Green mechanism: Opportunities for corporate investment in PV/battery/diesel hybrid systems with techno-economic and environmental analysis

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
Moien A Omar
{"title":"Green mechanism: Opportunities for corporate investment in PV/battery/diesel hybrid systems with techno-economic and environmental analysis","authors":"Moien A Omar","doi":"10.1177/01445987241269009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In rural areas, diesel generators are prevalent due to their lower initial cost, despite inefficiencies and carbon emissions. Transitioning to PV/Battery/Diesel systems offers a solution by reducing costs and emissions. However, the high upfront expenses present a significant barrier, particularly for rural communities, necessitating external financial support. This study evaluates the benefits of adopting a PV/Battery/Diesel hybrid system over traditional diesel generators in a rural community with 25 customers and a daily demand of 50 kWh. The proposed system includes a 12 kWp photovoltaic array and a 48 kWh battery bank, simulated using Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Energy Resources (HOMER) software. Results indicate a 91% renewable fraction and a cost of energy of 0.279 USD/kWh, substantially lower than the 1.05 USD/kWh of diesel-only systems, with CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> savings of 25 t per year. The paper advocates for a case study approach to green mechanism, urging energy and environmental companies to invest in these systems. By replacing diesel generators with hybrid PV/Diesel/Battery systems, companies can offer electricity at a reduced cost, driving adoption. Selling carbon credits from emission savings can generate additional income, leveraging CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> tax incentives. Under scenarios where investors cover 50% of diesel costs, selling electricity yields 9581 USD annually, and selling CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> credits generates 500 USD annually. This leads to a payback period of 9.83 years without CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> credits and 9.18 years with CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> credits, totaling 46,848 USD without CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> credits and 52,927 USD with CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> credits over the project's lifespan. Meanwhile, adjusting electricity pricing to 75% of diesel costs, this increases annual income from electricity sales to 14,372 USD. This reduces the payback period to 5.89 years without CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> credits and 5.66 years with CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> credits, totaling 105,094 USD without CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> credits and 111,174 USD with CO<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> credits at the end of the project.","PeriodicalId":11606,"journal":{"name":"Energy Exploration & Exploitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Exploration & Exploitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01445987241269009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In rural areas, diesel generators are prevalent due to their lower initial cost, despite inefficiencies and carbon emissions. Transitioning to PV/Battery/Diesel systems offers a solution by reducing costs and emissions. However, the high upfront expenses present a significant barrier, particularly for rural communities, necessitating external financial support. This study evaluates the benefits of adopting a PV/Battery/Diesel hybrid system over traditional diesel generators in a rural community with 25 customers and a daily demand of 50 kWh. The proposed system includes a 12 kWp photovoltaic array and a 48 kWh battery bank, simulated using Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Energy Resources (HOMER) software. Results indicate a 91% renewable fraction and a cost of energy of 0.279 USD/kWh, substantially lower than the 1.05 USD/kWh of diesel-only systems, with CO2 savings of 25 t per year. The paper advocates for a case study approach to green mechanism, urging energy and environmental companies to invest in these systems. By replacing diesel generators with hybrid PV/Diesel/Battery systems, companies can offer electricity at a reduced cost, driving adoption. Selling carbon credits from emission savings can generate additional income, leveraging CO2 tax incentives. Under scenarios where investors cover 50% of diesel costs, selling electricity yields 9581 USD annually, and selling CO2 credits generates 500 USD annually. This leads to a payback period of 9.83 years without CO2 credits and 9.18 years with CO2 credits, totaling 46,848 USD without CO2 credits and 52,927 USD with CO2 credits over the project's lifespan. Meanwhile, adjusting electricity pricing to 75% of diesel costs, this increases annual income from electricity sales to 14,372 USD. This reduces the payback period to 5.89 years without CO2 credits and 5.66 years with CO2 credits, totaling 105,094 USD without CO2 credits and 111,174 USD with CO2 credits at the end of the project.
绿色机制:光伏/电池/柴油混合动力系统的企业投资机会,包括技术经济和环境分析
在农村地区,柴油发电机虽然效率低、碳排放量大,但由于初始成本较低,因此非常普遍。过渡到光伏/电池/柴油系统可降低成本和排放,从而提供一种解决方案。然而,高昂的前期费用是一个重大障碍,特别是对于农村社区而言,需要外部资金支持。本研究评估了在一个拥有 25 个用户、日需求量为 50 千瓦时的农村社区采用光伏/电池/柴油混合系统而非传统柴油发电机的好处。拟议的系统包括一个 12 kWp 的光伏阵列和一个 48 kWh 的电池组,使用多能源资源混合优化(HOMER)软件进行模拟。结果表明,该系统的可再生能源比例为 91%,能源成本为 0.279 美元/千瓦时,大大低于纯柴油系统的 1.05 美元/千瓦时,每年可节约 25 吨二氧化碳。论文提倡采用案例研究的方法来研究绿色机制,敦促能源和环保公司投资这些系统。通过用光伏/柴油/电池混合系统取代柴油发电机,企业可以以更低的成本提供电力,从而推动系统的采用。通过出售减排产生的碳信用额度,可以利用二氧化碳税收优惠政策创造额外收入。在投资者承担 50% 柴油成本的情况下,出售电力每年可获得 9581 美元,出售二氧化碳信用额每年可获得 500 美元。因此,在不使用二氧化碳信用额度的情况下,投资回收期为 9.83 年;在使用二氧化碳信用额度的情况下,投资回收期为 9.18 年;在项目生命周期内,在不使用二氧化碳信用额度的情况下,投资回收期为 46848 美元;在使用二氧化碳信用额度的情况下,投资回收期为 52927 美元。同时,将电价调整为柴油成本的 75%,每年的售电收入将增加到 14 372 美元。这样,在不使用二氧化碳信用额度的情况下,投资回收期缩短为 5.89 年;在使用二氧化碳信用额度的情况下,投资回收期缩短为 5.66 年;在项目结束时,在不使用二氧化碳信用额度的情况下,投资回收期为 105,094 美元;在使用二氧化碳信用额度的情况下,投资回收期为 111,174 美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Exploration & Exploitation
Energy Exploration & Exploitation 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy Exploration & Exploitation is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that provides up-to-date, informative reviews and original articles on important issues in the exploration, exploitation, use and economics of the world’s energy resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信