Integrating Nano-Fertilizers with Mineral-Based Nutrients for Growth, Energy Efficiency, Economics, and Environmental Sustainability in Wheat crop

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Alok Singh Jayara, Rajeew Kumar, Anil Shukla, Ajeet Pratap Singh, Priyanka Pandey, Pavan Shukla, Ram Pravesh Rajbhar, Roshan Lal Meena, K Indudhar Reddy
{"title":"Integrating Nano-Fertilizers with Mineral-Based Nutrients for Growth, Energy Efficiency, Economics, and Environmental Sustainability in Wheat crop","authors":"Alok Singh Jayara, Rajeew Kumar, Anil Shukla, Ajeet Pratap Singh, Priyanka Pandey, Pavan Shukla, Ram Pravesh Rajbhar, Roshan Lal Meena, K Indudhar Reddy","doi":"10.1007/s42106-024-00304-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Higher energy inputs, greenhouse gases (GHG) emission, and higher costs are associated with fertilizer use which necessitates the exploration of alternative sources of plant nutrients. Keeping this in view, modified indigenous mineral product (MIMP) along with nanofertilizers were evaluated in wheat crop. Strip plot design was followed with sources of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) as horizontal factors viz<i>.</i> i) recommended phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) through fertilizers (P1) ii) MIMP with Nano DAP (P2), iii) MIMP with Nano K (P3); and Nitrogen (N) management options as vertical factors viz<i>.</i>, i) No nitrogen (N1), ii) Three sprays of Nano Urea (NU) (N2) iii) 50 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> at sowing with two spray of NU (N3), iv) 150 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>(N4). Growth and yield parameters were comparable for the horizontal factors; whereas, N3 and N4 recorded at par values among the vertical factors. N uptake in P2 was significantly more compared to rest. Sulfur (S) &amp; silicon (Si) uptake were significantly higher with MIMP application. Increasing the dose of N increased the nutrient uptake. The alternative sources of NPK led to significant increase in net returns under unsubsidized supplies. Reduced input energy and increased energy ratio (each by 32%) were observed with N3 compared to N4. Lower GHG emissions was reported with P2 and P3 (74–77%) compared to P1; and with N3 (67%) compared to N4. The study provides an insight for alternative nutrient management in place of existing practices for sustainable agriculture without reducing the crop productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant Production","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant Production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-024-00304-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Higher energy inputs, greenhouse gases (GHG) emission, and higher costs are associated with fertilizer use which necessitates the exploration of alternative sources of plant nutrients. Keeping this in view, modified indigenous mineral product (MIMP) along with nanofertilizers were evaluated in wheat crop. Strip plot design was followed with sources of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) as horizontal factors viz. i) recommended phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) through fertilizers (P1) ii) MIMP with Nano DAP (P2), iii) MIMP with Nano K (P3); and Nitrogen (N) management options as vertical factors viz., i) No nitrogen (N1), ii) Three sprays of Nano Urea (NU) (N2) iii) 50 kg N ha−1 at sowing with two spray of NU (N3), iv) 150 kg N ha−1(N4). Growth and yield parameters were comparable for the horizontal factors; whereas, N3 and N4 recorded at par values among the vertical factors. N uptake in P2 was significantly more compared to rest. Sulfur (S) & silicon (Si) uptake were significantly higher with MIMP application. Increasing the dose of N increased the nutrient uptake. The alternative sources of NPK led to significant increase in net returns under unsubsidized supplies. Reduced input energy and increased energy ratio (each by 32%) were observed with N3 compared to N4. Lower GHG emissions was reported with P2 and P3 (74–77%) compared to P1; and with N3 (67%) compared to N4. The study provides an insight for alternative nutrient management in place of existing practices for sustainable agriculture without reducing the crop productivity.

Abstract Image

将纳米肥料与矿物质营养元素相结合,促进小麦作物的生长、能源效率、经济性和环境可持续性
化肥的使用会带来更高的能源投入、温室气体(GHG)排放和更高的成本,因此有必要探索植物养分的替代来源。有鉴于此,我们对小麦作物中的改良本地矿物产品(MIMP)和纳米肥料进行了评估。采用条带小区设计,磷(P)和钾(K)来源为横向因素,即 i) 通过肥料推荐磷(P)和钾(K)(P1)ii) MIMP 与纳米磷酸二铵(P2),iii) MIMP 与纳米钾(P3);氮(N)管理选项为纵向因素,即 i) 无氮(N1),ii) MIMP 与纳米钾(P3)、i) 无氮(N1),ii) 喷洒三次纳米尿素(NU)(N2),iii) 播种时每公顷 50 千克氮,喷洒两次纳米尿素(N3),iv) 每公顷 150 千克氮(N4)。横向因子的生长和产量参数相当;而纵向因子中,N3 和 N4 的数值相当。与其他因素相比,P2 的氮吸收量明显增加。施用 MIMP 后,硫(S)和amp、硅(Si)的吸收量明显增加。增加氮的剂量增加了养分的吸收。在无补贴供应的情况下,氮磷钾替代来源导致净收益显著增加。与 N4 相比,N3 的投入能量减少,能量比率提高(各提高 32%)。与 P1 相比,P2 和 P3 的温室气体排放量较低(74-77%);与 N4 相比,N3 的温室气体排放量较低(67%)。这项研究为替代现有的养分管理方法以实现可持续农业提供了启示,同时不会降低作物产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IJPP publishes original research papers and review papers related to physiology, ecology and production of field crops and forages at field, farm and landscape level. Preferred topics are: (1) yield gap in cropping systems: estimation, causes and closing measures, (2) ecological intensification of plant production, (3) improvement of water and nutrients management in plant production systems, (4) environmental impact of plant production, (5) climate change and plant production, and (6) responses of plant communities to extreme weather conditions. Please note that IJPP does not publish papers with a background in genetics and plant breeding, plant molecular biology, plant biotechnology, as well as soil science, meteorology, product process and post-harvest management unless they are strongly related to plant production under field conditions. Papers based on limited data or of local importance, and results from routine experiments will not normally be considered for publication. Field experiments should include at least two years and/or two environments. Papers on plants other than field crops and forages, and papers based on controlled-environment experiments will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信