Effects of short-term isolation on vocal and non-vocal social behaviors in prairie voles

Jesus E. Madrid, Nicole M. Pranic, Samantha Chu, Johanna J. D. Bergstrom, Rhea Singh, Joclin Rabinovich, Kaycee Arias Lopez, Alexander G. Ophir, Katherine A. Tschida
{"title":"Effects of short-term isolation on vocal and non-vocal social behaviors in prairie voles","authors":"Jesus E. Madrid, Nicole M. Pranic, Samantha Chu, Johanna J. D. Bergstrom, Rhea Singh, Joclin Rabinovich, Kaycee Arias Lopez, Alexander G. Ophir, Katherine A. Tschida","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.02.605822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social isolation affects the brain and behavior in a variety of animals, including humans. Studies in traditional laboratory rodents, including mice and rats, have supported the idea that short-term social isolation promotes affiliative social behaviors, while long-term isolation promotes anti-social behaviors, including increased aggression. Whether the effects of isolation on the social behaviors of mice and rats generalize to other rodents remains understudied. In the current study, we characterized the effects of short-term (3-days) social isolation on the vocal and non-vocal social behaviors of adult prairie voles (<em>Microtus ochrogaster</em>) during same-sex and opposite-sex social interactions. Our experiments revealed that short-term isolation did not affect rates of ultrasonic vocalizations or time spent in non-aggressive social behaviors and huddling. In contrast, short-term isolation affected aggression in a sex- and context-specific manner during male-male interactions. Our findings highlight the importance of comparative work across species and the consideration of social context to understand the diverse ways in which social isolation can impact social behavior.","PeriodicalId":501210,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Animal Behavior and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.02.605822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social isolation affects the brain and behavior in a variety of animals, including humans. Studies in traditional laboratory rodents, including mice and rats, have supported the idea that short-term social isolation promotes affiliative social behaviors, while long-term isolation promotes anti-social behaviors, including increased aggression. Whether the effects of isolation on the social behaviors of mice and rats generalize to other rodents remains understudied. In the current study, we characterized the effects of short-term (3-days) social isolation on the vocal and non-vocal social behaviors of adult prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) during same-sex and opposite-sex social interactions. Our experiments revealed that short-term isolation did not affect rates of ultrasonic vocalizations or time spent in non-aggressive social behaviors and huddling. In contrast, short-term isolation affected aggression in a sex- and context-specific manner during male-male interactions. Our findings highlight the importance of comparative work across species and the consideration of social context to understand the diverse ways in which social isolation can impact social behavior.
短期隔离对草原田鼠发声和非发声社会行为的影响
社会隔离会影响包括人类在内的各种动物的大脑和行为。对包括小鼠和大鼠在内的传统实验啮齿动物的研究支持这样一种观点,即短期的社会隔离会促进附属性社会行为,而长期的隔离则会促进反社会行为,包括增加攻击性。隔离对小鼠和大鼠社会行为的影响是否会推广到其他啮齿类动物,目前仍未得到充分研究。在本研究中,我们描述了短期(3 天)社会隔离对成年草原田鼠(Microtus ochrogaster)在同性和异性社会互动中的发声和非发声社会行为的影响。我们的实验表明,短期隔离不会影响超声波发声率,也不会影响非攻击性社会行为和蜷缩所花费的时间。相反,在雄性与雄性的互动中,短期隔离会以性别和特定环境的方式影响攻击行为。我们的发现凸显了跨物种比较工作和考虑社会背景对理解社会隔离影响社会行为的不同方式的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信