{"title":"Which Coupled is Best Coupled? An Exploration of AIMC Tile Interfaces and Load Balancing for CNNs","authors":"Joshua Klein;Irem Boybat;Giovanni Ansaloni;Marina Zapater;David Atienza","doi":"10.1109/TPDS.2024.3437657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to stringent energy and performance constraints, edge AI computing often employs heterogeneous systems that utilize both general-purpose CPUs and accelerators. Analog in-memory computing (AIMC) is a well-known AI inference solution that overcomes computational bottlenecks by performing matrix-vector multiplication operations (MVMs) in constant time. However, the tiles of AIMC-based accelerators are limited by the number of weights they can hold. State-of-the-art research often sizes neural networks to AIMC tiles (or vice-versa), but does not consider cases where AIMC tiles cannot cover the whole network due to lack of tile resources or the network size. In this work, we study the trade-offs of available AIMC tile resources, neural network coverage, AIMC tile proximity to compute resources, and multi-core load balancing techniques. We first perform a study of single-layer performance and energy scalability of AIMC tiles in the two most typical AIMC acceleration targets: dense/fully-connected layers and convolutional layers. This study guides the methodology with which we approach parameter allocation to AIMC tiles in the context of large edge neural networks, both where AIMC tiles are close to the CPU (tightly-coupled) and cannot share resources across the system, and where AIMC tiles are far from the CPU (loosely-coupled) and can employ workload stealing. We explore the performance and energy trends of six modern CNNs using different methods of load balancing for differently-coupled system configurations with variable AIMC tile resources. We show that, by properly distributing workloads, AIMC acceleration can be made highly effective even on under-provisioned systems. As an example, 5.9x speedup and 5.6x energy gains were measured on an 8-core system, for a 41% coverage of neural network parameters.","PeriodicalId":13257,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10622095/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Due to stringent energy and performance constraints, edge AI computing often employs heterogeneous systems that utilize both general-purpose CPUs and accelerators. Analog in-memory computing (AIMC) is a well-known AI inference solution that overcomes computational bottlenecks by performing matrix-vector multiplication operations (MVMs) in constant time. However, the tiles of AIMC-based accelerators are limited by the number of weights they can hold. State-of-the-art research often sizes neural networks to AIMC tiles (or vice-versa), but does not consider cases where AIMC tiles cannot cover the whole network due to lack of tile resources or the network size. In this work, we study the trade-offs of available AIMC tile resources, neural network coverage, AIMC tile proximity to compute resources, and multi-core load balancing techniques. We first perform a study of single-layer performance and energy scalability of AIMC tiles in the two most typical AIMC acceleration targets: dense/fully-connected layers and convolutional layers. This study guides the methodology with which we approach parameter allocation to AIMC tiles in the context of large edge neural networks, both where AIMC tiles are close to the CPU (tightly-coupled) and cannot share resources across the system, and where AIMC tiles are far from the CPU (loosely-coupled) and can employ workload stealing. We explore the performance and energy trends of six modern CNNs using different methods of load balancing for differently-coupled system configurations with variable AIMC tile resources. We show that, by properly distributing workloads, AIMC acceleration can be made highly effective even on under-provisioned systems. As an example, 5.9x speedup and 5.6x energy gains were measured on an 8-core system, for a 41% coverage of neural network parameters.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (TPDS) is published monthly. It publishes a range of papers, comments on previously published papers, and survey articles that deal with the parallel and distributed systems research areas of current importance to our readers. Particular areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
a) Parallel and distributed algorithms, focusing on topics such as: models of computation; numerical, combinatorial, and data-intensive parallel algorithms, scalability of algorithms and data structures for parallel and distributed systems, communication and synchronization protocols, network algorithms, scheduling, and load balancing.
b) Applications of parallel and distributed computing, including computational and data-enabled science and engineering, big data applications, parallel crowd sourcing, large-scale social network analysis, management of big data, cloud and grid computing, scientific and biomedical applications, mobile computing, and cyber-physical systems.
c) Parallel and distributed architectures, including architectures for instruction-level and thread-level parallelism; design, analysis, implementation, fault resilience and performance measurements of multiple-processor systems; multicore processors, heterogeneous many-core systems; petascale and exascale systems designs; novel big data architectures; special purpose architectures, including graphics processors, signal processors, network processors, media accelerators, and other special purpose processors and accelerators; impact of technology on architecture; network and interconnect architectures; parallel I/O and storage systems; architecture of the memory hierarchy; power-efficient and green computing architectures; dependable architectures; and performance modeling and evaluation.
d) Parallel and distributed software, including parallel and multicore programming languages and compilers, runtime systems, operating systems, Internet computing and web services, resource management including green computing, middleware for grids, clouds, and data centers, libraries, performance modeling and evaluation, parallel programming paradigms, and programming environments and tools.