Elevated remnant cholesterol improves prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke and malnutrition: a cohort-based study

Jing Zhao, Huicong Niu, Yong Wang, Ning Yang, Min Chu, Xueyu Mao, Daosheng Wang
{"title":"Elevated remnant cholesterol improves prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke and malnutrition: a cohort-based study","authors":"Jing Zhao, Huicong Niu, Yong Wang, Ning Yang, Min Chu, Xueyu Mao, Daosheng Wang","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.31.24311324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy is recommended for patients with ischemic stroke; however, lipid paradox has been reported in several clinical studies. The mechanism of lipid paradox remains uncertain, and nutrition maybe one explanation. In this prospective cohort study, we explored the associations between baseline remnant cholesterol (RC) concentrations and clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke, stratified by nutritional status. Materials and Methods: A total of 5257 patients with ischemic stroke were recruited for analysis. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score was utilized to investigate the risk of malnutrition. Individuals were classified into 4 groups based on their CONUT score. Poor outcomes and all-cause mortality were compared among patients with varied nutritional status and RC levels.\nResults: Patients with moderate-severe malnutrition had the highest incidences of in-hospital complications, including pulmonary infection, renal dysfunction, and hemorrhagic transformation, and the highest rates of poor outcomes (61.3%, P?0.001) and all-cause mortality (32.8%, P?0.001) during the 3-month follow-up period. Baseline higher RC level was an independent protective factor of adverse clinical outcomes for patients with any degree of malnutrition, which was not observed in patients without malnutrition. In addition, compared with the moderate-severe malnourished with RC ?0.471 mmol/L, the adjusted ORs for poor outcomes and all-cause mortality were 0.805 (0.450?1.438) and 0.898 (0.502-1.607) for participants with 0.471-0.632 mmol/L, 0.259 (0.095-0.704) and 0.222 (0.061-0.810) for 0.633-0.868 mmol/L, and 0.160 (0.037?0.689) and 0.202 (0.042-0.967) for ? 0.869 mmol/L, prospectively. Conclusion: Lipid paradox was only observed in the malnourished patients with ischemic stroke. Strict lipid reduction therapy is still recommended for patients with ischemic stroke and good nutritional status. However, when treating patients at any risk of malnutrition, the improvement of nutritional status may be more crucial than aggressive lipid control.","PeriodicalId":501367,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Neurology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.31.24311324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy is recommended for patients with ischemic stroke; however, lipid paradox has been reported in several clinical studies. The mechanism of lipid paradox remains uncertain, and nutrition maybe one explanation. In this prospective cohort study, we explored the associations between baseline remnant cholesterol (RC) concentrations and clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke, stratified by nutritional status. Materials and Methods: A total of 5257 patients with ischemic stroke were recruited for analysis. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score was utilized to investigate the risk of malnutrition. Individuals were classified into 4 groups based on their CONUT score. Poor outcomes and all-cause mortality were compared among patients with varied nutritional status and RC levels. Results: Patients with moderate-severe malnutrition had the highest incidences of in-hospital complications, including pulmonary infection, renal dysfunction, and hemorrhagic transformation, and the highest rates of poor outcomes (61.3%, P?0.001) and all-cause mortality (32.8%, P?0.001) during the 3-month follow-up period. Baseline higher RC level was an independent protective factor of adverse clinical outcomes for patients with any degree of malnutrition, which was not observed in patients without malnutrition. In addition, compared with the moderate-severe malnourished with RC ?0.471 mmol/L, the adjusted ORs for poor outcomes and all-cause mortality were 0.805 (0.450?1.438) and 0.898 (0.502-1.607) for participants with 0.471-0.632 mmol/L, 0.259 (0.095-0.704) and 0.222 (0.061-0.810) for 0.633-0.868 mmol/L, and 0.160 (0.037?0.689) and 0.202 (0.042-0.967) for ? 0.869 mmol/L, prospectively. Conclusion: Lipid paradox was only observed in the malnourished patients with ischemic stroke. Strict lipid reduction therapy is still recommended for patients with ischemic stroke and good nutritional status. However, when treating patients at any risk of malnutrition, the improvement of nutritional status may be more crucial than aggressive lipid control.
残余胆固醇升高可改善缺血性中风和营养不良患者的预后:一项基于队列的研究
背景:建议缺血性脑卒中患者接受积极的降脂治疗,但在多项临床研究中均有血脂悖论的报道。血脂悖论的机制仍不确定,营养可能是其中一种解释。在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们探讨了缺血性脑卒中患者基线残余胆固醇(RC)浓度与临床预后之间的关系,并根据营养状况进行了分层。材料与方法:共招募了 5257 名缺血性中风患者进行分析。利用营养状况控制(CONUT)评分来调查营养不良的风险。根据 CONUT 评分将患者分为 4 组。比较了不同营养状况和 RC 水平患者的不良预后和全因死亡率:结果:中度-重度营养不良患者的院内并发症发生率最高,包括肺部感染、肾功能障碍和出血性转化,3 个月随访期间的不良预后率(61.3%,P?0.001)和全因死亡率(32.8%,P?0.001)也最高。对于任何程度的营养不良患者来说,基线较高的RC水平都是不良临床结局的一个独立保护因素,而在没有营养不良的患者中却没有观察到这一点。此外,与RC为0.471 mmol/L的中重度营养不良患者相比,不良预后和全因死亡率的调整OR值分别为0.805 (0.450?1.438) 和0.898 (0. 502-1.607) 。502-1.607),0.633-0.868 mmol/L为0.259 (0.095-0.704)和0.222 (0.061-0.810),?0.869毫摩尔/升为 0.160(0.037?结论只有营养不良的缺血性脑卒中患者才会出现血脂悖论。对于营养状况良好的缺血性脑卒中患者,仍建议进行严格的降脂治疗。然而,在治疗有营养不良风险的患者时,改善营养状况可能比积极控制血脂更为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信