测试。测试结果表明,抗弯强度不受纤维的影响。随着纤维含量的增加,每种纤维的残余强度(F600 和 F150)和试样韧性(T150)都有所增加。相反,纤维含量越高的试样抗压强度越低。纤维特性(包括长度和形状)对 RCC 残余强度的影响大于 PCC。值得注意的是,尽管混合设计、抗压和抗弯强度不同,但在相同纤维条件下,RCC 和 PCC 的残余强度非常相似。本文讨论了强度测试数据结果,并提出了影响测试结果的因素和测试方法的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Coatings
Coatings Materials Science-Surfaces, Coatings and Films
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
1657
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Coatings is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of coatings and surface engineering. It publishes reviews, research articles, communications and technical notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: * manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed * electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure - if unable to be published in a normal way - can be deposited as supplementary material
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信